Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T01:43:05.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fleece characteristics and the wool follicle population of the Merilin, a Uruguayan sheep breed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

W. H. J. Clarke ,
J. B. Donnelly ,
A. Lombardini  and
R. González
W. H. J. Clarke
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Animal Production, PO Box 239, Blacktown, New South Wales 2148, Australia
J. B. Donnelly
Affiliation:
CSIRO, Division of Mathematics and Statistics, PO Box 239, Blacktown, New South Wales 2148, Australia
A. Lombardini
Affiliation:
Department of Sheep and Wool, Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, University of the Republic, Paysandu, Uruguay
R. González
Affiliation:
Department of Sheep and Wool, Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, University of the Republic, Paysandu, Uruguay
Get access

Abstract

Total follicle density, primary follicle density, secondary follicle density, secondary/primary ratio and incidence of medullated fibres were studied in skin specimens from 78 2-year-old Merilin rams representing nine parent studs in Uruguay. The limited data available suggest that the studs sampled may fall into various groups, although separation into distinct groups is not equally well defined for all variables measured. Consequently, a firm conclusion about the Merilin awaits further information on fleece weight, staple length and body weight.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , June 1981 , pp. 251 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arbiza, S., Abreu, M., Cardozo, O., and Sales, B. 1966. Estudio de la poblacion folicular en borregas Merino Australiano, Ideal, Corriedale y Romney Marsh. Boln. Estac. exp. Paysandu, Univ. Repiih., Drug. 3 (12): 1–19.Google Scholar
Azzarini, A. and Ponzoni, R. 1970. Aspectos Mvdernos de la Produccionovina. 1st ed. Universidad de la República, Uruguay.Google Scholar
Cardellino, R., González, G., Nicola, D., and O'brien, G. 1972. Relevamiento básico de la producción ovina en al Uruguay, 1970. Secretariado Uruguayo dc la Lara, Monetevideo.Google Scholar
Carter, H. B. and Clarke, W. H. 1957a. The hair follicle group and skin follicle population of Australian Merino sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res. 8: 91 108.Google Scholar
Carter, H. B. and Clarke, W. H. 1957b. The hair follicle group and skin follicle population of some non-Merino breeds of sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res. 8: 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, W. H. 1960. A histological technique for the study of the skin follicle population in sheep. Tech. Pap. Anim. Res. Labs. C.S.I.R.O. Aust., No. 3, pp. 92–97.Google Scholar
Clarke, W. H. and Smith, I. D. 1975. A preliminary evaluation of mohair production and the potential of Angora goats in three Eastern States. J. Aust. Inst. agric. Sci. 41:220–24.Google Scholar
Fraser, A. S. and Short, B. F. 1960. The biology of the fleece. Tech. Pap. Anim. Res. Labs C.S.I.R.O. Aust., No. 3, pp. 5–92.Google Scholar
Mason, I. L. 1969. A World Dictionary of Livestock Breeds, Types and Varieties. 2nd ed. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough, Buckinghamshire.Google Scholar
Miller, A. J. 1972. Letter to the editor. Technometrics. 14: 507.Google Scholar
Ryder, M. L. and Stephenson, S. K. 1968. Wool Growth. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Schinckel, P. G. 1957. The relationship between follicle number and wool production. Aust. J. agric. Res. 8: 512–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suarez, V. J. 1962. Vida y obra del Dr Jose Maria Elorza: escritos varios. Editorial Florensa y Lafón, Montevideo.Google Scholar
Turner, Helen N. 1956. Measurement as an aid to selection in breeding sheep for wool production. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 24: 87–118.Google Scholar
Turner, Helen N. 1958. Relationships among clean wool weight and its components. I. Changes in clean wool weight related to changes in the components. Aust. J. agric. Res. 9: 521–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Helen N. 1961. Relationships among clean wool weight and its components. II. The effect of maternal handicap and ifs influence on selection. Aust. J. agric. Res. 12:974–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Helen N., Dolling, C. H. S. and Kennedy, J. F. 1968. Response to selection in Australian Merino sheep. I. Selection for high clean wool weight, with a ceiling on fibre diameter and degree of skin wrinkle. Response in wool and body characteristics. Aust. J. agric. Res. 19: 79–112.Google Scholar
Young, S. S. Y. and Chapman, R. E. 1958. Fleece characters and their influence on wool production per unit area of skin in Merino sheep. Aust. J. agric. Res. 9: 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar