Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:32:07.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Milk production from grass silage diets: effects of the composition of supplementary concentrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

K. Aston ,
C. Thomas ,
S. R. Daley  and
J. D. Sutton
K. Aston
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
C. Thomas
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
S. R. Daley
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
J. D. Sutton
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
Get access

Abstract

Thirty-six British Holstein-Friesian cows were offered 9 kg dry matter (DM) daily of one of 12 concentrates together with grass silage ad libitum in a cyclical change-over design experiment during lactation weeks 8 to 22. The carbohydrate source in the concentrates was either mainly starch, mainly digestible fibre or a 1:1 mixture. Each concentrate type was formulated to provide 120, 160, 200 or 240 g crude protein (CP) per kg DM and similar metabolizable energy concentration. Silage contained 142 g CP per kg DM, in vivo digestible organic matter was 0·690 kg/kg DM, pH 4·4 and ammonia-N 172·2 g/kg total nitrogen.

Silage intake increased as fibre replaced starch in the concentrate. Apparent digestibility of organic matter and energy were highest for starch-based concentrates, but there was no effect of carbohydrate source on yields of milk and milk solids. Milk protein concentration was depressed by feeding mixed or fibrous carbohydrates.

Silage intake increased on average by 0·13 kg DM per additional 10 g/kg CP in the concentrate. The digestibility of the diet was not affected by increasing CP except for nitrogen. Milk yield increased by 0·028 kg per additional g/kg CP in the concentrate and there were linear effects ofCP on yields of milk solids.

As CP increased, milk fat concentration tended to rise with starch but was depressed both overall and by offering mixed or fibrous carbohydrates. In contrast milk protein concentration increased with mixed and fibrous carbohydrates but not with starch.

It is concluded that when silage is given ad libitum with 9 kg/day concentrates, CP level has more effect than source of carbohydrate on milk production.

