Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:17:50.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on forage evaluation for buffalo by various techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. Kishan  and
U. B. Singh
J. Kishan
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Nutrition, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, 243 122 UP India
U. B. Singh
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Nutrition, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, 243 122 UP India
Get access

Abstract

The relative efficiency of voluntary consumption, chemical composition, digestibility in vitro and in vivo, was tested for predicting the nutritive value of five forages: berseem (Trifolium alexandrinum); green oat (Avena sativa); oat hay; cow pea (Vigna spp.) and maize (Zea mays). The digestibility coefficients of dry matter (DM), crude protein, acid-detergent lignin and energy were significantly correlated with DM intake. Digestibilities in vitro of DM and cellulose after 12-h incubation were significantly related to digestibilities in vivo of DM and energy. The values for cellulose digestibility in vitro at 24 h were similar to those for digestibility of energy in vivo. Significant correlations were obtained between the crude protein content of forages and the voluntary DM intake and digestibility of nutrients. Increased cellulose and acid-detergent fibre contents were each related with decreased DM intake and digestibility of nutrients.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , June 1978 , pp. 343 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allinson, D. W. and Osbourn, D. F. 1970. The cellulose-lignin complex in forages and its relationship to forage nutritive value. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 74: 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists. 1960. Official Methods of Analysis. 9th ed.Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Chalupa, W. and Lee, D. D. 1966. Estimation of forage nutritive value from in vitro cellulose digestion. J. Dairy Sci. 49: 188–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danley, M. M. and Vetter, R. L. 1973. Changes in carbohydrate and nitrogen fractions and digestibility of forages: maturity and ensiling. J. Anim. Sci. 37: 994–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donefer, E., Crampton, E. W. and Lloyd, L. E. 1960. Prediction of the nutritive value index of a forage from in vitro rumen fermentation data. J. Anim. Sci. 19: 545–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Shazly, K., Dehority, B. A. and Johnson, R. R. 1960. A comparison of the all-grass, semipermeable membrane, and continuous flow types of apparatus for in vitro rumen fermentations. J. Dairy Sci. 43: 1445–1451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enqels, E. A. N., Schalkwyk, A., Van, Niemann, P. J. and Swart, J. A. 1970. In vitro digestibility of forages as an indication of nutritive value. Agroanimalia 2: 181–183.Google Scholar
Lefevre, C. F. and Kamstra, L. D. 1960. A comparison of cellulose digestion in vitro and in vivo. J. Anim. Sci. 19: 867–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, L. D., Lechtenberg, V. L., Bauman, L. F., Barnes, R. F. and Rhykerd, C. L. 1972. In vivo evaluation of a brown midrib mutant of Zea mays L. J. Anim. Sci. 35: 883–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, R. W., Salsbury, R. L., Hoefer, J. A. and Luecke, R. W. 1962. Relation of certain end products of rumen fermentation to forage feeding value. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 418–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, R. W., Bratzler, J. W., James, W. H., Tillman, A. D. and Meek, D. C. 1948. The effect of dietary fat on utilization of the energy and protein of rations by sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 7: 475–485.Google ScholarPubMed
Tilley, J. M. A., Deriaz, R. E. and Terry, R. A. 1960. The in vitro measurement of herbage digestibility and assessment of nutritive value. Proc. 8th int. Grassld Congr., Reading, pp. 533–537.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18: 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. 1963. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fiber and lignin. J. Ass. off. agric. Chem. 46: 829–835.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. 1967. Development of a comprehensive system of feed analyses and its application to forages. J. Anim. Sci. 26: 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar