Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T13:46:46.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rearing of dairy cattle. 4. Effect of concentrate supplementation on the live-weight gain and feed intake of calves offered roughages ad libitum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. D. Leaver
J. D. Leaver
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, Berkshire
Get access

Summary

The effects of three levels of concentrate supplementation on the live-weight gain and intake of roughages of 12-week-old British Friesian female calves were examined. Each supplement was offered for 12 weeks to two replicates of five calves which were group fed. The following six roughages were studied; high quality hay, dried grass wafers, grass silage, barley straw, poor quality hay and maize silage. The digestibility of the roughages was measured with sheep by total collection of faeces.

Increasing the level of concentrate supplementation gave linear increases in live-weight gains of calves with all roughages, the greatest response occurring with roughages of low digestibility. The intake of roughage was depressed by increasing the level of concentrate supplementation, the greatest depressions occurring with roughages of high digestibility. Live-weight gains and roughage intakes were higher with dried grass wafers and lower with maize silage than would be expected from their respective digestibility coefficients.

Multiple regression equations were calculated to relate live-weight gains or roughage intakes to concentrate intake and roughage digestibility. These equations predict from the digestibility of a roughage, the amount of concentrates required daily to produce a given live-weight gain, and the amount of roughage which is eaten under these circumstances.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , August 1973 , pp. 43 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blaxter, K. L. and Wilson, R. S. 1963. The assessment of a crop husbandry technique in terms of animal production. Anim. Prod. 5: 27–42.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C. 1966a. The effect of concentrates on the rate of disappearance of digesta from the alimentary tract of cows given hay. J. Dairy Res. 33: 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campling, R. C. 1966b. The intake of hay and silage by cows. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 21: 41–48.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C., Freer, M. and Balch, C. C. 1962. Factors affecting the voluntary intake of food by cows. 3. The effect of urea on the voluntary intake of oat straw. Br. J. Nutr. 16: 115–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campling, R. C. and Murdoch, J. C. 1966. The effect of concentrates on the voluntary intake of roughages by cows. J. Dairy Res. 33: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Shazly, K., Dehortty, B. A. and Johnson, R. R. 1961. Effect of starch on the digestion of cellulose in vitro and in vivo by rumen microorganisms. J. Anim. Sci. 20: 268–273.Google Scholar
Eng, K. S., Riewe, M. E., Craig, J. H. and Smith, J. C. 1964. Rate of passage of concentrate and roughage through the digestive tract of sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 23:1129–1132.Google Scholar
Griffiths, T. W. and Spillane, T. A. 1971. Protein and energy inter-relationships in silage-based diets for growing cattle. Anim. Prod. 13: 386 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Amilton, T. S. 1942. The effect of added glucose upon the digestibility of protein and of fibre in rations for sheep. J. Nutr. 23: 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, M. J. 1953. The effect of quality and quantity of carbohydrate and protein in the ration of the sheep on the digestibility of cellulose and other constituents of the ration. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 43: 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J. 1963. Effect of pelleting and wafering on feeding value of roughage. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18: 39–44.Google Scholar
Moore, L. A., Thomas, J. W. and Sykes, J. F. 1960. The acceptability of grass/legume silage by dairy cows. Proc. 8th int. Grassld Congr., Reading, pp. 701–704.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J. C. 1964. Some factors affecting the intake of roughage by sheep. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 19: 316–320.Google Scholar
Stone, J. B., Spalding, R. W., Merrill, W. G. and Reid, J. T. 1964. A dairy cattle feeding program for high production. Proc. Cornell Nutr. Conf. Feed Manufacturers, pp. 82–88.Google Scholar
Taylor, St C. S. and Young, G. B. 1966. Variation in growth and efficiency in twin cattle with liveweight and food intake controlled. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 66: 67–85.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J., Lonsdale, C. R., Tetlow, R. M. and Forrest, T. J. 1972. The voluntary intake and digestibility by cattle and sheep of dried grass wafers containing particles of different size. Anim. Prod. 14: 177–188.Google Scholar