Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:30:43.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

2. RESEARCH IN THE TEACHING OF SPEAKING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2004

Michael McCarthy  and
Anne O'Keeffe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This chapter reviews research and practice in six main areas relevant to the teaching of speaking: (1) the growing influence of spoken corpora, (2) the debates concerning native speaker (NS) and nonnative speaker (NNS) models for spoken pedagogy,(3) the issue of authenticity in spoken materials, (4) approaches to understanding speaking in the classroom, (5) the selection of texts and aspects of spoken language for the teaching of speaking, and (6) developments in materials and methods for the teaching of speaking. Spoken corpora, whether NS corpora collected in “old” or “new” variety locations or NNS corpora based on learner data or expert/successful user data, have generated vigorous debate as to how spoken language should be modeled for teaching, and their influence is being seen in shifts in methodology toward language-awareness-based approaches as well as new materials based on lexicogrammatical and discoursal corpus evidence. Various approaches to understanding classroom speaking are also reviewed, including discourse analysis, conversation analysis, cognitive approaches, and the Vygotskian perspective. Applications of insights from these approaches are reviewed, especially how the approaches affect the selection of texts and language features to be taught. Finally, practical discussion on the teaching of specific spoken genres is reviewed and probable future directions are discussed.

Type
RESEARCH IN TEACHING LANGUAGE SKILLS
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 24 , January 2004 , pp. 26 - 43
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aston G., & Burnard L. 1998 The BNC handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Banjo A. 1996 The sociolinguistics of English in Nigeria and the ICE project. In S. Greenbaum(Ed.), Comparing English world-wide: The International Corpus of English (pp. 239– 248). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barnard R. 1997 Good news, bad news: News stories for listening and discussion Student book. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beeching K. 1997 French for specific purposes: The case for spoken corpora. Applied Linguistics, 18, 374– 394.Google Scholar
Billmyer K., & Varghese M. 2000 Investigating instrument-based pragmatic variability: Effects of enhancing discourse completion tests. Applied Linguistics, 21, 517– 552.Google Scholar
Bolton K., Gisborne N., Hung J., & Nelson G. 2003 The International Corpus of English project in Hong Kong. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Boyer S. 2003 Understanding spoken English: A focus on everyday language in context. Glenbrook, NSW: Boyer Educational Resources.
Burns A. 1998 Teaching speaking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 102– 123.Google Scholar
Burns A., Gollin S., & Joyce H. 1997 Authentic spoken texts in the language classroom. Prospect, 12, 72– 86.Google Scholar
Bygate M. 1998 Theoretical perspectives on speaking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 20– 42.Google Scholar
Carter R. 1997 Speaking Englishes, speaking cultures, using CANCODE. Prospect, 12, 4– 11.Google Scholar
Carter R. 1998 Orders of reality: CANCODE, communication and culture. ELT Journal, 52, 43– 56.Google Scholar
Carter R., Hughes R., & McCarthy M. J. 2000 Exploring grammar in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheng W., & Warren M. 1999 Facilitating a description of intercultural conversations: The Hong Kong Corpus of conversational English. ICAME Journal, 23, 5– 20.Google Scholar
Cheng W. & Warren M. 2000 The Hong Kong Corpus of Spoken English: Language learning through language description. In L. Burnard & T. McEnery, Rethinking language pedagogy from a corpus perspective(pp. 133– 144). Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
Clennell C. 1999 Promoting pragmatic awareness and spoken discourse skills within EAP classes. ELT Journal, 53, 83– 91.Google Scholar
Coffin C. 2001 Theoretical approaches to written language–-a TESOL perspective. In A. Burns & C. Coffin (Eds.), Analysing English in a global context: A reader (pp. 93– 122). London: Routledge.
Cunningham Florez M. 1999 Improving adult English language learners' speaking skills. ERIC Digest, June 1999.(ED425304). National Center for ESL Literacy Education. Retrieved September, 2003, from http://www.cal.org/ncle/digests/Speak.htm.
Deacon B. 2000 Sp-Stories-lit. The Language Teacher, 24, 32– 33.Google Scholar
De Cock S. 1998 A recurrent word combination approach to the study of formulae in the speech of native and non-native speakers of English.International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 3, 59– 80.Google Scholar
De Cock S. 2000 Repetitive phrasal chunkiness and advanced EFL speech and writing. In C. Mair & M. Hundt (Eds.), Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory. Papers from the Twentieth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized corpora (ICAME 20), Freiburg im Breisgau 1999 (pp. 51– 68). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Di Vito N. 1998 Patterns across spoken and written French. Empirical researchon the interaction among forms, functions and genres. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Dörnyei Z., & Thurrell S. 1994 Teaching conversational skills intensively: Course content and rationale. ELT Journal, 48, 40– 49.Google Scholar
Ducharme D., & Bernard R. 2001 Communication breakdowns: An exploration of contextualization in native and non-native speakers of French. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 825– 847.Google Scholar
Farr F., Murphy B., & O'Keeffe A. (In press). The Limerick Corpus of Irish English: Design, description and application. Teanga, 21.
Flowerdew J. 2000 Globalization discourse: A view from the East. Discourse and Society, 13, 209– 225.Google Scholar
Folse K.S., & Ivone J. A. 2002a I. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Folse K. S., & Ivone J. A. 2002b More discussion starters: Activities for building speaking fluency. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Foster P., Tonkyn A., & Wigglesworth G. 2000 Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21, 354– 375.Google Scholar
Golato A. 2003 Studying compliment responses: A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk. Applied Linguistics, 23, 90– 121.Google Scholar
Granger S., Hung J., & Petch-Tyson S. (Eds). 2002 Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Green C. F., Christopher E. R., & Lam J. 2002 Developing discussion skills in the ESL classroom. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practices (pp. 225– 233). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hall J. K., & Walsh M. 2002 Teacher–student interaction and language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 186– 203.Google Scholar
Holmes J. 1996 The New Zealand spoken component of ICE: Some methodological challenges. In S. Greenbaum (Ed.), Comparing English World-Wide: The International Corpus of English (pp. 163– 178). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hunston S. 2002 Pattern grammar, language teaching and linguistic variation. In R. Reppen, S. Fitzmaurice, & D. Biber (Eds.), Using corpora to explore linguistic variation (pp. 167– 183). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Ide N., & Macleod C. 2001 The American National Corpus: A standardized resource of American English. Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2001, Lancaster, UK: University of Lancaster. Retrieved September, 2003, from http://americannationalcorpus.org/pubs.html.
Ide N., Reppen R., & Suderman K. 2002 The American National Corpus: More than the web can provide. In Proceedings of the Third Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) (pp. 839– 44). Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain. Retrieved September 2003 from http://americannationalcorpus.org/pubs.html.
Jones R. E. 2001 A consciousness-raising approach to the teaching of conversational story telling skills. ELT Journal, 55, 155– 163.Google Scholar
Jones R. E. 2002 We used to do this and we'd also do that: A discourse pattern for teaching the reminiscence story. The Language Teacher 26 (2). Retrieved September, 2003, from http://langue.hyper.chubu.ac.jp/jalt/pub/tlt/02/feb/jones.html.Google Scholar
Kallen J. L., & Kirk J. M. 2001 Convergence and divergence in the verb phrase in Irish standard English: A corpus-based approach. In J. M. Kirk & D. P. ÓBaoill(Eds.), Language links: The languages of Scotland and Ireland (pp. 59– 79). Belfast: Cló Ollscoil na Banríona.
Kasper G. 2001 Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development. Applied Linguistics, 22, 502– 530.Google Scholar
Kehe D. 1998 Discussion strategies. Brattleboro, VT: Pro Lingua Associates.
Kern R. 2000 Literacy and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kinginger C. 1999 Videoconferencing as access to spoken French. Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 468– 489.Google Scholar
Kinginger C. 2002 Defining the zone of proximal development in US foreign language education. Applied Linguistics, 23, 240– 261.Google Scholar
Ko. J., Schallert D. L., & Walters K. 2003 Rethinking scaffolding: Examining negotiation of meaning in an ESL storytelling task. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 303– 324.Google Scholar
Lam W., & Wong J. 2000 The effects of strategy training on developing discussion skills in an ESL classroom. ELT Journal, 54, 245– 255Google Scholar
Lantolf J. P. 2000 Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf J. P., & Appel G. (Eds). 1998 Vygotskyan approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Lawson A. 2001 Rethinking French grammar for pedagogy: The contribution of spoken corpora. In R. C. Simpson & J. M. Swales (Eds.), Corpus linguistics in North America: Selections from the 1999 Symposium (pp. 179– 194). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Lee D. 2001 Genres, registers, text types, domains, and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning & Technology, 5, 37– 72.Google Scholar
Leung C., Harris R., & Rampton B. 1997 The idealised native speaker, reified ethnicities, and classroom realities. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 543– 558.Google Scholar
Lynch T., & Maclean J. 2001 ‘A case of exercising’: Effects of immediate task repetition on learners' performance. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 141– 162). Harlow, UK: Pearson.
Machado A. 2000 A Vygotskian approach to evaluation in foreign language learning contexts. ELT Journal, 54, 335– 345.Google Scholar
McCarthy M. J. 1998 Spoken language and applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy M. J. 2001 Issues in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy M. J. 2002 Good listenership made plain: British and American nonminimal response tokens in everyday conversation. In R. Reppen, S. Fitzmaurice & D. Biber (Eds.), Using corpora to explore linguistic variation (pp. 49– 71). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
McCarthy M. J. 2003 Talking back: ‘Small’ interactional response tokens in everyday conversation. Research on Language in Social Interaction, 36, 33– 63.Google Scholar
McCarthy M. J., & Carter R. A. 2001 Ten criteria for a spoken grammar. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 51– 75). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Measday E. 1998 Speak out!: Authentic communication activities for the intermediate and advanced ESL student. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Moon R. 1997 Vocabulary connections: Multi-word items in English. In N. Schmitt & M. J. McCarthy (Eds.), Second language vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 40– 63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mori J. 2002 Task design, plan, and development of talk-in-interaction: A analysis of a small group activity in a Japanese language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 23, 323– 347.Google Scholar
Morita N. 2000 Discourse socialization through oral classroom activities in a TESL graduate program. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 279– 310.Google Scholar
Nassaji H. & Swain M. 2000 A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9, 34– 51.Google Scholar
Nelson G., Wallis S., & Aarts B. 2002 Exploring natural language: Working with the British component of the International Corpus of English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Nero S. J. 2000 The changing faces of English: A Caribbean perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 483– 510.Google Scholar
Norrick N. R. 2000 Conversational narrative: Storytelling in everyday talk. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Ohta A. S. 2001 Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
O'Keeffe A. & Farr F. 2003 Using language corpora in language teacher education: Pedagogic, linguistic and cultural insights. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 389– 418.Google Scholar
Ooi V. 1997 Analysing the Singapore ICE corpus for lexicographic evidence. In M. Ljung (Ed.), Corpus-based studies in English (pp. 245– 260). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Paran A., & Watts E. (Eds.) 2003 Storytelling in ELT. Whitstable, UK: International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language (IATEFL).
Payne J. S., & Whitney P. J. 2002 Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20, 7– 32.Google Scholar
Prodromou L. 1997 Global English and its struggle against the octopus. IATEFL Newsletter, 135, 12– 14.Google Scholar
Prodromou L. 2003 In search of the successful user of English. Modern English Teacher, 12, 5– 14.Google Scholar
Rampton B., Roberts C., Leung C., & Harris R. 2002 Methodology in the analysis of classroom discourse. Applied Linguistics, 23, 373– 392.Google Scholar
Riggenbach H. 1999 Discourse analysis in the language classroom, Vol. 1: The spoken language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Robinson P. 2001 Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27– 57.Google Scholar
Samuda V. 2001 Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 119– 140). Harlow, UK: Pearson.
Seidlhofer B. 2001 Closing a conceptual gap: The case for a description of English as a Lingua Franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 133– 158.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer B. (this volume). Research perspectives on teaching English as a lingua franca.
Shumin K. 2002 Factors to consider: Developing adult EFL students' speaking abilities. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practices (pp. 201– 211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simpson J. 2002 Discourse and synchronous computer-mediated communication: Uniting speaking and writing? In K. Spelman Miller & P. Thompson (Eds.), Unity and diversity in language use (pp. 57– 71). London: Continuum.
Simpson R. C., Lucka B., & Ovens J. 2000 Methodological challenges of planning a spoken corpus with pedagogical outcomes. In L. Burnard & T. McEnery (Eds.), Rethinking language pedagogy from a corpus perspective Papers from the Third International Conference on Teaching and Language Corpora (TALC) (pp. 43– 49). Frankfurt: Lang.
Slade D. 1997 Stories and gossip in English: The macro-structure of casual talk. Prospect, 12, 72– 86.Google Scholar
Stern K. 1997 The Longman Spoken American Corpus: Providing an in-depth analysis of everyday English. Longman Language Review, 3, 14– 17.Google Scholar
Swain M. 2000 The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition (pp. 97– 114). New York: Oxford University Press.
Swain M., & Lapkin S. 2000 Task based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4, 253– 276.Google Scholar
Timmis I. 2002 Native-speaker norms and International English: A classroom view. ELT Journal, 56, 240– 249.Google Scholar
van Lier L. 1998 The relationship between consciousness, interaction and language learning. Language Awareness, 7, 128– 145.Google Scholar
Vygotsky L. S. 1978 Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wajnryb R. 2003 Stories: Narrative activities for the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wallwork A. 1997a Discussions A-Z. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wallwork A. 1997b Discussions A-Z advanced teacher's book: A resource book of speaking activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walsh S. 2002 Construction of obstruction: Teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 6, 3– 23.Google Scholar
Warschauer M. 2000 The changing global economy and the future of English teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 511– 535.Google Scholar
Warschauer M., & Whittaker P. F. 2001 The Internet for English language teaching: Guidelines for teachers. J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practices (pp. 368– 373). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wong J. 2000 Delayed next turn repair initiation native/non-native speaker English conversation. Applied Linguistics, 21, 244– 267.Google Scholar
Wray A. 2000 Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice. Applied Linguistics, 21, 463– 489.Google Scholar
Wray A. 2002 Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yuan Y. 2001 An enquiry into empirical pragmatics data-gathering methods: Written DCTs, oral DCTs, field notes, and natural conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 271– 292.Google Scholar
Yuan F., & Ellis R. 2003 The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1– 27.Google Scholar
Zelman N. E., & Moran P. R. 1996 Conversation inspirations (2nd. ed.). Brattleboro, VT: Pro Lingua.