Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:42:21.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of fat source and dietary fibers on feed intake, plasma metabolites, litter gain and the yield and composition of milk in sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2016

U. Krogh ,
T. S. Bruun ,
J. Poulsen  and
P. K. Theil
U. Krogh
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
T. S. Bruun
Affiliation:
SEGES Pig Research Centre, DK-1609 Copenhagen, Denmark
J. Poulsen
Affiliation:
SEGES Pig Research Centre, DK-1609 Copenhagen, Denmark Department of Swine Nutrition, DLG a.m.b.a, DK-1620 Copenhagen, Denmark
P. K. Theil*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
*
†E-mail: Peter.Theil@anis.au.dk
Get access

Abstract

Sow lactation diets often include fat sources without considering the impact on digestion, metabolism and performance. Fiber ingredients may reduce feed intake and are often completely excluded from lactation diets, although locally available ingredients may be cost-efficient alternatives to partly replace cereals in lactation diets. Thus, a standard lactation diet low in dietary fiber, and two high-fiber diets based on sugar beet pulp (SBP) or alfalfa meal (ALF) were formulated. The SBP diet was high in soluble non-starch polysaccharides (NSP), whereas ALF being high in insoluble NSP. Each diet was divided in three portions and combined with 3% soybean oil (SOYO), palm fatty acid distillate (PFAD), or glycerol trioctanoate (C8TG) as the dietary fat source. Equal amounts of metabolizable energy were fed to 36 second parity sows from day 105 of gestation and throughout lactation to study the impact on feed intake, plasma metabolites, milk production and litter performance. Backfat thickness and BW of sows were recorded on days 3, 17 and 28 of lactation; blood was sampled on days 3 and 17; milk samples were obtained on days 3, 10, 17 and 24 of lactation; and piglets were weighed on days 2, 7, 14, 21 and 28 of lactation. Litter gain and milk yield during late lactation were greater in sows fed C8TG or SOYO than in sows fed PFAD (P=0.05), whereas loss of BW (P=0.60) and backfat (P=0.70) was unaffected by fat source. Milk protein on days 3 and 10 of lactation were lower in C8TG and SOYO sows, than in PFAD sows (P<0.05). The lowest concentration of plasma lactate on day 3 (P<0.05) and plasma acetate on day 17 (P<0.05) was observed in C8TG sows. Milk yield was unaffected by fiber treatment (P=0.43), whereas milk protein concentration was lowest in ALF sows (P<0.05). Feed intake tended to be lower (P=0.09), and litter gain during the 3rd week of lactation was decreased (P<0.05) in SBP sows. In conclusion, performance was enhanced in SOYO and C8TG compared with PFAD sows, possibly associated with reduced energy intake in PFAD-fed sows. Furthermore, the SBP diet seemed to impair feed intake and litter gain at peak lactation, suggesting that effects of the dietary fiber fraction on energy intake determines the potential inclusion level of fiber-rich ingredients.

