Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T07:38:26.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determining optimum age of Holstein dairy calves when adding chopped alfalfa hay to meal starter diets based on measures of growth and performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2015

S. M. Hosseini ,
G. R. Ghorbani ,
P. Rezamand  and
M. Khorvash
S. M. Hosseini
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156, Iran
G. R. Ghorbani
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156, Iran
P. Rezamand*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Veterinary Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA
M. Khorvash
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156, Iran
*
†E-mail: rezamand@uidaho.edu
Get access

Abstract

The present study was conducted to determine the optimum age of Holstein dairy calves for an effective inclusion of alfalfa hay (AH) in starter feed on performance, apparent digestibility and feeding behavior. A total of 40 Holstein dairy calves (20 female and 20 male) were used in a completely randomized design in which calves were randomly assigned to one of four different dietary treatments including control (CON) calves fed starter feed without any forage and three treatments consisting of the same starter feed plus 15% chopped AH fed when calves were at the 2nd (AH2), 4th (AH4) or 6th (AH6) week of age. Calves were individually housed and bedded with sand that was replaced every other day. Feed and water were available ad libitum throughout the experiment. Calves were fed milk at 10% of birth BW twice daily until d 57. The study concluded when calves were 73 days old. Starter intake was recorded daily and BW was measured weekly. Data were analyzed as a complete randomized design by MIXED procedures of SAS. Results demonstrate that calves receiving AH treatments numerically consumed more starter feed (0.62 v. 0.78, 0.71 and 0.65 kg/day for CON, AH2, AH4 and AH6, respectively) and had greater average daily gain (ADG) compared with CON (0.48 v. 0.57, 0.49 and 0.49 kg/day for CON, AH2, AH4 and AH6), although the significant difference was observed only between AH2 and CON. Among AH treatments, calves in AH2 had better performance than AH6 in several cases including starter intake, ADG. No detectable differences were observed, however, in apparent dry matter, organic matter or CP digestibility among treatments. Ruminal pH and NH3 concentrations, measured on weeks 4, 6, 8 and 10, were lower for calves fed CON compared with other treatments, with ammonia concentrations decreasing over time. Calves in the AH treatments spent more time eating and ruminating compared with CON. Calves fed CON, however, spent more time on laying down compared with other treatments. Overall, results from the present study illustrated that inclusion of alfalfa in starter feed for calves at 2 weeks of age may improve feed intake, ADG and stimulate rumination in young Holstein dairy calves. Results, however, should be viewed with caution as the number of calves per treatment was small and large calf-to-calf variation may have affected the results reported.

