Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:21:08.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language and Gender*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

Alice F. Freed
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the past several years the subfield of sociolinguistics known as language and gender has developed a sophistication that could not have been predicted from the research of the early 1970s. While this area of study has evolved along many of the same lines as other branches of sociolinguistics, the lessons of language and gender research have informed the wider field by producing an awareness of the subtlety of such categories as sex and gender (along with class and ethnicity); it has forced a reevaluation of these categories, once assumed to correlate in a straightforward fashion with language variation.

Type
Applied Linguistics and Related Disciplines
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 15 , March 1995 , pp. 3 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Brown, P. 1990. Gender, politeness and confrontation in Tenejapa. Discourse Processes. 13.123–141. [Reprinted in D. Tannen (ed.) Gender and conversational interaction. New York: Oxford University Press. 1993. 144–162, and in C. Roman, S. Juhasz, and C. Miller (eds.) The women and language debate: A sourcebook. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. 1994. 322–339]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D. 1990. Feminism and linguistic theory, 2nd ed.London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S.. 1992. Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology. 21.461–490. [Reprinted in C. Roman, S. Juhasz, and C. Miller (eds.) The women and language debate: A sourcebook. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. 1994. 432–460.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, S. 1991. Between speech and silence: The problematics of research on language and gender. In Leonardo, M. di (ed.) Gender at the crossroads of knowledge: Feminist anthropology in the postmodern era. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 175–203. [Reprinted in C. Roman, S. Juhasz, and C. Miller (eds.) The women and language debate: A sourcebook. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. 1994. 407–431.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. 1990. He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among Black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Henley, N. and Kramarae, C.. 1991. Gender, power and miscommunication. In Coupland, N., Giles, H. and Wiemann, J. M. (eds.) Miscommunication and problematic talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. 18–43. [Reprinted in C. Roman, S. Juhasz, and C. Miller (eds.) The women and language debate: A sourcebook. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. 1994. 383–406.]Google Scholar
Hall, K., Bucholtz, M. and Moonwomon, B. (eds.) 1992. Locating power: Proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group. [2 Volumes.]Google Scholar
Ochs, E. 1992. Indexing gender. In Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (eds.) Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 335–358.Google Scholar
Penelope, J. 1990. Speaking freely: Unlearning the lies of the fathers' tongues. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. 1990. You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (ed.) 1993. Gender and conversational interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ainsworth-Vaughn, N. 1992. Topic transitions in physicia-patient interviews: Power, gender, and discourse change. Language in Society. 21.409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayim, M. and Goossens, D.. 1993. Issues in gender and language: An annotated bibliography. Resources for feminist research. (Documentation sur la recherche féministe.) 22.1–2.3–35.Google Scholar
Bacon, S. and Finnemann, M.. 1992. Sex-differences in self-reported beliefs about foreign-language learning and authentic oral and written input. Language Learning. 42.471–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergvall, V. L., Bing, J. M. and Freed, A. F. (eds.) Forthcoming. Issues in language and gender: Research and method. London: Longman. [Real Language Series.]Google Scholar
Bischoping, K. 1993. Gender differences in conversational topics: 1922–1992. Sex Roles. 28.1–18.Google Scholar
Borker, R. and Maltz, D.. 1989. Anthropological perspectives on gender and language. In Morgan, S. (ed.) Gender and anthropology: Critical reviews for research and teaching. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association. 411–437.Google Scholar
Brown, P. 1980. How and why are women more polite: Some evidence from a Mayan community. In McConnell-Ginet, S., Borker, R. and Furman, N. (eds.) Women and language in literature and society. New York: Praeger. 111–136.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. et al. (eds.) In press. Communication in, through, and across cultures: Proceedings of the third Berkeley women and language conference. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
Bull, T. and Swan, T. (eds.) 1992. Language, sex, and society. Berlin. Mouton de Gruyter. [International Journal of the Sociology of Language 94.]Google Scholar
