Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:35:08.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth of cattle twins on dairy farms with high and low yielding herds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1959

Gerald Wiener
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Organisation, Edinburgh, 9
Get access

Extract

Sixty-five pairs of two-egg cattle twins of three breeds, Ayrshire, Friesian, and Shorthorn, were split at random within a week of their birth between two groups of commercial dairy farms. One group was selected for a relatively high average milk yield of the adult dairy herd (group A) and the other for relatively low average yield (group B). The body growth of the twins up to nearly 4 years old is described in this paper. Very significant differences in growth developed in consequence of the split between the groups. Twins on the A farms became larger than their co-twins on the B farms. Average differences between the groups increased for the first year or 18 months and then began to fall away, but had not disappeared at the last age (198 weeks) studied. The various body parts behaved differently i n response to the treatments or environments associated with the two groups of farms. Thus, at the ages studied, the twins on the ‘high’ yield farms differed in conformation from their co-twins on the ‘low’ yield farms. In addition to the differences arising between the members of split twin pairs, there were also differences in body size between the pairs. Breed was not apparently important as a factor affecting the growth differences arising between the two treatments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blackmore, D., McGilliard, L., & Lush, J., 1958. Genetic relations between body measurements at three ages in Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci., 41: 1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnier, G., & Hansson, A., 1946. Studies on monozygous cattle twins. V. The effect of different plans of nutrition on growth and body development of dairy heifers. Acta Agric. suec., 1: 171.Google Scholar
Bonnier, G., Hansson, A., & Skjervold, H., 1948. Studies on monozygous cattle twins. IX. The interplay of heredity and environment on growth and yield. Acta Agric. suec., 3: 1.Google Scholar
Hammond, J., 1948. Farm Animals. Edward Arnold & Co., London.Google Scholar
Hammond, J., 1949. Requirements of and methods of obtaining an ideal dairy cow. Rapp. gén. (Gen. Rep.) V. Congr. int.Zootech. (Paris), 1949: 95.Google Scholar
Hansson, A., Brännäng, E., & Claesson, O., 1953. Studies on monozygous cattle twins. XIII. Body development in relation to heredity and intensity of rearing. Acta Agric. scand., 3: 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, A., 1956. Influence of rearing intensity on body development and milk production. Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod., 1956: 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, M., 1948. The Advanced Theory of Statistics. Charles Griffin & Co. Ltd., London. P. 410.Google Scholar
Taylor, St. C. S., 1958. A linear growth process in twin cattle. Proc. Xth int. Congr. Genet. (Montreal), 1958, Vol. II. (Abstr.): 291.Google Scholar
Touchberry, R. 1951. Genetic correlations between five body measurements, weight, type and production in the same individual among Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci., 34: 242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar