Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:23:39.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of protein supplementation on ruminal parameters and microbial community fingerprint of Nellore steers fed tropical forages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2015

C. B. P. Bento ,
A. C. Azevedo ,
D. I. Gomes ,
E. D. Batista ,
L. M. A. Rufino ,
E. Detmann  and
H. C. Mantovani
C. B. P. Bento
Affiliation:
Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
A. C. Azevedo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
D. I. Gomes
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
E. D. Batista
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
L. M. A. Rufino
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
E. Detmann
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
H. C. Mantovani*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
*
†E-mail: hcm6@ufv.br
Get access

Abstract

In tropical regions, protein supplementation is a common practice in dairy and beef farming. However, the effect of highly degradable protein in ruminal fermentation and microbial community composition has not yet been investigated in a systematic manner. In this work, we aimed to investigate the impact of casein supplementation on volatile fatty acids (VFA) production, specific activity of deamination (SAD), ammonia concentration and bacterial and archaeal community composition. The experimental design was a 4×4 Latin square balanced for residual effects, with four animals (average initial weight of 280±10 kg) and four experimental periods, each with duration of 29 days. The diet comprised Tifton 85 (Cynodon sp.) hay with an average CP content of 9.8%, on a dry matter basis. Animals received basal forage (control) or infusions of pure casein (230 g) administered direct into the rumen, abomasum or divided (50 : 50 ratio) in the rumen/abomasum. There was no differences (P>0.05) in ruminal pH and microbial protein concentration between supplemented v. non-supplemented animals. However, in steers receiving ruminal infusion of casein the SAD and ruminal ammonia concentration increased 33% and 76%, respectively, compared with the control. The total concentration of VFA increased (P<0.05) in steers receiving rumen infusion of casein. SAD and the microbial protein concentration did not vary significantly among treatments during the feeding cycle, but mean SAD values were greater in steers supplemented in the rumen and rumen/abomasum. Ruminal ammonia concentration was positively correlated with SAD in animals receiving ruminal infusion of casein. Polymerase chain reaction–denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) analysis revealed low similarity between treatments, animals and time of sample collection. Richness analysis and determination of the Shannon–Wiener index indicated no differences (P>0.05) in species richness and diversity of γ-proteobacteria, firmicutes and archaea between non-supplemented Nellore steers and steers receiving casein supplementation in the rumen. However, species richness and the Shannon–Wiener index were lower (P<0.05) for the phylum bacteroidetes in steers supplemented with casein in the rumen compared with non-supplemented animals. Venn diagrams indicated that the number of unique bands varied considerably among individual animals and was usually higher in number for non-supplemented steers compared with supplemented animals. These results add new knowledge about the effects of ruminal and postruminal protein supplementation on metabolic activities of rumen microbes and the composition of bacterial and archaeal communities in the rumen of steers.