Caldos-Coulthard, C. R. 1993. From discourse analysis to critical discourse analysis: The differential representation of women and men speaking in written news. In Sinclair, J., Hoey, M. and Fox, G. (eds.) Techniques of description: Spoken and written discourse. London: Routledge. 196–208.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. In press. The future of feminist linguistics. In Mills, S. (ed.) Language and gender. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 1992. Linguistics correlates of language and sex. English World-Wide. 13.173–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, J. 1982. Variation in an English dialect. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coates, J. 1991. Women's cooperative talk: A new kind of conversational duet? In Uhlig, C. and Zimmerman, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the Anglistentag 1990 Marburg. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 296–311.Google Scholar
Coates, J. 1993. Women, men and language, 2nd ed.London: Longman.Google Scholar
Coates, J. In press. Discourse, gender and subjectivity: The talk of teenage girls. In Bucholtz, M. et al. (eds.) Communication in, through, and across cultures: Proceedings of the third Berkeley women and language conference. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
Coates, J. Forthcoming. Women talking to women. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
DeFrancisco, V. L. 1991. The sounds of silence: How men silence women in marital relations. Discourse and Society. 2.413–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFrancisco, V. L. 1992. Ethnography and gender: Learning to talk like girls and boys. Topics in Language Disorders. 12.3.40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Klerk, V. 1992. How taboo are taboo words for girls? Language in Society. 21.277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, P. 1993. Gender issues in language and writing. Washington, DC: ERIC. [ED 356 486.]Google Scholar
Eckert, P. 1989. The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change. 1.245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, S. and King, R.. 1992. Gender-based language reform and the social construction of meaning. Discourse and Society. 3.151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, S. and King, R.. 1994. Feminist meanings and the (de)politicalization of the lexicon. Language in Society. 23.59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, S. and King, R.. Forthcoming. Consensual sex or sexual harassment: Negotiating meaning. In Bergvall, V. L., Bing, J. M. and Freed, A. F. (eds.) Issues in language and gender: Research and method. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ermann, B. 1992. Female and male usage of pragmatic expressions in same-sex and mixed-sex interaction. In Tottie, G. (ed.) Quantitative discourse analysis. 217–234. [Special issue of Language Variation and Change. 4.2.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freed, A. F. 1992a. A global perspective of language and gender research: A bibliography. Women and Language. 15.1–7.Google Scholar
Freed, A. F. 1992b. We understand perfectly: A critique of Tannen's view of cross-sex conversation. In Hall, K., Bucholtz, M. and Moonwomon, B. (eds.) Locating power: Proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference, Volume 1. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group. 144–152.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. and McElhinny, B.. Forthcoming. Teaching language, challenging gender. In Hornberger, N. and McKay, S. (eds.) Sociolinguistics and language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gal, S. 1978. Peasant men can't get wives: Language change and sex roles in a bilingual community. Language in Society. 7.1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. In press. Stance-taking in Latina girls' hop scotch. In Bucholtz, M. et al. (eds.) Communication in, through, and across cultures: Proceedings of the third Berkeley women and language conference. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
Greenwood, A. In press. Children on trial: Language issues and child testimony. In Bucholtz, M. et al. (eds.) Communication in, through, and across cultures: Proceedings of the third Berkeley women and language conference. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
Greenwood, A. and Freed, A. F.. 1992. Women talking to women: The function of questions in conversations. In Hall, K., Bucholtz, M. and Moonwomon, B. (eds.) Locating power: Proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference, Volume 1. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group. 197–206.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. 1982a. Discourse strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. (ed.) 1982b. Language and social identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, K. and O'Donovan, V.. Forthcoming. Shifting gender positions among Hindi-speaking Hijdas. In Bergvall, V. L., Bing, J. M. and Freed, A. F. (eds.) Language and gender research: Theory and method. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Henley, N. Forthcoming. Ethnicity and gender issues in language. In Landrine, H. (ed.) Handbook of cultural diversity in feminist psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Herring, S. 1993. Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. In Benson, T. (ed.) Electronic journal of communication / Revue electronique de communication. [Special issue of Computer-Mediated Communication. 3.2.]Google Scholar
