Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T18:23:34.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Mounds of Macedonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2013

Extract

A recent journey has given me the opportunity of verifying and supplementing the observations on the prehistoric sites of Macedonia made by Mr. M. S. Thompson and myself in 1909. The following remarks are to be considered merely as notes intended to assist in the future exploration of Macedonian prehistoric mounds, as they are based on observation and not on excavation.

In 1911 we noted a prehistoric settlement on a bluff on the right bank of the Haliakmon just above the Serfije end of the bridge over the river on the Kozane-Serfije road. The mound directly overlooks the bridge-head and is skirted on the west by the high road. The fields round are known as Emir Chaiir. In our previous examination of the mound Mr. Thompson and I found only plain hand-made prehistoric potsherds which possessed no sufficiently marked characteristics to enable us to determine to what group they belonged.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 123 note 1 Liverpool Annals, ii (1909), pp. 159 ff.

page 123 note 2 Wace-Thompson, , Prehistoric Thessaly, p. 254Google Scholar, note 2; B.S.A. xviii, p. 187. The town of Serfije is in Greek called Servia (Σέρβια), or vulgarly and locally Serria, but to avoid the confusion, which would be inevitable if one wrote Servia in English, it seems better to use the Turkish name Serfije.

page 123 note 3 Wace-Thompson, op. cit. pp. 13 ff.

page 124 note 1 Wace-Thompson, op. cit. p. 12.

page 124 note 2 Arvanitopoullos, (Πρακτικά, 1912, p. 240)Google Scholar reports two prehistoric mounds near Topsilar, to the east of Kozane, but the report is not yet confirmed.

page 124 note 3 The principal references to the Macedonian Tumuli are: Chrysochoos, , Ἐπετηρὶς τοῦ Παρνασσοῦ, 1896, pp. 9 ff.Google Scholar; Heuzey, , Mont Olympe, pp. 172 ff., 200Google Scholar; Heuzey-Daumet, , Mission de Macédoine, pp. 226 ff., 243 ff., 412, Pls. 15–21Google Scholar; Kinch, , Archaeologisk Rejse i Makedonien, pp. 10 ff.Google Scholar with Plate; Körte, , Ath. Mitt. 1899, pp. 41 ff.Google Scholar, Gordion, p. 8 ff.; Leake, , Northern Greece, iii, p. 260, etc.Google Scholar; Bey, Macridy, Jahrbuch, 1911, pp. 193 ff.Google Scholar; Schmidt, , Zeit. ƒ. Ethnologie, 1905, pp. 91 ff.Google Scholar; Struck, , Makedonische Fahrten, ii, pp. 46, 53, 89, etc.Google Scholar; Traeger, , Zeit. ƒ. Ethnologie, 1902, pp. 62 ff.Google Scholar; Wace-Thompson, , Liverpool Annals, ii (1909), pp. 159 ff.Google Scholar

page 125 note 1 Jahrbuch, 1911, pp. 193 ff.

page 125 note 2 Ἐπετηρὶς τοῦ Παρνασσοῦ, 1896, p. 12.

page 125 note 3 Traeger (op. cit. fig. 8) says it is on the right bank.

page 125 note 4 Op. cit. ii. p. 88.

page 125 note 5 Opp. citt., locc. citt., plans given by Leake and Chrysochoos.

page 125 note 6 Op. cit. pp. 10 ff.

page 125 note 7 Struck, op. cit. pp. 45 ff.; Heuzey, , Mission de Macédoine, p. 233, Plan C.Google Scholar

page 126 note 1 Heuzey, op. cit. pp. 243 ff. Pls. 17–21; cf. id.Mont Olympe, pp. 172 ff.

page 126 note 2 Chrysochoos, op. cit. p. 13.

page 126 note 3 Archaeologia, vol. 49, p. 109.

page 126 note 4 Op. cit. p. 88.

page 126 note 5 J.H.S. 1900, pp. 20 ff.

page 126 note 6 Πρακτικά, 1907, pp. 153 ff.; Ἐφ. Ἀρχ., 1909, pp. 27 ff.

page 126 note 7 Wace-Thompson, , Prehistoric Thessaly, p. 54.Google Scholar

page 126 note 8 B.C.H. 1901, pp. 156 ff.

page 126 note 9 Kretschmer, , Glotta, vi. pp. 74 ff.Google Scholar

page 126 note 10 B.S.A. xvii, pp. 76 ff.

page 126 note 11 Ath. Mitt. 1908, pp. 365 ff.

page 127 note 1 Minns, , Scythians and Greeks, pp. 415 ff.Google Scholar

page 127 note 2 Herodotus, iv. 95, v. 8.

page 127 note 3 Chrysochoos (op. cit. p. 12) mentions many other mounds, but without exploration it is impossible to say to which class they should be assigned.

page 127 note 4 Körte, , Ath. Mitt. 1899, pp. 41 ff.Google Scholar

page 128 note 1 Struck, , Makedonische Fahrten, i. pp. 39, 40.Google Scholar

page 128 note 2 Ibid.

page 128 note 3 Cf. Traeger, op. cit. p. 68.

page 129 note 1 Cf. Chrysochoos, op. cit. p. 12.

page 129 note 2 Zeit. ƒ. Ethnologie, 1905, p. 98, figs. 6 ff.

page 129 note 3 Wace-Thompson, , Prehistoric Thessaly, pp. 19, 21.Google Scholar

page 130 note 1 Wace-Thompson, op. cit. pp. 98, 103, 104, 203, Figs. 50, 53, 54, 142.

page 130 note 2 Wace-Thompson, op. cit. pp. 16, 17.

page 130 note 3 Wace-Thompson, op. cit. pp. 21, 185 ff.

page 130 note 4 Zeit. ƒ. Ethnologie, 1905, p. 108.

page 130 note 5 Wace-Thompson, op. cit. p. 17.

page 130 note 6 Ibid.

page 131 note 1 Traeger, op. cit. Fig. 5.

page 131 note 2 Traeger, op. cit. Fig. 6: placed by him on the left bank.

page 131 note 3 Traeger, op. cit. Fig. 9: placed by him on the right bank.

page 131 note 4 Δημίτσας, Μακεδονία, pp. 604, 641 ff.

page 132 note 1 Struck, , Makedonische Fahrten, i, pp. 38 ff.Google Scholar; Chrysochoos, , Ἐπετηρìς τοῦ Παρνασσοῦ, 1899, pp. 142 ff.Google Scholar

page 132 note 2 Struck, op. cit. i. pp. 39, 56.