Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T19:05:15.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reproduction in the gilt 7. Exposure of young gilts to the same mature boar and relocation: effects on the attainment of puberty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Philippa R. Eastham  and
D. J. A. Cole
Philippa R. Eastham
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, University of Nottingham, School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD
D. J. A. Cole
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, University of Nottingham, School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough LE12 5RD
Get access

Abstract

Twenty-four Landrace × (Landrace × Large White) gilts were randomly allocated at a mean age of 70 days to each of two rearing treatments which were: (1) housing gilts with other gilts but in complete isolation from other pigs; or (2) housing gilts with fence-line contact with a mature boar. At 160 days of age all gilts were relocated, treatment 1 gilts being adjacent to a mature boar for the first time while treatment 2 gilts were adjacent to the same mature boar with which they had had contact during rearing. In addition, the gilts on each treatment were exposed to full contact with this boar for 30 min/day. There were no significant differences between the treatments in age (176 and 185 days) or weight at puberty (81·9 and 82·6 kg), in the interval from relocation and full boar contact to puberty (11 and 16 days) and in ovulation rate at the pubertal oestrus (11·6 and 11·5).

In a second experiment, 72 gilts were reared with fence-line contact with a mature boar and at 160 days of age, half were relocated adjacent to a novel mature boar and the other half remained in the rearing house next to a novel boar with all gilts receiving full boar contact for 30 min/day. Significantly more relocated gilts reached puberty during the experimental period (25/32) than gilts which were only exposed to contact with a novel boar and not relocated (12/31) (P < 0·001) and those relocated gilts were significantly younger (187 v. 225 days; P < 0·001) and lighter (75·4 v. 93·9 kg; P < 0·001) at puberty and the induction interval was significantly shorter (20 v. 89 days; P < 0·001) compared with gilts on the second treatment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , June 1987 , pp. 435 - 441
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1967. Summary of requirements for energy. In The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock No. 3, Pigs, p. 82. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H. and Cole, D. J. A. 1969. The effect of boar presence on the age of puberty of gilts. Report of the School of Agriculture, University of Nottingham, pp. 74–77.Google Scholar
Bruce, H. M. 1959. An exteroceptive block to pregnancy in the mouse. Nature, London 184: 105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, D. J. A., Dyck, G. W. and Nathan, S. 1982. Reproduction in the gilt. 4. The effect of rearing gilts with contemporary castrated males or intact males on the attainment of puberty. Animal Production 35: 171–175.Google Scholar
DU Mesnil Du Buisson, F. and Signoret, J. P. 1962. Influences de facteurs externes sur le declenchement de a l puberté chez la truie. Annales de Zootechnie 11: 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastham, P. R., Dyck, G. W. and Cole, D. J. A. 1984. Reproduction in the gilt. 5. The effect of the presence of the mature male during rearing on puberty attainment. Animal Production 39: 277–282.Google Scholar
Eastham, P. R., Dyck, G. W. and Cole, D. J. A. 1986. Reproduction in the gilt. 6. The effect of various degrees of mature boar contact during rearing on puberty attainment. Animal Production 43: 341–349.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, J. F. and Isaac, D. E. 1963. The reproduction of heteromyid rodents in captivity. Journal of Mammalogy 44: 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, P. E. 1982. Factors affecting the natural attainment of puberty in the gilt. In Control of Pig Reproduction (ed. Cole, D. J. A. and Foxcroft, G. R.), pp. 117–138. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkwood, R. N. 1980. Puberty in the gilt. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, R. N., Forbes, J. M. and Hughes, P. E. 1981. Influence of boar contact on the attainment of puberty in gilts after removal of the olfactory bulbs. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 61: 193–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkwood, R. N. and Hughes, P. E. 1980. A note on the influence of ‘boar effect’ component stimuli on puberty attainment in the gilt. Animal Production 31: 209–211.Google Scholar
Lindsley, D. B. 1960. Attention, consciousness, sleep and wakefulness. In Handbook of Physiology, Section 1, Neurophysiology, Vol. III (ed. Field, J., Magoun, H. W. and Hall, V. E.), pp. 1553–1593. American Physiological Society, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Martinat, F., Legault, C., Du Mensil Du Buisson, F., Ollivier, L. and Signoret, J. P. 1970. Etudes des retards de puberte chez la truie. Journées de la Recherche Porcine en France, pp. 47–54. L'Institut Technique du Pore, Paris.Google Scholar
Paredis, F. 1961. [Investigations on fertility and artificial insemination in the pig.] Mededdingen van de Vecartsenijschool Rijksuniversitet te Gent 5: (1), 1–136.Google Scholar
Pearce, G. P. and Hughes, P. E. 1985. The influence of daily movement of gilts and the environment in which boar exposure occurs on the efficacy of boar-induced precocious puberty in the gilt. Animal Production 40: 161–167.Google Scholar
Purvis, K., Cooper, K. J. and Haynes, N. B. 1971. The influence of male proximity and dietary restriction on the oestrous cycle of the rat. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 27: 167–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riches, J. H. and Watson, R. H. 1954. The influence of the introduction of rams on the incidence of oestrus in Merino ewes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 5: 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon-Legagneur, E. 1970. [A study of some of the factors in the variation of age and weight of Large White sows at first oestrus.] Journees de la Recherche Porcine en France, pp. 41–46. L'Institut Technique du Pore, Paris.Google Scholar
Schmidt, K. and Bretschneider, W. 1954. [The outward course of the sexual cycle in the sow.] Tierzucht 8: 119–125.Google Scholar
Stickney, K. 1981. The physiology of oestrogen-induced puberty in the gilt. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. 1973. The analysis of designed experiments with censored observations.Biometrics 29: 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrathall, A. E. 1975. Reproductive disorders in pigs. Review Series, Commonwealth Bureau of Animal Health, No. 11. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. R., Bourn, P. and Donovan, D. 1976. Effect of ‘transport phenomenon’ stimuli and boar exposure on puberty in gilts. Journal of Animal Science 42: 1362 (Abstr.).Google Scholar