Acknowledgement. I would like to acknowledge the help and advice of Professor J. Boardman and Dr O. Palagia.

Abbreviations In addition to standard abbreviations, I have used the following:

Addenda Burn, L. and Glynn, R., Beazley Addenda (Oxford 1982).Google Scholar

Eye of Greece Kurtz, D. C. and Sparkes, B. A. (eds.), The Eye of Greece (Cambridge 1982).Google Scholar

Smith Smith, C., BSA 3 (1896–1897) 121–48.Google Scholar

Vian, Répertoire Vian, F., Répertoire des Gigantomachies Figurées dans l'Art Grec et Romain (Paris 1951).Google Scholar

von Salis von Salis, A., JdI 55 (1940) 90–169.Google Scholar

¹ Most recently, Parthenon-Kongress Basel (Mainz 1984) 177–96 with notes and bibliographies.

² Leningrad St. 1792. ARV ² 1476.1. Para 496. Addenda 192. von Salis 100 fig. 9. The figures are noted by Furtwängler and Reichhold without comment (FR 2.53), by von Salis, and by von Bothmer, who says, ‘the scale is too small and the distortions too pronounced to help in the reconstruction of the original’, Amazons in Greek Art (Oxford 1957) 214.Google Scholar

³ The sources are collected in Michaelis, A., Der Parthenon (Leipzig 1871) 328.Google Scholar

⁴ Pollitt, J. J., The Ancient View of Greek Art (Yale 1974) 106Google Scholar n. 4.

⁵ A History of Greek Art (Cambridge 1975) 312.

⁶ Hesperia 8 (1939) 298.

⁷ Smith 133.

⁸ Naples 2045. ARV ² 1338. Para 481. Addenda 183. Vian, Répertoire no. 389 pl. 44.

⁹ Karlsruhe 259. ARV ² 1315.1. Para 477. Addenda 180. CVA pls 22.4.5, 23, 24.1 5.

¹⁰ Leningrad, Baksy 8. Eye of Greece 149 81 pls. 41 5a

¹¹ AZ 23 (1865) 33–48 pls. 196 7. BMC Sculpture 1 (1892) no. 302 (A. H. Smith).

¹² Smith 137.

¹³ von Salis 99 (‘in enger Beziehung zum Schilde der Athena Parthenos steht’).

¹⁴ AM 69–70 (1954–5) 101 (‘von allen Darstellungen kann nur die des Neapler kraters eine Beziehung zur Schildgigantomachie haben’ (Walter's italics)).

¹⁵ Leipen, N., Athena Parthenos: A Reconstruction (Toronto 1971) 48.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Vian, F., La Guerre des Géants (Paris 1952) 149–50.Google Scholar Vian is right not to take the depiction of giants lifting rocks as a derivation from the Parthenos, as it occurs on earlier vases, for example, London E 165 of c. 480–470 (ARV ² 294.62. Addenda 105. CVA 5 pl. 71.3).

¹⁷ von Salis 98.

¹⁸ Smith 137.

¹⁹ e.g. in the tondo of Berlin 2531, a cup of the last quarter of the fifth century (ARV ² 1318.1. Para 478. Addenda 181. Vian, Répertoire no. 388 pl. 43).

²⁰ The metopes are best illustrated in Brommer, F., Die Metopen des Parthenon (Mainz 1967).Google Scholar

²¹ Berlin 2293. ARV ² 370.10. Para 365, 367. Addenda 111. Vian, Répertoire no. 334 pl. 35.

²² Athens NM 0.11. RA 1972, 223 figs. 1, 2. On the painter, Williams, D., JBerlMus 18 (1976) 12.Google Scholar

²³ FR 1.142.

²⁴ 158.

²⁵ Eye of Greece 159.

²⁶ 121 (‘nichts anderes als jenes Gemäldes des Parthenosschildes selbst!’).

²⁷ J. Boardman, Eye of Greece 21.