Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:31:16.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the way to functional agro biodiversity: coat colour gene variability in goats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2011

L. Nicoloso*
Affiliation:
Sezione di Zootecnica Agraria, Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Università degli Studi, Milano, Italy
R. Negrini
Affiliation:
Istituto di Zootecnica, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Piacenza, Italy Associazione Italiana Allevatori, Via G. Tomassetti 9, Rome, Italy
P. Ajmone-Marsan
Affiliation:
Istituto di Zootecnica, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Piacenza, Italy
P. Crepaldi
Affiliation:
Sezione di Zootecnica Agraria, Dipartimento di Scienze Animali, Università degli Studi, Milano, Italy
Get access

Abstract

Functional agro biodiversity defines the exploitation of biodiversity to provide ecosystem services, support sustainable agricultural production and benefit the regional and global environment and the public at large (ELN-FAB, 2009; www.eln_fab.eu). Tracking of animal products back to the breed of origin based on their genetic make-up undoubtedly falls in this category. The aim of this paper was to identify and validate a set of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in goat coat colour genes, most of which have not been investigated before, to trace five goat populations of the Italian Alps and their product. Several regions of 28 genes influencing coat colour pathways were amplified in eight animals (two per breed). Sequence comparison revealed 48 SNPs and three INDEL (INsertion DELetion). No breed-specific alleles were detected; however, several SNPs showed an uneven frequency distribution between breeds. In BIO, the genotype frequency distribution of a non-synonymous SNP suggested a possible role of TYRP1 in brown eumelanic goat coat colour. A total of 29 independent SNPs in 20 genes were selected and used to allocate 159 minimally related goat samples using STRUCTURE 2.2 and GeneClass 2 software. STRUCTURE 2.2 assigns 99% of individuals to the correct breed considering the prior information on putative breed of origin for each sample and 81% using only the genotypic data. The three algorithms available in GeneClass 2 performed with nearly equal efficiency, with 86% and 87% correct allocations. All the methods yielded an average probability of assignment >0.92 and a specificity index >0.86. Despite their coat colour variability, individuals belonging to ORO were fully assigned, showing that, in the absence of a breed-specific allele tied to coat colour, the best assignment resulted for the most genetically distinct breed. The lowest rate of correct assignment was observed in Verzaschese (73%), not ascertained in the breed panel used in the SNP discovery phase.

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajmone-Marsan, P, Negrini, R, Crepaldi, P, Milanesi, E, Gorni, C, Valentini, A, Cicogna, M 2001. Assessing genetic diversity in Italian goat populations using AFLP® markers. Animal Genetics 32, 281288.Google Scholar
Allendorf, FW, Luikart, G 2007. Conservation and the genetics of populations. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Antao, T, Lopes, A, Lopes, RJ, Beja-Pereira, A, Luikart, G 2008. A workbench to detect molecular adaptation based on a Fst-outlier method. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 323327.Google Scholar
Ballester, M, Mercadé, A, Van Haandel, B, Santamartina, J, Sánchez, A 2007. Individual identification and genetic traceability in the pig using the SNPlex™ genotyping system. Animal Genetics 38, 663665.Google Scholar
Baudouin, L, Lebrun, P 2001. An operational Bayesian approach for the identification of sexually reproduced cross-fertilized populations using molecular markers. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 546, 8193.Google Scholar
Beaumont, MA, Nichols, RA 1996. Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263, 16191626.Google Scholar
Belkhir, K, Borsa, P, Chikhi, L, Raufaste, N, Bonhomme, F (2004). GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows®_ pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5171, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier (France).Google Scholar
Bennet, DC, Lamoreux, ML 2003. The color loci of mice – a genetic century. Pigment Cell Research 16, 333344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryere, TG, Schmutz, SM, Schimpf, RJ, Cowan, CM, Potter, J 2003. TYRP1 is associated with dun coat colour in Dexter cattle or how now brown cow? Animal Genetics 34, 169175.Google Scholar
Boissy, RE, Zhao, H, Oetting, WS, Austin, LM, Wildenberg, SC, Boissy, YL, Zhao, Y, Sturm, RA, Hearing, VJ, King, RA, Nordlund, JJ 1996. Mutation in and lack of expression of tyrosinase-related protein-1 (TRP-1) in melanocytes from an individual with brown oculocutaneous albinism: a new subtype of albinism classified as ‘OCA3’. American Journal of Human Genetics 58, 11451156.Google Scholar
Bovine HapMap Consortium 2009. Genome-wide survey of SNP variation uncovers the genetic structure of cattle breeds. Science 324, 528532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cañón, J, García, D, García-Atance, MA, Obexer-Ruff, G, Lenstra, JA, Ajmone-Marsan, P, Dunner, S 2006. ECONOGENE Consortium Geographical partitioning of goat diversity in Europe and the Middle East. Animal Genetics 37, 327334.Google Scholar
Gratten, J, Beraldi, D, Lowder, BV, McRae, AF, Visscher, PM, Pemberton, JM, Slate, J 2007. Compelling evidence that a single nucleotide substitution in TYRP1 is responsible for coat-colour polymorphism in a free-living population of Soay sheep. Proceedings. Biological Sciences/The Royal Society 274, 619626.Google Scholar
Khatkar, MS, Zenger, KR, Hobbs, M, Hawken, RJ, Cavanagh, JAL, Barris, W, McClintock, AE, McClintock, S, Thomson, PC, Tier, B, Nicholas, FW, Raadsma, HW 2007. A primary assembly of a bovine haplotype block map based on a 15k SNP panel genotyped in Holstein–Friesian cattle. Genetics 176, 763772.Google Scholar
Lan, X, Pan, C, Zhang, L, Zhao, M, Zhang, C, Lei, C, Chen, H 2009. A novel missense (A79V) mutation of goat PROP1 gene and its association with production traits. Molecular Biology Reproduction 36, 20692073.Google Scholar
Lewontin, RC 1988. On measures of gametic disequilibrium. Genetics 120, 849852.Google ScholarPubMed
Liu, K, Muse, SV 2005. PowerMarker: integrated analysis environment for genetic marker data. Bioinformatics 21, 21282129.Google Scholar
Luikart, G, Gielly, L, Excoffier, L, Vigne, JD, Bouvet, J, Taberlet, P 2001. Multiple maternal origins and weak phylogeographic structure in domestic goats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98, 59275932.Google Scholar
Kijas, J, Wales, R, Törnsten, A, Chardon, P, Moller, M, Andersson, L 1998. Melanocortin Receptor 1 (MC1R) mutations and coat color in pigs. Genetics 150, 11771185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marklund, L, Johansson Moller, M, Sandberg, K, Andersson, L 1996. A missense mutation in the gene for melanocyte stimulating hormone receptor (MC1R) is associated with the chestnut color in horses. Mammalian Genome 7, 895899.Google ScholarPubMed
Maudet, C, Taberlet, P 2002. Holstein's milk detection in cheeses inferred from Melanocortin Receptor 1 (MC1R) gene polymorphism. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 707715.Google Scholar
Maudet, C, Luikart, G, Taberlet, P 2002. Genetic diversity and assignment tests among seven French cattle breeds based on microsatellite DNA analysis. Journal of Animal Science 80, 942950.Google Scholar
Negrini, R, Nicoloso, L, Crepaldi, P, Milanesi, E, Marino, R, Perini, D, Pariset, L, Dunner, S, Leveziel, H, Williams, JL, Ajmone Marsan, P 2008. Traceability of four Protected Geographic Indication (PGI) beef products using Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNP) and Bayesian statistics. Meat Science 80, 12121217.Google ScholarPubMed
Negrini, R, Nicoloso, L, Crepaldi, P, Milanesi, E, Colli, L, Chegdani, F, Pariset, L, Dunner, S, Leveziel, H, Williams, JL, Ajmone-Marsan, P 2009. Assessing SNP markers for assigning individuals to cattle populations. Animal Genetics 40, 1826.Google Scholar
Paetkau, D, Calvert, W, Stirling, I, Strobeck, C 1995. Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Molecular Ecology 4, 347354.Google Scholar
Pariset, L, Cappuccio, I, Ajmone-Marsan, P, Dunner, S, Luikart, G, England, PR, Obexer-Ruff, G, Peter, C, Marletta, D, Pilla, F, Valentini, A and ECONOGENE Consortium 2006. Assessment of population structure by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in goat breeds. Journal of Chromatography B, Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences 833, 117120.Google Scholar
Piry, S, Alapetite, A, Cornuet, JM, Paetkau, D, Baudouin, L, Estoup, A 2004. GeneClass2, a software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. Journal of Heredity 95, 536539.Google Scholar
Pritchard, JK, Stephens, M, Donnelly, P 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945959.Google Scholar
Rannala, B, Mountain, JL 1997. Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94, 91979221.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Kuntzel, A, Eizirik, E, O'Brien, SJ, Menotti-Raymond, M 2005. Tyrosinase and tyrosinase related protein 1 alleles specify domestic cat coat color phenotypes of the albino and brown loci. Journal of Heredity 96, 289301.Google Scholar
Schwagele, F 2005. Traceability from a European perspective. Meat Science 71, 164173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, GC, Tatum, JD, Belk, KE, Scanga, JA, Grandin, T, Sofos, JN 2005. Traceability from a US perspective. Meat Science 71, 174193.Google Scholar
Våge, DI, Fleet, MR, Ponz, R, Olsen, RT, Monteagudo, LV, Tejedor, MT, Arruga, MV, Gagilardi, R, Nattrass, GS, Klungland, H 2003. Mapping and characterization of the dominant black colour locus in sheep. Pigment Cell Research 16, 693697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weir, BS, Hill, WG 2002. Estimating F-statistics. Annual Review of Genetics 36, 721750.Google Scholar
Wu, ZL, Li, XL, Liu, YQ, Gong, YF, Liu, ZZ, Wang, XJ, Xin, XJ, Ji, Q 2006. The red head and neck of Boer goats may be controlled by the recessive allele of the MC1R gene. Animal Research 55, 313322.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Nicoloso Supplementary Tables

Nicoloso Supplementary Tables

Download Nicoloso Supplementary Tables(File)
File 109.6 KB