Holmes, J. 1991. State of the art: Language and gender. Language Teaching. 24.207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. 1992. Women's talk in public places. Discourse and Society. 3.131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. 1993a. Immigrant women and language maintenance in Australia and New Zealand. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 3.159–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. 1993b. New Zealand women are good to talk to: An analysis of politeness strategies in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics. 20.91–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. 1993c. The role of women in language maintenance and shift. Working Papers on Language Gender and Sexism. 3.5–24.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. 1993d. Women's talk: The question of sociolinguistic universals. Australian Journal of Communication. 20.125–149.Google Scholar
Houston, M. and Kramarae, C. (eds.) 1991. Women speaking from silence. [Special issue of Discourse and Society. 2.4.]Google Scholar
Hughs, S. E. 1992. Expletives of lower working-class women. Language in Society. 21.291–303.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1974. Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
James, D. Forthcoming. When and why do women use more prestige speech forms than men? A critical review. In Bergvall, V. L., Bing, J. M. and Freed, A. F. (eds.) Language and gender research: Theory and method. London: Longman.Google Scholar
James, D. and Clarke, S.. 1993. Women, men and interruptions: A critical review. In Tannen, D. (ed.) Gender and conversational interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 231–280.Google Scholar
James, D. and Drakich, J.. 1993. Understanding gender differences in amount of talk: A critical review of research. In Tannen, D. (ed.) Gender and conversational interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 281–312.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. M. and Roen, D. H.. 1992. Complimenting and involvement in peer reviews: Gender variation. Language in Society. 21.27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, B. 1993. Community and contest: Midwestern men and women creating their worlds in conversational storytelling. In Tannen, D. (ed.) Gender and conversational interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 62–82.Google Scholar
Kramarae, C. 1990. Changing the complexion of gender in language research. In Giles, H. and Robinson, W. P. (eds.) Handbook of language and social psychology. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons. 345–361.Google Scholar
Kramarae, C. 1992. Punctuating the dictionary. International Journal of Society and Language. 94.135–154.Google Scholar
Kramarae, C. and Taylor, H. J.. 1993. Women and men on electronic networks: A conversation or a monologue? In Taylor, H. J., Kramarae, C., and Ebben, M. (eds.) Women, information technology, and scholarship. Urbana, IL: Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois. 52–61.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. and von Hoene, L.. In press. The dialogic emergence of difference: Feminist explorations in foreign language learning and teaching. In Stanton, D. and Stewart, A. (eds.) Rethinking the disciplines: Feminism in the academy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kulich, D. 1992. Anger, gender, language shift and the politics of revelation in a Papua New Guinean village. Pragmatics. 2.281–296.Google Scholar
Kulich, D. 1993. Speaking as a woman: Structure and gender in domestic arguments in a New Guinea village. Cultural Anthropology. 8.510–541.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1990. The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change. 2.205–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafrance, M. and Hahn, E.. 1994. The disappearing agent: Gender stereotypes, interpersonal verbs, and implicit causality. In Roman, C., Juhasz, S. and Miller, C. (eds.) The woman and language debate: A sourcebook. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. 348–362.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. 1973. Language and woman's place. Language in Society. 2.45–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, R. 1975. Language and women's place. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Lewkowicz, L. 1993. Deaf children's sex-role stereotypes as a function of language ability. Washington, DC: ERIC. [ED 359 576.]Google Scholar
Maltz, D. and Borker, R.. 1982. A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In Gumperz, J. (ed.) Language and social identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 196–216.Google Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, S. 1988. Language and gender. In Newmeyer, F. (ed.) Linguistics: The Cambridge survey, Volume IV: The sociocultural context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElhinny, B. 1993. We all wear the blue: Language, gender and police work. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Ph.D. diss.Google Scholar
McElhinny, B. 1994. An economy of affect: Objectivity, masculinity and the gendering of police work. In Cornwall, A. and Lindisfarne, N. (eds.) Dislocating masculinities: Comparative ethnographies. London: Routledge. 159–171.Google Scholar
McLemore, C. 1991. The interpretation of L*H in English. Linguistic Forum. 32.175–196. [Austin, TX: University of Texas Department of Linguistics and Center for Cognitive Science.]Google Scholar
Milroy, J. and Milroy, L.. 1993. Mechanisms of change in urban dialects: The role of class, social network and gender. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 3.57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, L. 1980. Language and social networks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, L. 1992. New perspectives in the analysis of sex differentiation in language. In Bolton, K. and Kwok, H. (eds.) Sociolinguistics today: International perspectives. London: Routledge. 163–179.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. 1991. Indirectness and interpretation in African American women's discourse. Pragmatics 1.421–452.Google Scholar
Murray, S. O. 1994. Sex and the economy of speaking turns. Journal of Pragmatics. 21.215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, P. 1983. Linguistic options and choices for Black women in the rural south. In Thorne, B., Kramarae, C. and Henley, N. (eds.) Language, gender and society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 54–68.Google Scholar
Oxford, R. 1993. Instructional implications of gender differences in second/foreign language (L2) learning styles and strategies. Applied Language Learning. 4.65–94.Google Scholar
Pearson, B. and Lee, K. S.. 1992. Discourse structure of direction giving: Effects of native/nonnative speaker status and gender. TESOL Quarterly. 26.113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penfield, J. (ed.) 1987. Women and language in transition. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Perry, L. A., Turner, L. H. and Sterk, H. M. (eds.) 1992. Constructing and reconstructing gender: The links among communication, language, and gender. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Philips, S. U., Steele, S. and Tanz, C. (eds.) 1987. Language, gender and sex in comparative perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, L. Forthcoming. Language learning and living abroad: Stories from the field. In Freed, B. F. (ed.) Second language acquisition in a study abroad context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Studies in Bilingualism.]Google Scholar
Roman, C., Juhasz, S. and Miller, C. (eds.) 1994. The women and language debate: A sourcebook. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. and Greene, K.. 1992. Gender-typical style in written language. Research in the Teaching of English. 26.7–40.Google Scholar
Sheldon, A. 1990. Pickle fights: Gendered talk in preschool disputes. Discourse Processes. 13.5–31. [Reprinted in D. Tannen (ed.) Gender and conversational interaction. New York: Oxford University Press. 1993. 83–109.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, A. 1992. Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic challenges to self–assertion and how young girls meet them. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 38.95–117.Google Scholar
Smith, J. 1992. Women in charge: Politeness and directives in the speech of Japanese women. Language in Society. 21.59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swann, J. 1992. Girls, boys and language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Swann, J. 1993. What do we do about gender? In Beveridge, M. and Reddiford, G. (eds.) Language, culture and education. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. 164–173.Google Scholar
Talbot, M. 1992. I wish you'd stop interrupting me! Journal of Pragmatics. 18.441–466.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. 1992a. Response to S. Troemel–Ploetz's ”Selling the apolitical.” Discourse and Society. 3.249–254.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. 1992b. Rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance. In Kramsch, C. & McConnell-Ginet, S. (eds.) Text and context: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on language study. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath. 135–147.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. 1994. Gender and discourse. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. J., Kramarae, C., and Ebben, M. (eds.) 1993. Women, information technology, and scholarship. Urbana, IL: Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Thorne, B. and Henley, N. (eds.) 1975. Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Thorne, B., Kramarae, C. and Henley, N. (eds.) 1983. Language, gender and society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Troemel-Ploetz, S. 1991. Review essay: Selling the apolitical. Discourse and Society. 2.489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troemel-Ploetz, S. 1994. “Let me put it this way, John”: Conversational strategies of women in leadership positions. Journal of Pragmatics. 22.2.199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, P. 1972. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society. 1.179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchida, A. 1992. When “difference” is “dominance”: A critique of the “anti-power-based” cultural approach to sex differences. Language in Society. 21.547–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, C. 1992. Rethinking “sex differences” in conversational topics. Advances in Group Processes. 9.131–162.Google Scholar
Yepez, M. 1994. An observation of gender specific teacher behavior in the ESL classroom. Sex Roles. 30.121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuber, S. and Reed, A. M.. 1993. The politics of grammar handbooks: Generic he and singular they. College English. 55.515–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar