Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T19:11:55.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on the density of bovine limb bones

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. A. J. Fursey
Affiliation:
ARC Meat Research Institute, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DY
Get access

Summary

The densities of about 1000 limb bones, excised from 110 carcasses of four breeds of cattle ranging in age from 6 to 36 months, were measured by the method of weighing in water. The density of individual bones varied considerably ranging from 1·24 to 1·71 gcm-3 Some of this variation was due to differences between the various bone types within a limb, the cannon bones being more dense than the tibia and radius/ulna which in turn were more dense than either the humerus or femur. Age and breed also influenced density; the older the animal the more dense were its bones and the bones of Jersey cattle were more dense than those of Herefords of the same age. These findings conflict with an assumption that has been made hither to in theoretical analyses of the densitometric method of estimating the composition of carcasses, where skeletal density has been generally taken as constant.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Jar Vis, H. F. T. 1971. The thermal variation of the density of beef and the determination of its coefficient of cubical expansion. J. Fd Technol. 6: 383391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, T. M. and Akers, J. M. 1972. A note on the determination of the age of cattle at slaughter by visual assessment of the stage of ossification of bones. Anim. Prod. 14: 371373.Google Scholar
Morales, M. F., Rathbun, E. N., Smith, R. E. and Pace, N. 1945. Theoretical considerations regarding the major body tissue components, with suggestions for application to man. J. biol. Chem. 158: 677684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. R. 1972. Visual assessment of beef and lamb. WdRev. Anim.Prod. 8: 8795.Google Scholar