Keywords

beef cattlecaseinrumen degradable proteindeaminationmicrobial fingerprint
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 10 , Supplement 1 , January 2016 , pp. 44 - 54
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agle, M, Hristov, AN, Zaman, S, Schneider, C, Ndegwa, P and Vaddella, VK 2010. The effects of ruminally degraded protein on rumen fermentation and ammonia losses from manure in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 1625–1637.Google Scholar
Aguerre, MJ, Wattiaux, MA, Powell, JM, Broderick, GA and Arndt, C 2011. Effect of forage-to-concentrate ratio in dairy cow diets on emission of methane, carbon dioxide, and ammonia, lactation performance, and manure excretion. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 3081–3093.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 2004. Official methods of analysis vol. 2, 18th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Attwood, GT, Klieve, AV, Ouwerkerk, D and Patel, BKC 1998. Ammonia-hyperproducing bacteria from New Zealand ruminants. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 64, 1796–1804.Google Scholar
Bach, A, Calsamiglia, S and Stern, MD 2005. Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 88 (E. suppl.), E9–E21.Google Scholar
Bandyk, CA, Cochran, RC, Wickersham, TA, Titgemeyer, EC, Farmer, CG and Higgins, JJ 2001. Effect of ruminal vs postruminal administration of degradable protein on utilization of low-quality forage by beef steers. Journal of Animal Science 79, 225–231.Google Scholar
Bradford, M 1976. Photometric methods for protein determination. Procedures and analysis. Analytical Biochemistry 72, 248–254.Google Scholar
Calsamiglia, S, Ferret, A, Reynolds, CK, Kristensen, NB and Van Vuuren, AM 2010. Strategies for optimizing nitrogen use by ruminants. Animal 4, 1184–1196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaney, AL and Marbach, EP 1962. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clinical Chemistry 8, 130–132.Google Scholar
Cochran, WG and Cox, GM 1957. Experimental designs, 2nd edition. Wiley, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Costa, VAC, Detmann, E, Paulino, MF, Valadares Filho, SC, Carvalho, IPC and Monteiro, LP 2011. Consumo e digestibilidade em bovinos em pastejo durante o período das águas sob suplementação com fontes de compostos nitrogenados e de carboidratos. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40, 1788–1798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delong, EF 1992. Archaea in coastal marine environments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 89, 5685–5689.Google Scholar
Detmann, E and Valadares Filho, SC 2010. On the estimation of non-fibrous carbohydrates in feeds and diets. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 62, 980–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detmann, E, Valente, EEL, Batista, ED and Huhtanen, P 2014. An evaluation of the performance and efficiency of nitrogen utilization in cattle fed tropical grass pastures with supplementation. Livestock Science 162, 141–153.Google Scholar
Figueiras, JF, Detmann, E, Paulino, MF, Valente, TNP, Valadares Filho, SC and Lazzarini, I 2010. Intake and digestibility in cattle under grazing supplemented with nitrogenous compounds during dry season. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 39, 1303–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) 2011. Food outlook. Global market analysis. Retrieved February 2, 2014, from http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/al978e/al978e00.pdf Google Scholar
Hammer, O, Harper, DAT and Ryan, PD 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia electronica 4, 9. Retrieved April 15, 2014, from http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm Google Scholar
Huuskonen, A, Huhtanen, P and Joki-Tokola, E 2014. Evaluation of protein supplementation for growing cattle fed grass silage-based diets: a meta-analysis. Animal 8, 1653–1662.Google Scholar
Jami, E and Mizrahi, I 2012. Composition and similarity of bovine rumen microbiota across individual animals. PLoS One 7, e33306.Google Scholar
Lazzarini, I, Detmann, E, Sampaio, CB, Paulino, MF, Valadares Filho, SC, Souza, MA and Oliveira, FA 2009. Intake and digestibility in cattle fed low-quality tropical forage and supplemented with nitrogenous compounds. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 38, 2021–2030.Google Scholar
Licitra, G, Hernandes, TM and Van Soest, PJ 1996. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 57, 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcondes, MI, Gionbelli, MP, Valadares Filho, SC, Chizzotti, ML and Paulino, MF 2010. Exigências nutricionais de proteína para bovinos de corte. In Exigências nutricionais de zebuínos puros e cruzados BR-CORTE (ed. SC Valadares Filho, MI Marcondes, ML Chizzotti and PVR Paulino), pp. 113–133. DZO-UFV, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.Google Scholar
Mertens, DR 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International 85, 1217–1240.Google Scholar
Muhling, M, Woolven-Allen, J, Murrell, JC and Joint, I 2008. Improved group-specific PCR primers for denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of the genetic diversity of complex microbial communities. The ISME Journal 2, 379–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petri, RM, Forster, RJ, Yang, W, McKinnonand, JJ and McAllister, TA 2012. Characterization of rumen bacterial diversity and fermentation parameters in concentrate fed cattle with and without forage. Journal of Applied Microbiology 112, 1152–1162.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Retrieved, from http://www.R-project.org/ Google Scholar
Raskin, L, Stromley, JM, Rittmann, BE and Stahl, DA 1994. Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes to describe natural communities of methanogens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 60, 1232–1240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rychlik, JL and Russell, JB 2000. Mathematical estimations of hyper-ammonia producing ruminal bacteria and evidence for bacterial antagonism that decreases ruminal ammonia production. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 32, 121–128.Google Scholar
SAS Institute 2004. SAS user’s guide, version 9.1.SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Schloss, PD, Westcott, SL, Ryabin, T, Hall, JR, Hartmann, M, Hollister, EB, Lesniewski, RA, Oakley, BB, Parks, DH, Robinson, CJ, Sahl, JW, Stres, B, Thallinger, GG, Van Horn, DJ and Weber, CF 2009. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75, 7537–7541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegfried, BR, Ruckemann, H and Stumpf, G 1984. Method for the determination of organic acids in silage by high performance liquid chromatography. Landwirtschaftliche Forschung 37, 298–304.Google Scholar
Stevenson, DM and Weimer, PJ 2007. Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 75, 165–174.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2011. Livestock and poultry. World markets and trade. Retrieved February 2, 2014, from http://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/livestock_poultry.pdf Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ and Robertson, JB 1985. Analysis of forages and fibrous foods. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Wickersham, TA, Cochran, RC, Titgemeyer, EC, Farmer, CG, Klevesahl, EA, Arroquy, JI, Johnson, DE and Gnad, DP 2004. Effect of postruminal protein supply on the response to ruminal protein supplementation in beef steers fed a low-quality grass hay. Animal Feed Science and Technology 115, 19–36.Google Scholar
Zhou, M, Hernandez-Sanabria, E and Guan, LL 2010. Characterization of variation in rumen methanogenic communities under different dietary and host feed efficiency conditions, as determined by pcr-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76, 3776–3786.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bento supplementary material

Figures S1-S4

Download Bento supplementary material(File)
File 3.3 MB