Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:47:18.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Complex housing environment for farmed blue foxes (Vulpes lagopus): use of various resources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2013

T. Koistinen  and
H. T. Korhonen
T. Koistinen*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Eastern Finland, PO Box 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
H. T. Korhonen
Affiliation:
Animal Production Research, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Silmäjärventie 2, 69100 Kannus, Finland
*
†E-mail: Tarja.Koistinen@uef.fi
Get access

Abstract

The present study was designed to measure the use of various, simultaneously available resources in a complex housing environment in juvenile blue foxes. Twelve blue fox sibling (male–female) pairs were housed in two-section experimental cages from the age of 8 weeks until the age of 7 months (from June to December). Each experimental cage was furnished with two platforms, a nest box, a sand box and a wooden block. This housing set-up provided the foxes with social contact, and an opportunity for oral manipulation, scratching and nesting, as well as the choice of staying on a solid floor material or on an elevated location. The foxes’ behaviour was recorded at three time points during autumn (September, November and December). The foxes used all available resources. The most utilised resource was the nest box, possibly because it could be utilised in several ways (as a shelter, an elevated location, an object for scratching and for oral manipulation). The foxes also stayed more in the cage section containing the nest box than in the cage section containing a sand box. The foxes rested much on the cage floor, but they also used the interior of the nest box and elevated locations for resting. Social contact often occurred during resting. Thus, the nest box and elevated location, in conjunction with social contact seem to be valuable while resting. While active, the foxes utilised the cage floor and roof of the nest box instead of the platforms. Scratching, digging and an interaction with the wooden block were seldom observed. Activity occurred mainly on the ‘empty’ cage area. In conclusion, all studied resources provided blue foxes with a distinct value, as they all were used in the complex housing environment. The nest box is used most and for most variable behaviours.

