The evaluation of a device for feeding group-housed animals individually†

P. J. Broadbent; J. A. R. McIntosh; A. Spence

doi:10.1017/S0003356100038812

Summary

A system which allows group-housed animals to feed individually is described. In this systm animals have sole access to their individual feeding point and this access is unlimited in duration and frequency. The food intake and performance of growing Friesian castrated male calves housed and fed by two arrangemente of this feeding device have been compared with cattle that were group-housed and group-fed, and cattle individually penned. A4 × 4 latin square design was used.

No significant treatment differences were detected and the feeding device did not appear to affect the food intake, performance or behaviour of the cattle.

References

REFERENCES

Broadbent, P. J. 1967. Individual feeding device for livestock. Anim. Prod. 9: 269–270 (Abstr.).Google Scholar

Liscombe Experimental Husbandry Farm. 1966. Results of experiments at Experimental Husbandry Farms, 1966, No. 14, pp. 58–60.Google Scholar

Mitchell, K. G. 1965. Preliminary observations of food consumption variations in group-fed pigs. Anim. Prod. 7: 285 (Abstr.).Google Scholar

Simpson, D. J. 1968. An automatic gate selector device for cattle feeding. Phys. Med. Biol. 13: 459–60.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Crossref Citations

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Broadbent, P. J. 1976. The utilization of whole or bruised barley grain of different moisture contents given to beef cattle as a supplement to a forage-based diet. Animal Science, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 165.

Bakker, IJ. Tj. and Veen, W. A. G. 1977. The protein‐saving effect of urea, starea and 1.1.‐diureido isobutane when used in concentrates for high‐productive dairy cows. Zeitschrift für Tierphysiologie Tierernährung und Futtermittelkunde, Vol. 38, Issue. 1-6, p. 261.

Petchey, A.M. and Mbatya, Paul B.A. 1977. The intake of steers and heifers fed on mixtures of alkali-treated or untreated straw with grass silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology, Vol. 2, Issue. 4, p. 315.

Shaw, R. A. 1978. A time-controlled feeding system for cattle. Animal Science, Vol. 27, Issue. 3, p. 277.

Cammell, S. B. Spooner, M. C. and Thomson, D. J. 1979. A note on the use of electronic doors for individual feeding of group-housed lambs. Animal Science, Vol. 28, Issue. 3, p. 407.

Arave, C.W. and Anderson, M.J. 1979. Feed Intake, Weight Gain, and Behavioral Activity of Heifers on an Electronic or a Tie-Up Feeding System. Journal of Dairy Science, Vol. 62, Issue. 7, p. 1104.

Broadbent, P.J. 1980. Mechanization of Feeding in Relation to Feeding Systems. BSAP Occasional Publication, Vol. 2, Issue. , p. 103.

Petchey, A. M. and Broadbent, P. J. 1980. The performance of fattening cattle offered barley and grass silage in various proportions either as discrete feeds or as a complete diet. Animal Science, Vol. 31, Issue. 3, p. 251.

Kaiser, A. G. Tayler, J. C. Gibbs, B. G. and England, P. 1981. The effects of the quantity of formaldehyde applied at ensiling and of urea supplementation at feeding on the utilization of red clover silages by young growing cattle. The Journal of Agricultural Science, Vol. 97, Issue. 1, p. 1.

Kaiser, A. G. Osbourn, D. F. England, P. and Dhanoa, M. S. 1982. The utilization by calves of formaldehyde-treated maize silages and the response to supplementary protein. Animal Science, Vol. 34, Issue. 2, p. 179.

HARB, M. Y. and CAMPLING, R. C. 1983. Effects of the amount of barley and time of access to grass silage on the voluntary intake, eating behaviour and production of dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science, Vol. 38, Issue. 2, p. 115.

Neilson, D. R. Whittemore, C. T. Lewis, M. Alliston, J. C. Roberts, D. J. Hodgson-Jones, L. S. Mills, J. Parkinson, H. and Prescott, J. H. D. 1983. Production characteristics of high-yielding dairy cows. Animal Science, Vol. 36, Issue. 3, p. 321.

Truscott, T. G. Wood, J. D. and MacFie, H. J. H. 1983. Fat deposition in Hereford and Friesian steers: 1. Body composition and partitioning of fat between depots. The Journal of Agricultural Science, Vol. 100, Issue. 2, p. 257.

Kaiser, A. G. Osbourn, D. F. and England, P. 1983. The influence of formaldehyde application at ensiling and of supplementation with urea or maize starch on the utilization by calves of ryegrass and red clover silages. Animal Science, Vol. 36, Issue. 3, p. 371.

Thiessen, R. B. Hnizdo, Eva Maxwell, D. A. G. Gibson, D. and Taylor, C. S. 1984. Multibreed comparisons of British cattle. Variation in body weight, growth rate and food intake. Animal Science, Vol. 38, Issue. 3, p. 323.

PHILLIPS, C. J. C. and LEAVER, J. D. 1985. Effect of restriction of silage intake and the provision of an alternative forage on the performance of dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science, Vol. 40, Issue. 4, p. 419.

Gibson, J. P. 1986. Efficiency and performance of genetically high and low milk-producing British Friesian and Jersey cattle. Animal Science, Vol. 42, Issue. 2, p. 161.

Newbold, J. R. Garnsworthy, P. C. Buttery, P. J. Cole, D. J. A. and Haresign, W. 1987. Protein nutrition of growing cattle: food intake and growth responses to rumen degradable protein and undegradable protein. Animal Science, Vol. 45, Issue. 3, p. 383.

SABRI, M. S. and ROBERTS, D. J. 1988. The effects of feeding fodder beet with two levels of concentrate allocation to dairy cattle. Grass and Forage Science, Vol. 43, Issue. 4, p. 427.

Slader, R.W. and Gregory, A.M.S. 1988. An automatic feeding and weighing system for ad libitum fed pigs. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Vol. 3, Issue. 2, p. 157.

Download full list

Article contents

The evaluation of a device for feeding group-housed animals individually†

Summary

Access options

References

REFERENCES

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Article contents

The evaluation of a device for feeding group-housed animals individually†

Summary

Access options

References

REFERENCES

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests