Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T23:11:54.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the effect of social environment on the behaviour and growth rates of artificially-reared British Friesian male calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. B. Stephens
D. B. Stephens
Affiliation:
ARC Institute of Animal Physiology, Babraham, Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Observations have been carried out on the effect of social environment on the behaviour and growth rates of British Friesian male calves artificially reared on an automatic Nursette milk dispenser. The observations were made during two watches of 3 hr duration per week for the first 9 weeks of the calves' stay in the rearing unit. The calves appeared to be in a high state of anxiety on arrival and showed a vigorous following response to each other and the stockman. Although the lighter subordinate calves spent less time in sucking the Nursette than the heavier dominant calves, and had a lower pre-weaning growth rate, they spent more time ingesting dry feed. Consequently they suffered a less severe check in growth rate at abrupt weaning after 6 weeks than the dominant calves. Non-nutritive cross-sucking of the ear, scrotum or prepuce of others in the group occurred in some calves. The aetiology of cross-sucking is discussed and interpreted in terms of an oral deprivation hypothesis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , February 1974 , pp. 23 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agnes, F. and Genchi, C. 1972. [Physiological disorders of cattle after transportation. II. Serum proteins, glycaemia, azotaemia, uricaemia.] Clinica Veterinaria 95: (3), 65–70.Google Scholar
Alder, F. E. and Chambers, D. T. 1962. Outdoor rearing of calves for beef. Worcs. Agr. Chron. 28: 1–6.Google Scholar
Alexander, G. and Williams, D. 1966. Teat-seeking activity in lambs during the first hours of life. Anim. Behav. 14: 166–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altman, E. H. 1958. Social interpretation in the moose calf. Anim. Behav. 6: 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arsavskij, I. A. and Enikeeva, S. I. 1962. Characteristics of excitability of the feeding centre in the physiologically mature new-born infant. Bull, expl Biol. Med. U.S.S.R. 54: 7–12.Google Scholar
Brownlee, A. 1950. Studies in the behaviour of domestic cattle in Britain. Bull. Anim. Behav. 8: 11–20.Google Scholar
Brownlee, A. 1954. Play in domestic cattle in Britain: an analysis of its nature. Br. vet. J. 110: 48–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, J. B. 1950. The study of wild animals under controlled conditions. Ann. N. Y. Acad.Sci. 51: 1113–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, D. P., Barr, G. R. and Wieckert, D. A. 1967. Social relationship of dairy cows in a feed hut. Behaviour 29: 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Susan L., Black, W. C. and Albright, J. L. 1966. The effects of early feeding and rearing experiences on dominance, aggressive and submissive behaviour in young heifer calves. Am. Zool. 6: 559–560.Google Scholar
Finger, Von K. H. and Brummer, H. 1969. Observations on the sucking habits of calves reared in the absence of their dam. Dt. tierdrztl. Wschr. 76: 665–667.Google Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E. and Ljneweaver, J. A. 1968. Suckling behaviour in natural and artificially fed neonate calves. Z. Tierpsychol. 25: 187–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hess, E. H. 1959. Imprinting. Science, N.Y. 130: 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. 1971. The development of solid food intake in calves. 5. The relationship between liquid and solid food intake. Anim. Prod. 13: 593–597.Google Scholar
Koepke, J. and Pribram, K. H. 1971. Effect of milk on the maintenance of suckling behaviour of kittens from birth to six months. J. comp. Physiol. Psychol. 75: (3), 363–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leaver, J. D. and Yarrow, N. H. 1972. Rearing of dairy cattle. 1. Type and level of milk substitute offered once daily to calves. Anim. Prod. 14: 155–159.Google Scholar
Levy, D. M. 1934. Experiments on the sucking reflex and social behaviour of dogs. Am. J. Orthopsychiat. 4: 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, C. M. and Wegat-litre, E. 1962. Mise au point d'une methode d'alimentation des veaux d'elevage. II. Modalite de la repartition du lait. Annls Zootech. 11: 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPhee, C. P., McBride, G. and James, J. W. 1964. Social behaviour of domestic steers. Anim. Prod. 6: 9–15.Google Scholar
Moltz, H. 1960. Imprinting: empirical basis and theoretical significance. Psychol. Bull. 57: 291–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preston, T. R. 1957. Early weaning of calves. N.A.A.S.q. Rev. 35: 18–27.Google Scholar
Ross, S. 1951. Sucking behaviour in neonate dogs. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 46: 142–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schein, M. W. and Forman, M. N. 1955. Social dominance relationship in a herd of dairy cattle. Anim. Behav. 3: 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, D. B. 1972. Social behaviour in groups of artificially reared bull calves. Proc. World Assoc. for Buiatrics Congress, London, pp. 476–480.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. 1966. The appetite and live-weight gain of calves fed ad libitum on both grass and cold or warm milk. Tech. Rep. No. 3, Grassland Research Institute, Hurley.Google Scholar
Wiltbank, J. M., Bond, J., Warwick, E. J. and Reynolds, W. L. 1965. Influence of total feed and protein intake on reproducing performance in the beef cattle through second calving. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric, No. 1314.Google Scholar
Wood, P. D. P., Smith, G. F. and Lisle, M. F. 1967. A survey of inter-sucking in dairy herds in England and Wales. Vet. Rec. 81: 396–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar