Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:35:35.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studying Africa's Large Numbers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2018

Boris Samuel
Boris Samuel*
Affiliation:
Chaire d’études africaines comparées, École de gouvernance et d’économie de Rabat (EGE) Centre de recherches internationales de Sciences Po (CERI)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Morten Jerven's work offers a historical perspective on the techniques used by national administrations and international organizations to quantify and analyze the growth of African economies. In his view, the work of statisticians and economists has largely failed to account for national economic and social realities since the beginning of the structural adjustment period. The informalization of economies, the weakness of statistical institutions, and the lack of methodological rigor among international experts have led to the production of statistical fictions. Jerven's analysis calls into question the usual narratives produced by quantitative economic history, such as that of an African economic failure since 1960. It also opens a dialogue with the sociology of quantification, highlighting cases where growth calculations appear arbitrary. However, his methodology suffers from a number of weaknesses. While his earliest works were based on detailed national case studies, Jerven's recent analyses have focused on the critique of continent-wide discourses, in particular international comparisons and econometric studies of growth. His work has thus moved away from a careful ethnography of numbers toward a focus on the denunciation of global practices. This shift prevents the author from making precise reflections on the various roles of numbers in African societies, the multiple positions and modes of action that quantification engages, or the specific historical trajectories which calculations of African growth are supposed to represent.

Type
The Economics of Contemporary Africa
Information
Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales - English Edition , Volume 71 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 557 - 579
Copyright
Copyright © Éditions EHESS 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article was translated from the French by Cadenza Academic Translations with the support of Cairn International's “Monthly Dossiers” program. It was edited by Chloe Morgan and Nicolas Barreyre.

*I would like to thank Agnès Labrousse and Vincent Bonnecase for their exchanges about Morten Jerven's work, which have greatly assisted me in formulating the analysis presented in this article.

References

1. Jerven, Morten, Poor Numbers: How We Are Misled by African Development Statistics and What to Do About It (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2013)Google Scholar.

2. Jerven, Morten, Africa: Why Economists Get It Wrong (London: Zed Books, 2015)Google Scholar.

3. Ferguson, James, The Anti-Politics Machine: “Development,” Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994)Google Scholar; Mitchell, Timothy, Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002)Google Scholar; Hibou, Béatrice, The Force of Obedience: The Political Economy of Repression in Tunisia, trans. Brown, Andrew (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011)Google Scholar; Boris Samuel, “La production macroéconomique du réel. Formalités et pouvoir au Burkina Faso, en Mauritanie et en Guadeloupe” (PhD diss., Institut d’études politiques, 2013); Davie, Grace, Poverty Knowledge in South Africa: A Social History of Human Science, 1855 – 2005 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Daniel Speich, “Travelling with the GDP through Early Development Economics’ History” (Working Papers on the Nature of Evidence: How Well Do ‘Facts’ Travel? no. 33/08, Department of Economic History, London School of Economics and Political Science, 2008).

4. Jerven, Africa, 1 – 11.

5. Jerven, Economic Growth and Measurement Reconsidered in Botswana, Kenya, Tanzania, and Zambia, 1965 – 1995 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 55.

6. Jerven, Poor Numbers, 36 – 41. Current work on citizenship considers registers rather than statistical censuses: see Breckenridge, Keith and Szreter, Simon, eds., Registration and Recognition: Documenting the Person in World History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7. Jerven, Poor Numbers; Jerven, Africa.

8. Jerven, Economic Growth. Among his edited volumes, see Jerven, Morten, ed., Measuring African Development: Past and Present (London: Routledge, 2015)Google Scholar, which I will discuss only briefly in this article.

9. Jerven, Poor Numbers, chap. 1. Jerven has also published various articles that develop his PhD thesis in detail. See, for example, Jerven, “The Relativity of Poverty and Income: How Reliable Are African Economic Statistics?” African Affairs 109, no. 434 (2010): 77 – 96.

10. Jerven, Africa, 12 – 44.

11. Jerven, Economic Growth.

12. Ibid., 188.

13. On the tradition of the sociology of quantification, see Desrosières, Alain and Thévenot, Laurent, Les catégories socioprofessionnelles (Paris: La Découverte, 1988)Google Scholar; Alain Desrosières, “Managing the Economy,” in The Cambridge History of Science, vol. 7, The Modern Social Sciences, ed. Theodore M. Porter and Dorothy Ross (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 553 – 64; Desrosières, The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning, trans. Camille Naish (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002); Porter, Theodore M., Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995)Google Scholar; Mespoulet, Martine, Construire le socialisme par les chiffres. Enquêtes et recensements en URSS de 1917 à 1991 (Paris: Institut national d’études démographiques, 2008)Google Scholar.

14. Jerven, Poor Numbers, 36 sq.

15. Jerven, Economic Growth, chaps. 1 and 3.

16. Jerven, Morten, “Un demi-siècle de fictions de croissance en Afrique,” Politique africaine 124 (2011): 29 – 42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17. Jerven, Poor Numbers, 11 – 17.

18. Jerven, Poor Numbers, chap. 1. In particular, the author shows that the various rankings are not consistent among themselves and that these differences cannot be explained by disparities between the methodologies used. These arguments are also developed in a number of his articles, for example Jerven, Morten, “Random Growth in Africa? Lessons from an Evaluation of the Growth Evidence on Botswana, Kenya, Tanzania and Zambia, 1965 – 1995,” Journal of Development Studies 46, no. 2 (2010): 274 – 94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19. Jerven, Poor Numbers, 96 sq.

20. Jerven, Africa, chaps. 1 and 2.

21. Jerven, Economic Growth, 66.

22. Jerven, Poor Numbers, 53.

23. Jerven, Africa, 2 – 3.

24. Ibid., 108.

25. Ibid., 4.

26. Cooper, Frederick and Packard, Randall M., eds., International Development and the Social Sciences: Essays on the History and Politics of Knowledge (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997)Google Scholar.

27. I am particularly thinking of the techniques of “developmentalist” states presented for example in Kelsall, Tim, Business, Politics, and the State in Africa: Challenging the Orthodoxies on Growth and Transformation (London: Zed Books, 2013)Google Scholar.

28. Burbank, Jane and Cooper, Frederick, Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010)Google Scholar.

29. Jerven, Poor Numbers, 50.

30. Bonnecase, Vincent, “Des revenus nationaux pour l'Afrique ? La mesure du développement en Afrique occidentale française dans les années 1950,” Canadian Journal of Development Studies 35, no. 1 (2014): 28 – 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31. See also Jerven, Morten, “Users and Producers of African Income: Measuring the Progress of African Economies,” African Affairs 110, no. 439 (2011): 169 – 90CrossRefGoogle Scholar. The process of fashioning standardized aggregates such as GDP began after World War II, but international normalization was not complete until 1968.

32. See in particular the case studies included in Jerven, Economic Growth.

33. On this point, see the view expressed by Agnès Labrousse in the present issue of the Annales: she believes that Jerven's work could provide much more ambitious conclusions at a historical level by identifying different “ways of acting on the economy” through numbers, expanding on the analyses of Desrosières in “Managing the Economy.”

34. Jerven, Poor Numbers, chap. 4.

35. Jerven, Africa, 10.

36. Nubukpo, Kako, “Les macroéconomistes africains : entre opportunisme théorique et improvisation empirique,” Politique africaine 124 (2011): 87 – 99CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37. For a contrasting example, see Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant, “Le ‘Washington Consensus.’ Contribution à une sociologie de l'hégémonie du néolibéralisme,” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 121, no. 1 (1998): 3 – 22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38. Along the lines of the approach taken in Keen, Steve, Debunking Economics: The Naked Emperor Dethroned? (London: Zed Books, 2011)Google Scholar, which criticizes current trends in the discipline of economics and the success of neoclassical economics.

39. Jerven, Africa, 62 – 65.

40. Unlike Antony Hopkins, whom he frequently cites, and who is much more critical. See Hopkins, Antony G., “The New Economic History of Africa,” Journal of African History 50, no. 2 (2009): 155 – 77CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here p. 173.

41. Jerven, Economic Growth, 18.

42. Jerven, Poor Numbers, 119; Jerven, Economic Growth, 148; Jerven, Africa, 5.

43. Jerven, Poor Numbers, 42; Jerven, “Un demi-siècle de fictions de croissance en Afrique”; Jerven, Africa, 19.

44. For an in-depth study of these points, see Agnès Labrousse, “Poor Numbers. Statistical Chains and the Political Economy of Numbers,” Annales HSS (English Edition) 71, no. 4 (2016): 507 – 38.

45. With reference to the work of Sally Engle Merry: see Jerven, Poor Numbers, xii.

46. He refers to Theodore Porter to consider the link between mutual trust and numbers, and to Mary Morgan for the link that she establishes between economic models and narratives. See Porter, Trust in Numbers; Morgan, Mary S., “Models, Stories and the Economic World,” Journal of Economic Methodology 8, no. 3 (2001): 361 – 84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47. McCloskey, Deirdre, The Rhetoric of Economics (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1998)Google Scholar; Jerven, Africa, 9.

48. Marcel J. Boumans, “Built-in Justification,” in Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, ed. Mary S. Morgan and Margaret Morrison (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 66 – 96.

49. Desrosières, Alain, Prouver et gouverner. Une analyse politique des statistiques publiques, ed. Didier, Emmanuel (Paris, La Découverte, 2014), 39Google Scholar.

50. Salais, Robert, “Réplique. Chiffre et objectivité : il y a convention et convention,” Cahiers droit, sciences et technologies 4 (2014): 45 – 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Emmanuel Didier, En quoi consiste l'amérique ? Les statistiques, le New Deal et la démocratie (Paris: La Découverte, 2009).

51. Porter, Trust in Numbers; Mary S. Morgan, “Learning from Models,” in Morgan and Morrison, Models as Mediators, 347 – 88; Mespoulet, Construire le socialisme par les chiffres.

52. Hopkins, “The New Economic History of Africa”; Jerven, Africa, chap. 1.

53. See his argument concerning path dependence and causality in economic history: Jerven, Africa, chap. 2. See also Jerven, Morten, “A Clash of Disciplines? Economists and Historians Approaching the African Past,” Economic History of Developing Regions 26, no. 2 (2011): 111 – 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar, a response to Fenske, James, “The Causal History of Africa: A Response to Hopkins,” Economic History of Developing Regions 25, no. 2 (2010): 177 – 212CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Fenske in turn responds to Fenske, Jerven in, “The Causal History of Africa: Replies to Jerven and Hopkins,” Economic History of Developing Regions 26, no. 2 (2011): 125 – 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54. Jerven, Africa, chap. 1.

55. Gervais, Raymond R. and Mandé, Issiaka, “Comment compter les sujets de l'Empire ? Les étapes d'une démographie impériale en AOF avant 1946,” Vingtième siècle. Revue d'histoire 95, no. 3 (2007): 63 – 74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56. Appadurai, Arjun, Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996)Google Scholar.

57. Serra, Gerardo, “An Uneven Statistical Topography: The Political Economy of Household Budget Surveys in Late Colonial Ghana, 1951 – 1957,” Canadian Journal of Development Studies 35, no. 1 (2014): 9 – 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58. Jean-François Bayart, The State in Africa: The Politics of the Belly, 2nd ed., trans. Mary Harper, Christopher Harrison, and Elizabeth Harrison (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009).

59. For example, Hodge, Joseph M., Hödl, Gerald, and Kopf, Martina, eds., Developing Africa: Concepts and Practices in Twentieth-Century Colonialism (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Speich, “Travelling with the GDP”; Cooper, Frederick, “Writing the History of Development,” Journal of Modern European History 8, no. 1 (2010): 5 – 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60. Samuel, Boris, “Economic Calculations, Instability, and (In)formalisation of the State in Mauritania, 2003 – 2011,” Canadian Journal of Development Studies 35, no. 1 (2014): 77 – 96CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61. Roitman, Janet, Fiscal Disobedience: An Anthropology of Economic Regulation in Central Africa (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004)Google Scholar; Bonnecase, “Des revenus nationaux pour l'Afrique.”

62. Fioramonti, Lorenzo, Gross Domestic Problem: The Politics Behind the World's Most Powerful Number (London: Zed Books, 2013)Google Scholar.

63. Fourquet, François, Les comptes de la puissance. Histoire de la comptabilité nationale et du plan (Paris: Éd. Recherches, 1980)Google Scholar.

64. Fioramonti, Gross Domestic Problem, 96; Martha Finnemore, “Redefining Development at the World Bank,” in Cooper and Packard, International Development and the Social Sciences, 203 – 27.

65. Fioramonti, Gross Domestic Problem, chap. 1.

66. Ibid., chap. 2. See, as early as the 1930s, the critique by economist Simon Kuznets, National Income and Capital Formation, 1919 – 1935: A Preliminary Report (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1937).

67. André Vanoli, Une histoire de la comptabilité nationale (Paris: La Découverte, 2002).

68. Séruzier, Michel, “Une discipline spécifique : la mesure en macroéconomie,” Statéco 90/91 (1998): 21 – 32Google Scholar; Séruzier, presentation given as part of the seminar “La croissance africaine, une fiction statistique ?” Centre de recherches internationales de Sciences Po, 2013.

69. GDP also raises interest in the rare cases where it passes the threshold fixed for middle-income countries, as Jerven points out in regard to Ghana in 2010.

70. Boris Samuel, “Calcul macroéconomique et modes de gouvernement : les cas de la Mauritanie et du Burkina Faso,” Politique africaine 124 (2011): 101 – 26.

71. AFRISTAT is an international organization created in 1993. Based in Bamako, it now covers twenty-two member countries.

72. Boris Samuel, “La production macroéconomique du réel,” chap. 1; Blaise Leenhardt and Jean-Joël Aerts, “Présentation du modèle macro-économique TABLO, modèle standard de projection à court--moyen terme de la CCCE,” Statéco 58/59 (1989): 49 – 82.

73. Hibou, Béatrice and Samuel, Boris, “Macroéconomie et politique en Afrique,” Politique africaine 124 (2011): 5 – 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74. Jerven, Poor Numbers, 96 sq.

75. For a detailed ethnography of the IMF, see Harper, Richard H. R., Inside the IMF: An Ethnography of Documents, Technology, and Organizational Action (San Diego: Academic Press, 1998)Google Scholar.

76. Samuel, “La production macroéconomique du réel,” 188 sq.

77. Levi, Giovanni, Inheriting Power: The Story of an Exorcist, trans. Cochrane, Lydia G. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988)Google Scholar.

78. Bourdieu, Pierre et al., Travail et travailleurs en Algérie (Paris: Mouton, 1963)Google Scholar; Desrosières, Prouver et gouverner, chap. 6.

79. Hart, Keith, “Informal Income Opportunities and Urban Employment in Ghana,” Journal of Modern African Studies 11, no. 1 (1973): 61 – 89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

80. Charmes, Jacques, “L'héritage d'AMIRA,” Statéco 100 (2006): 81 – 85Google Scholar. AMIRA was created by the INSEE, the Ministry for Cooperation, and the Office de la recherche scientifique et technique Outre-Mer (Office of overseas scientific and technical research, or ORSTOM), which is now the Institut de recherche pour le développement (Institute for development research, or IRD).

81. MacGaffey argues that Zaire's economic activity was in fact three times higher than official GDP during the 1980s. See MacGaffey, Janet, ed., The Real Economy of Zaire: An Anthropological Study (London: James Currey, 1991), 10 – 11Google Scholar.

82. Desrosières, Prouver et gouverner, 111 – 21.

83. Jerven, “Users and Producers of African Income”; Jerven, Poor Numbers, 36 – 40.

84. Hallu, René et al., “Réalités africaines et enquêtes budget-consommation,” Économie et statistique 11 (1970): 21 – 32CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Serra, “An Uneven Statistical Topography.”

85. Deane, Phyllis, Colonial Social Accounting (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1949; repr. 2011Google Scholar); Fortes, Meyer, Steel, Robert W., and Ady, Peter, “Ashanti Survey, 1945 –46: An Experiment in Social Research,” Geographical Journal 110, no. 4/6 (1947): 149 – 77CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Regarding the French colonies, see Binet, Jacques, “Budgets familiaux des planteurs de cacao au Cameroun,” L'homme et l'outre-mer 3 (1956): 15Google Scholar; Pauvert, Jean-Claude and Lancrey-Javal, Jean-Luc, Le groupement d'Evodoula, Cameroun. Étude socio-économique (Paris: ORSTOM, 1957)Google Scholar.

86. Hallu et al., “Réalités africaines.”

87. Couty, Philippe, “Des éléments aux systèmes. Réflexions sur les procédés de généralisation dans les enquêtes de niveau de vie en Afrique,” Statéco 30 (1982): 18 – 54Google Scholar. See also Jean-Marc Gastellu, “Mais, où sont donc ces unités économiques que nos amis cherchent tant en Afrique ?” (working note 26, AMIRA, 1978), 99 – 122.

88. Guyer, Jane I., “Household and Community in African Studies,” African Studies Review 24, no. 2/3 (1981): 87 – 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

89. Randall, Sara, Coast, Ernestina, and Leone, Tiziana, “Cultural Constructions of the Concept of Household in Sample Surveys,” Population Studies: A Journal of Demography 65, no. 2 (2011): 217 – 29CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

90. Ibid.

91. Jane I. Guyer and Christopher Udry, “Balances: Household Budgets in a Ghanaian Study,” in Marginal Gains: Monetary Transactions in Atlantic Africa, ed. Jane I. Guyer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004), 131 – 71; Christopher Udry and Hyungi Woo, “Households and the Social Organization of Consumption in Southern Ghana,” African Studies Review 50, no. 2 (2007): 139 – 53.

92. Polly Hill, “Some Puzzling Spending Habits in Ghana,” Economic Bulletin [of the Economic Society of Ghana] 10 (1957): 3 – 11, cited in Guyer, Marginal Gains, 131.

93. Guyer, Marginal Gains, 134.

94. Ibid., 135.

95. Ibid., 141.

96. Ibid., 131 – 32.

97. Hill, “Some Puzzling Spending Habits,” cited in Guyer, Marginal Gains, 131.

98. See the introduction to Jerven, Measuring African Development, 1 – 8.

99. See Jerven, Africa, 102 sq., on the debate that he held with Shantayanan Devarajan, chief economist of World Bank Africa, about the existence of a “statistical tragedy in Africa.”

100. Statisticians cite in return the inability of monographs to provide a transversal view of society: see Alain Desrosières, “L'opposition entre deux formes d'enquête : monographie et statistique” [1988], in L'Argument statistique, vol. 1, Pour une sociologie historique de la quantification (Paris: Presses de l’École des mines, 2008).

101. According to the analytical approach classically used in the sociology of quantification, notably Desrosières and Thévenot, Les catégories socioprofessionnelles. On the metaphor of the production line, see Thévenot, Laurent, “From Social Coding to Economics of Convention: A Thirty-Year Perspective on the Analysis of Qualification and Quantification Investments,” Historical Social Research 41, no. 2 (2016): 7 – 10Google Scholar.

102. Harper, Inside the IMF; Speich, “Travelling with the GDP.”

103. Hibou, Béatrice, “Macroéconomie et domination politique en Tunisie,” Politique africaine 124 (2011): 127 – 54CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Samuel, “La production macroéconomique du réel,” 187 – 222.

104. Boumans, Marcel, Science Outside the Laboratory: Measurement in Field Science and Economics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Latour, Bruno, “Le topofil de Boa-Vista. La référence scientifique : montage photo-philosophique,” Raisons pratiques 4 (1993): 187 – 216Google Scholar; Didier, En quoi consiste l'Amérique, 19 – 77.

105. Hibou, Béatrice, La bureaucratisation du monde à l’ère néolibérale (Paris: La Découverte, 2012)Google Scholar, 172.

106. Thévenot, “From Social Coding to Economics of Convention”; Geoffrey C. Bowker and Susan Leigh Star, Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences (Cambridge: Mit Press, 1999); Espeland, Wendy Nelson and Stevens, Mitchell L., “Commensuration as a Social Process,” Annual Review of Sociology 24 (1998): 312 – 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

107. Jerven, Poor Numbers, 8 – 32; Jerven, Africa, chaps. 1 and 2.

108. As was the case for neoclassical economics: see Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant, The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

109. See the references given in notes 84 to 93 above.