Keywords

alfalfabehaviordairy calfgrowth
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , April 2016 , pp. 607 - 615
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, KL, Nagaraj, TG and Morrill, JL 1987. Rumen metabolic development in calves weaned conventionally or early. Journal of Dairy Science 70, 1000–1005.Google Scholar
Anderson, MJ, Khoyloo, M and Walters, JL 1982. Effect of feeding whole cottonseed on intake, body weight, and reticulorumen development of young Holstein calves. Journal of Dairy Science 65, 764–772.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th edition AOAC, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
Bartley, EE, Davidovich, AD, Barr, GW, Griffel, GW, Dayton, AD, Deyoe, CW and Bechtle, RM 1976. Ammonia toxicity in cattle. I. Rumen and blood changes associated with toxicity and treatment methods. Journal of Animal Science. 53, 835–841.Google Scholar
Beharka, AA, Nagaraja, TG, Morrill, JL, Kennedy, GA and Klemm, RD 1998. Effects of form of the diet on anatomical, microbial and fermentative development of the rumen of neonatal calves. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 1946–1955.Google Scholar
Broderick, GA and Kang, JH 1980. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in rumen fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Science 63, 64–75.Google Scholar
Castells, LI, Bach, A, Araujo, G, Montoro, C and Terre, M 2012. Effect of different forage sources on performance and feeding behavior of Holstein calves. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 286–293.Google Scholar
Coverdale, JA, Tyler, HD, Quigley, JD III and Brumm, JA 2004. Effect of various levels of forage and form of diet on rumen development and growth in calves. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 2554–2562.Google Scholar
Franklin, ST, Amaral-Phillips, DM, Jackson, JA and Campbell, AA 2003. Health and performance of Holstein calves that suckled or were hand-fed colostrum and were fed one of three physical forms of starter. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2145–2150.Google Scholar
Hamada, T, Maeda, S and Kameoka, K 1976. Factors influencing growth of rumen, liver and other organs in kids weaned from milk replacers to solid foods. Journal of Dairy Science 59, 1110–1118.Google Scholar
Hibbs, JW, Conrad, HR, Pounden, WD and Frank, N 1956. A high roughage system for raising calves based on early development of rumen function. VI. Influence of hay to grain ratio on calf performance, rumen development, and certain blood changes. Journal of Dairy Science 39, 171–179.Google Scholar
Hill, TM, Bateman, HG, Aldrich, JM and Schlotterbeck, RL 2008. Effects of the amount of chopped hay or cottonseed hulls in a textured calf starter on young calf performance. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 2684–2693.Google Scholar
Hill, TM, Bateman, HG, Aldrich, JM and Schlotterbeck, RL 2009. Roughage for diets fed to weaned dairy calves. Professional Animal Scientist 25, 283–288.Google Scholar
Hill, TM, Bateman, HG, Aldrich, JM and Schlotterbeck, RL 2010. Roughage amount, source, and processing for diets fed to weaned dairy calves. Professional Animal Scientist 26, 181–187.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J 1971. The development of solid food intake in calves. 1. The effect of previous experience of solid food, and the physical form of diets, on the development of food intake after weaning. Animal Production Science 13, 15–24.Google Scholar
Hoover, WH 1986. Chemical factors involved in ruminal fiber digestion. Journal of Dairy Science 69, 2755–2766.Google Scholar
Kellaway, RC, Thomson, DJ, Beever, DE and Osbourn, DF 1977. Effects of NaCl and NaHCO3 on food intake, growth rate, and acid-base balance in calves. Journal of Agriculture Science 88, 1–9.Google Scholar
Kertz, AF, Davidson, LE, Cords, BR and Puch, HC 1983. Ruminal infusion of ammonium chloride in lactating cows to determine effect of pH on ammonia trapping. Journal of Dairy Science 66, 2597–2601.Google Scholar
Khan, MA, Weary, DM, Varia, DM and von Keyserlingk, MAG 2012. Postweaning performance of heifers fed starter with and without hay during the milk-feeding period. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 3970–3976.Google Scholar
Khan, MA, Weary, DM and von Keyserlingk, MAG 2011. Hay intake improves performance and rumen development of calves fed higher quantities of milk. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 3547–3553.Google Scholar
Kincaid, RL 1980. Alternate methods of feeding alfalfa to calves. Journal of Dairy Science 63, 91–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, RD, Kincaid, RL, Hodgson, AS, Harrison, JH, Hillers, JK and Cronrath, JD 1987. Dietary fiber and early weaning on growth and rumen development of calves. Journal of Dairy Science 70, 2095–2104.Google Scholar
Laarman, AH and Oba, M 2011. Short communication: effect of calf starter on rumen pH of Holstein dairy calves at weaning. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 5661–5664.Google Scholar
Leibholz, J 1975. Ground roughage in the diet of the early-weaned calf. Animal Production Science 20, 93–100.Google Scholar
Mirzaei, M, Khorvash, M, Ghorbani, GR, Kazemi-Bonchenari, M, Riasi, A, Nabipour, A and van den Borne, JJGC 2015. Effects of supplementation level and particle size of alfalfa hay on growth characteristics and rumen development in dairy calves. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 99, 553–564. [Epub 14 July 2014].Google Scholar
Morrill, JL and Dayton, AD 1981. Method of feeding milk and access to fiber source for young calves. Journal of Dairy Science 64, 146–148.Google Scholar
Nocek, JE, Herbein, JH and Polan, CE 1980. Influence of ration physical form, ruminal degradable nitrogen and age on rumen epithelial propionate and acetate transport and some enzymatic activities. Journal of Nutrition 110, 2355–2364.Google Scholar
Phillips, CJC 2004. The effects of forage provision and group size on the behavior of calves. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 1380–1388.Google Scholar
Porter, JC, Warner, RG and Kertz, AF 2007. Effect of fiber level and physical form of starter on growth and development of dairy calves fed no forage. Professional Animal Scientist 23, 395–400.Google Scholar
Rooney, LW and Pflugfelder, RL 1986. Factors affecting starch digestibility with special emphasis on sorghum and corn. Journal of Animal Science 63, 1607–1623.Google Scholar
Suarez, BJ, Van Reenen, CG, Beldman, G, van Delen, J, Dijkstra, J and Gerrits, WJJ 2006. Effects of supplementing concentrates differing in carbohydrate composition in veal calf diets: I. Animal performance and rumen fermentation characteristics. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 4365–4375.Google Scholar
Tamate, H, McGilliard, AD, Jacobson, NL and Getty, R 1962. Effect of various diets on the anatomical development of the stomach in the calf. Journal of Dairy Science 45, 408–420.Google Scholar
Thomas, DB and Hinks, CE 1982. The effect of changing the physical form of roughage on the performance of the early-weaned calf. Animal Production Science 35, 375–384.Google Scholar
van Ackeren, C, Steingasa, H, Hartungb, K, Funkc, R and Drochnera, W 2009. Effect of roughage level in a total mixed ration on feed intake, ruminal fermentation patterns and chewing activity of early-weaned calves with ad libitum access to grass hay. Journal of Animal Feed Science and Technology 153, 48–59.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ 1994. ‘Function of the ruminant forestomach’. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Cornell University Press, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. pp. 230–252.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA 1991. Carbohydrate methodology, metabolism and nutritional implications in dairy cattle. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Zitnan, R, Voigt, J, Schonhusen, U, Wegner, J, Kokardova, M, Hagemeister, H, Levkut, M, Kuhla, S and Sommer, A 1998. Influence of dietary concentrate to forage ratio on the development of rumen mucosa in calves. Archives of Animal Nutrition 51, 279–291.Google Scholar