Keywords

concentratesdairy cowsfood intakemilk production
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , December 1994 , pp. 335 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The nutrient requirements of farm livestock. No. 2. Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Aston, K., Thomas, C., Baker, R. D., Hughes, P. M. and Daley, S. R. 1992. The influence of carbohydrate source and concentration of crude protein in a concentrate given with grass silage ad libitum on the performance of autumn-calving Holstein-Friesian cows. Animal Production 54: 473 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Aston, K., Thomas, C., Daley, S. R., Sutton, J. D. and Dhanoa, M. S. 1994. Milk production from grass silage diets: effects of silage characteristics and the amount of supplementary concentrate. Animal Production 59: 31–41.Google Scholar
Burgess, P. L., Muller, L. D., Varga, G. A. and Griel, L. C. 1987. Addition of calcium salts of fatty acids to rations varying in neutral detergent fibre content for lactating dairy cows. journal of Dairy Science 70: suppl. 1, p. 220 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Cammell, S. B., Beever, D. E., Sutton, J. D., Spooner, M. C. and Haines, M. J. 1992. Body composition and performance of autumn-calving Holstein-Friesian dairy cows during lactation: energy partition. Animal Production 54: 475 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Castle, M. E. and Watson, J. N. 1976. Silage and milk production: a comparison between barley and groundnut cake as supplements to silage of high digestibility. journal of the British Grassland Society 31: 191–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G., Thomas, P. C., Wilson, W. D., Kassem, M. E. and Robertson, S. 1984. The influence of the type of carbohydrate in the supplementary concentrate on the utilisation of silage diets for milk production. Proceedings of the seventh silage conference, Queen's University, Belfast (ed. Gordon, F. J. and Unsworth, E. F.), pp. 37–38.Google Scholar
Davis, A. W. and Hall, W. B. 1969. Cyclical change-over designs. Biometrika 56: 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowman, M. G. and Collins, F. C. 1982. The use of enzymes to predict the digestibility of animal feeds. journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 33: 689–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genstat 5 Committee. 1987. Genstat 5 reference manual. Clarenden Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1979. The effect of protein content of the supplement for dairy cows with access ad libitum to high digestibility, wilted grass silage. Animal Production 28: 183–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKendrick, E. and Hyslop, J. J. 1992. A comparison of distillers' dark grains with proprietary concentrate for milk production. Animal Production 54: 464 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Mayne, C. S. and Gordon, F. J. 1984. The effect of type of concentrate and level of concentrate feeding on milk production. Animal Production 39: 65–76.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1986. The analysis of agricultural materials. Reference book 427. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland and Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Technical bulletin, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, no. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Newman, G. 1989. Supplementing silage in practice. In Silage for milk production (ed. Mayne, C. S.), British Grassland Society occasional symposium no. 23, pp. 61–66.Google Scholar
Oldham, J. D. and Smith, T. 1982. Protein-energy interrelationships for growing and for lactating cattle. In Protein contribution of feedstuffsfor ruminants (ed. Miller, E. L., Pike, I. H. and Es, A. J. H. van), pp. 103–130. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Reid, G. W. and McDonald, I. 1981. The effects of protein degradability and food intake on milk yield and composition in cows in early lactation. British journal of Nutrition 45: 547–555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phipps, R. H., Sutton, J. D., Weller, R. F. and Bines, J. A. 1987. The effect of concentrate composition and the method of silage feeding on intake and performance of lactating dairy cows. journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109: 337–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. 1976. Nutritional influences on milk quality. In Principles of cattle production (ed. Swan, H. and Broster, W. H.), pp. 221–236. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. and Line, C. 1961. The effect of the plane of energy nutrition of the cow on the secretion in milk of the constituents of the solids-not-fat fraction and on the concentrations of certain blood-plasma constituents. British journal of Nutrition 15: 109–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloan, B. K., Rowlinson, P. and Armstrong, D. G. 1988. Milk production in early lactation dairy cows given grass silage ad libitum: influence of concentrate energy source, crude protein content and level of concentrate allowance. Animal Production 46: 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, J. C. and Gordon, F. J. 1990. A comparison of the responses by lactating cows given grass silage to changes in the degradability or quantity of protein offered in the supplement. Animal Production 50: 391–398.Google Scholar
Spörndly, E. 1989. Effects of diet on milk composition and yield of dairy cows with special emphasis on milk protein content. Swedish journal of Agricultural Research 19: 99–106.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D. 1989. Altering milk composition by feeding. journal of Dairy Science 72: 2801–2814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Bines, J. A., Morant, S. V., Napper, D. J. and Givens, D. I. 1987. A comparison of starchy and fibrous concentrates for milk production, energy utilization and hay intake by Friesian cows. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109: 375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J. D., Morant, S. V., Bines, J. A., Napper, D. J. and Givens, D. I. 1993. Effect of altering the starch: fibre ratio in the concentrates on hay intake and milk production by Friesian cows. journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 120: 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayler, J. C. and Aston, K. 1976. Milk production from diets of silage and dried forage. 1. Effects of methods of processing dried grass and of including barley in the supplementation of grass silage given ad libitum. Animal Production 23: 197–220.Google Scholar
Terry, R. A., Tilley, J. M. A. and Outen, G. E. 1969. Effect of pH on cellulose digestion under in vitro conditions. journal of Hie Science of Food and Agriculture 20: 317–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, C. 1980. Conserved forages. In Feeding strategies for dairy cows (ed. Broster, W. H., Johnson, C. L. and Tayler, J. C.), pp. 8.1–8.14. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Aston, K., Daley, S. R. and Bass, J. 1986. Milk production from silage. 4. The effect of the composition of the supplement. Animal Production 42: 315–325.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Aston, K., Tayler, J. C., Daley, S. R. and Osbourn, D. F. 1981. Milk production from silage. 1. The influence of an additive containing formaldehyde and formic acid on the response of lactating heifers and cows to supplementary protein. Animal Production 32: 285–295.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Daley, S. R., Aston, K. and Hughes, P. M. 1981. Milk production from silage. 2. The influence of the digestibility of silage made from the primary growth of perennial ryegrass. Animal Production 33: 7–13.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C. 1984. Feeding and milk protein production. In Milk compositional quality and its importance in future markets (ed. Castle, M. E. and Gunn, R. G.), occasional publication, British Society of Animal Production, no. 9, pp. 53–67.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C. and Robertson, S. 1987. The effect of lipid and fibre source and content on silage intake, milk production and energy utilisation. Proceedings of the eighth silage conference, Hurley, pp. 173–174.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C., Robertson, S., Chamberlain, D. G., Livingstone, R. M., Garthwaite, P. H., Dewey, P. J. S. and Cole, D. J. A. 1988. Predicting the metabolisable energy of compounded feeds for ruminants. In Recent advances in animal nutrition — 1988 (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 127–146. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyrell, H. F. and Reid, J. T. 1965. Prediction of the energy value of cow's milk. Journal of Dairy Science 48: 1215–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. 1982. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant, p. 40. O and B Books Inc.Google Scholar
Visser, H. de and Groot, A. A. M. de. 1981. The influence of the starch and sugar content of concentrates on food intake, rumen fluid, production and composition of milk. In Metabolic disorders in farm animals (ed. Geisecke, D., Dirksen, G. and Stangassinger, M.), pp. 41–48. Veterinary Faculty of the University of Munich.Google Scholar
Waldo, D. R. 1978. The use of direct acidification in silage production. In Fermentation of silage — a review (ed. McCullough, M. E.), pp. 117–179. National Feed Ingredients Association, Iowa.Google Scholar