Keywords

fur farmingbehaviournest boxcage
Type
Behaviour, welfare and health
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 8 , August 2013 , pp. 1354 - 1361
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahola, L 2002. Effects of social and physical housing environment on the welfare in silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes). PhD thesis, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland.Google Scholar
Ahola, L, Turunen, A, Mononen, J, Koistinen, T 2010. Gnawing bones as enrichment for farmed blue foxes (Vulpes lagopus). Animal 4, 951–957.Google Scholar
Ahola, L, Mononen, J, Pyykönen, T, Mohaibes, M, Hänninen, S 2005. Group size and space allocation in farmed juvenile blue foxes (Alopex lagopus). Animal Welfare 14, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akre, AK, Hovland, AL, Bakken, M, Braastad, BO 2008. Risk assessment concerning the welfare of animals kept for fur production. A report to the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety 9th May 2008. Norwegian University of Life Science, Ås, Norway.Google Scholar
Alakylmänen, A, Mononen, J, Kasanen, S, Harri, M 2001. Demand for unobstructed view in blue foxes. In Proceedings of the 13th Nordic Symposium of the International Society for Applied Ethology, 25–27 January 2001, Lammi, Finland, p. 12.Google Scholar
Audet, AM, Robbins, CB, Lariviére, S 2002. Alopex lagopus. Mammalian Species 713, 1–10.Google Scholar
Elmore, MRP, Garner, JP, Johnson, AK, Kirkden, RD, Patterson-Kane, EG, Richert, BT, Pajor, EA 2012. Differing results for motivation tests and measures of resource use: the value of environmental enrichment to gestating sows housed in stalls. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 141, 9–19.Google Scholar
European Convention 1999. Standing committee of the European convention for the protection of animals kept for farming purposes (T-AP). Recommendations concerning fur animals. The standing committee. 37th Meeting, Strasbourg, 22–25 June 1999, 23 pp.Google Scholar
Hansen, SW, Malmkvist, J, Palme, R, Damgaard, BM 2007. Do double cages and access to occupational materials improve the welfare of farmed mink? Animal Welfare 16, 63–76.Google Scholar
Harri, M, Mononen, J, Rekilä, T, Korhonen, H, Niemelä, P 1998. Effects of top nest box on growth, fur quality and behaviour of blue foxes (Alopex lagopus) during their growing season. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A Animal Science 48, 184–191.Google Scholar
Hovland, AL, Akre, AK, Bakken, M 2010a. Group housing of adult silver fox (Vulpes vulpes) vixens in autumn: agonistic behavior during the first days subsequent to mixing. Applied Animal Behavior Science 126, 154–162.Google Scholar
Hovland, AL, Akre, AK, Bakken, M 2010b. Group housing of adult silver fox (Vulpes vulpes) vixens during autumn and its consequences for body weight, injuries and later reproduction: a field study. Applied Animal Behavior Science 127, 130–138.Google Scholar
Hovland, AL, Mason, GJ, Kirkden, RD, Bakken, M 2008. The nature and strength of social motivations in young farmed silver fox vixens (Vulpes vulpes). Applied Animal Behavior Science 111, 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauhiainen, L, Korhonen, HT 2005. Optimal behaviour sampling and autocorrelation curve: modelling data of farmed foxes. Acta Ethologica 15, 13–21.Google Scholar
Koistinen, T 2009. Farmed blue foxes’ (Vulpes lagopus) need for a sand floor. PhD thesis, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland.Google Scholar
Koistinen, T, Ahola, L, Mononen, J 2008. Blue foxes’ (Alopex lagopus) preferences between earth floor and wire mesh floor. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 111, 38–53.Google Scholar
Koistinen, T, Jauhiainen, L, Korhonen, HT 2009a. Relative value of a nest box, sand floor and extra space during the breeding season in adult blue fox males. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 120, 192–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koistinen, T, Turunen, A, Kiviniemi, V, Ahola, L, Mononen, J 2009b. Bones as enrichment for farmed blue foxes (Vulpes lagopus): interaction with the bones and preference for a cage with the bones. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 120, 108–116.Google Scholar
Korhonen, HT, Niemelä, P 2000. Enrichment value of wooden blocks for farmed blue foxes (Alopex lagopus). Animal Welfare 9, 177–191.Google Scholar
Korhonen, HT, Niemelä, P, Tuuri, H 1996. Seasonal changes in platform use by farmed blue foxes (Alopex lagopus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 48, 99–114.Google Scholar
Korhonen, HT, Jauhiainen, T, Rekilä, T 2003. In-cage sandbox as a ground substitute for farmed blue foxes (Alopex lagopus): effects on digging activity and welfare. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 83, 703–712.Google Scholar
Korhonen, HT, Jauhiainen, L, Rekilä, T 2006. Effects of year-round nestbox availability and temperament on welfare and production performance in blue foxes (Alopex lagopus). Annals of Animal Science 6, 149–167.Google Scholar
Korhonen, HT, Eskeli, P, Huuki, H 2012. Welfare consequences of digging substrates in blue foxes. Scientifur 36, 376–380.Google Scholar
Korhonen, HT, Jauhiainen, L, Niemelä, P, Sauna-aho, R 2002. Wooden blocks and straw as environmental enrichments for juvenile blue foxes (Alopex lagopus). Acta Ethologica 5, 29–37.Google Scholar
Martin, P, Bateson, P 1993. Measuring behaviour, an introductory guide, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Mononen, J, Harri, M, Rekilä, T 1996a. Comparison of preferences of farmed silver and blue foxes for cages with and without a nest box. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A, Animal Science 46, 117–124.Google Scholar
Mononen, J, Harri, M, Rekilä, T 1996b. Farmed foxes prefer a cage with an unobstructed view. Scandinavian Journal of Laboratory Animal Science 23, 43–48.Google Scholar
Mononen, J, Møller, SH, Hansen, SW, Hovland, AL, Kostinen, T, Lidfors, L, Malmkvist, J, Vinke, CM, Ahola, L 2012. The development of on-farm welfare assessment protocols for foxes and mink: the WelFur project. Animal Welfare 21, 363–371.Google Scholar
Nimon, AJ, Broom, DM 2001. The welfare of farmed foxes Vulpes vulpes and Alopex lagopus in relation to housing and management: a review. Animal Welfare 10, 223–248.Google Scholar
Pyykönen, T, Mononen, J, Ahola, L, Rekilä, T 2005. Periparturient behaviour in farmed blue foxes (Alopex lagopus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 94, 133–147.Google Scholar
Williams, CM, Riddell, PM, Scott, LA 2008. Comparison of preference for object properties in the rat using paired- and free-choice paradigm. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 112, 146–157.Google Scholar