Keywords

fatfiberlactationmetabolismmilk production
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 6 , June 2017 , pp. 975 - 983
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auldist, DE, Carlson, D, Morrish, L, Wakeford, CM and King, RH 2000. The influence of suckling interval on milk production of sows. Journal of Animal Science 78, 2026–2031.Google Scholar
Auldist, DE, Morrish, L, Eason, P and King, RH 1998. The influence of litter size on milk production of sows. Animal Science 67, 333–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach Knudsen, KE 1997. Carbohydrate and lignin contents of plant materials used in animal feeding. Animal Feed Science and Technology 67, 319–338.Google Scholar
Bach Knudsen, KE 2001. The nutritional significance of ‘dietary fibre’ analysis. Animal Feed Science and Technology 90, 3–20.Google Scholar
Bligh, EG and Dyer, WJ 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology 37, 911–917.Google Scholar
Brighenti, F 1998. Summary of the conclusions of the working group on profibre interlaboratory study on determination of short chain fatty acids in blood. In Functional properties of non-digestible carbohydrates (ed. F Gullion, R Amadò, MT Amaral-Collaco, H Andersson, NG Asp, KE Bach Knudsen, M Champ, J Mathers, JA Robertson, I Rowland and J Van Loo), pp. 150–153. European Commission, DG XII, Science, Research and Development, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Danish Pig Research Centre 2013. Composition of feed ingredients (Fodermiddeltabel og beregning af i-faktor samt fordøjeligt indhold). DPRC, Axelborg, Copenhagen, Denmark (in Danish).Google Scholar
Hansen, AV, Strathe, AB, Kebreab, E, France, J and Theil, PK 2012. Predicting milk yield and composition in lactating sows: a Bayesian approach. Journal of Animal Science 90, 2285–2298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansen, B 1989. Determination of nitrogen as elementary-N, an alternative to Kjeldahl. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 39, 113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kajimoto, M, Ledee, DR, Olson, AK, Isern, NG, Des Rosiers, C and Portman, MA 2015. Differential effects of octanoate and heptanoate on myocardial metabolism during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in an infant swine model. American Journal of Physiology – Heart and Circulatory Physiology 309, H1157–H1165.Google Scholar
Krogh, U, Bruun, TS, Amdi, C, Flummer, C, Poulsen, J and Theil, PK 2015. Colostrum production in sows fed different sources of fiber and fat during late gestation. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 95, 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauridsen, C and Danielsen, V 2004. Lactational dietary fat levels and sources influence milk composition and performance of sows and their progeny. Livestock Production Science 91, 95–105.Google Scholar
National Research Council 2012. Nutrient requirements of swine, 11th revised edition. NRC, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Powles, J, Wiseman, J, Cole, DJA and Hardy, B 1994. Effect of chemical structure of fats upon their apparent digestible energy value when given to young pigs. Animal Production 58, 411–417.Google Scholar
Renaudeau, D, Anais, C and Noblet, J 2003. Effects of dietary fiber on performance of multiparous lactating sows in a tropical climate. Journal of Animal Science 81, 717–725.Google Scholar
Rossi, R, Pastorelli, G, Cannata, S and Corino, C 2010. Recent advances in the use of fatty acids as supplements in pig diets: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 162, 1–11.Google Scholar
Rotenberg, S and Andersen, JO 1980. Effect of dietary citrus pectin on fatty-acid balance and on the fatty-acid content of the liver and small-intestine in rats. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 30, 8–12.Google Scholar
Serena, A, Jorgensen, H and Knudsen, KEB 2009. Absorption of carbohydrate-derived nutrients in sows as influenced by types and contents of dietary fiber. Journal of Animal Science 87, 136–147.Google Scholar
Theander, O and Aman, P 1979. Studies on dietary-fibers. 1. Analysis and chemical characterization of water-soluble and water-insoluble dietary-fibers. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 9, 97–106.Google Scholar
Thingnes, SL, Ekker, AS, Gaustad, AH and Framstad, T 2012. Ad libitum versus step-up feeding during late lactation: the effect on feed consumption, body composition and production performance in dry fed loose housed sows. Livestock Science 149, 250–259.Google Scholar
Thingnes, SL, Gaustad, AH, Kjos, NP, Hetland, H and Framstad, T 2013. Pea starch meal as a substitute for cereal grain in diets for lactating sows: the effect on sow and litter performance. Livestock Science 157, 210–217.Google Scholar
Tybirk, P, Sloth, NM and Jørgensen, L 2012. Normer for næringsstoffer (Nutrient recommendations). Videncenter for svineproduktion (Danish Pig Research Centre), Copenhagen, Denmark, 1–10.Google Scholar
Vadmand, CN, Krogh, U, Hansen, CF and Theil, PK 2015. Impact of sow and litter characteristics on colostrum yield, time for onset of lactation, and milk yield of sows. Journal of Animal Science 93, 2488–2500.Google Scholar
Van den Brand, H, Heetkamp, MJW, Soede, NM, Schrama, JW and Kemp, B 2000. Energy balance of lactating primiparous sows as affected by feeding level and dietary energy source. Journal of Animal Science 78, 1520–1528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zentek, J, Buchheit-Renko, S, Ferrara, F, Vahjen, W, Van Kessel, A and Pieper, R 2011. Nutritional and physiological role of medium-chain triglycerides and medium-chain fatty acids in piglets. Animal Health Research Reviews 12, 83–93.Google Scholar