Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T10:56:28.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gut contents and stable isotope analyses of the Antarctic fish, Notothenia coriiceps (Richardson), from two macroalgal communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2010

Jill P. Zamzow ,
Craig F. Aumack ,
Charles D. Amsler ,
James B. McClintock ,
Margaret O. Amsler  and
Bill J. Baker
Jill P. Zamzow*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1300 University Boulevard, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
Craig F. Aumack
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1300 University Boulevard, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
Charles D. Amsler
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1300 University Boulevard, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
James B. McClintock
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1300 University Boulevard, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
Margaret O. Amsler
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1300 University Boulevard, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
Bill J. Baker
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, CHE 205A, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
*
jzamzow@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gut contents studies have shown that Notothenia coriiceps, a prevalent shallow water fish species along the western Antarctic Peninsula, has a highly variable diet. This variability, coupled with small home ranges, suggest that microhabitat may play a role in determining the chief prey items of N. coriiceps. We trapped fish from three sites comprised of two different algal microhabitats around Palmer Station, Antarctica and investigated their diets via gut contents and stable isotope analyses. Gut contents analysis revealed that amphipods were the primary prey item at all three sites, but the distribution of amphipod species eaten varied between sites. Other important prey classes were snails, limpets, algae and fish. Overall, the gut content data suggested that algal microhabitat was less important than geographic location in determining diet. On the other hand, stable isotope analysis indicated that fish from the Palmaria decipiens site were more enriched in both carbon and nitrogen than fish from Desmarestia menziesii sites. Hence, it would appear that in the longer term, algal microhabitat may influence fish diets and trophic relationships.

Keywords

amphipodsAntarcticaDesmarestia menziesiifood web analysisPalmaria decipiens
Type
Biological Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 107 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amsler, C.D., McClintock, J.B. Baker, B.J. 2008. Macroalgal chemical defenses in polar marine communities. In Amsler, C.D., ed. Algal chemical ecology. Berlin: Springer, 91–103.Google Scholar
Amsler, C.D., Amsler, M.O., McClintock, J.B. Baker, B.J. 2009. Filamentous algal endophytes in macrophytic Antarctic algae: prevalence in hosts and palatability to mesoherbivores. Phycologia, 48, 324–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amsler, C.D., Rowley, R.J., Laur, D.R., Quetin, L.B. Ross, R.M. 1995. Vertical distribution of Antarctic Peninsula macroalgae: cover, biomass, and species composition. Phycologia, 34, 424–430.Google Scholar
Amsler, C.D., Iken, K., McClintock, J.B., Amsler, M.O., Peters, K.J., Hubbard, J.M., Furrow, F.B. Baker, B.J. 2005. Comprehensive evaluation of the palatability and chemical defenses of subtidal macroalgae from the Antarctic Peninsula. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 294, 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumack, C.F., Amsler, C.D., McClintock, J.B. Baker, B.J. 2010. Chemically mediated resistance to mesoherbivory in finely branched macroalgae along the western Antarctic Peninsula. European Journal of Phycology, 45, 19–26.Google Scholar
Barrera-Oro, E.R. Casaux, R.J. 1990. Feeding selectivity in Notothenia neglecta, Nybelin, from Potter Cove, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 2, 207–213.Google Scholar
Bellan-Santini, D. 1972. Amphipodes provenant des contenus stomacaux de trois espèces de poissons nototheniidae récoltés en Terre Adélie (Antarctique). Tethys, 4, 683–702.Google Scholar
Benavides, A.G., Cancino, J.M. Ojeda, F.P. 1994. Ontogenetic changes in gut dimensions and macroalgal digestibility in the marine herbivorous fish, Aplodactylus punctatus. Functional Ecology, 8, 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blankley, W.O. 1982. Feeding ecology of three inshore fish species at Marion Island (Southern Ocean). South African Journal of Zoology, 17, 164–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bone, D.G. 1972. Aspects of the biology of the Antarctic amphipod Bovallia gigantea Pfeffer at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, No. 27, 105–122.Google Scholar
Brouwer, P.E.M., Geilen, E.F.M., Gremmen, N.J.M. van Lent, F. 1995. Biomass, cover and zonation pattern of sublittoral macroalgae at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands, Antarctica. Botanica Marina, 38, 259–270.Google Scholar
Burchett, M.S., Sayers, P.J., North, A.W. White, M.G. 1983. Some biological aspects of the nearshore fish populations at South Georgia. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, No. 59, 63–74.Google Scholar
Campbell, H.A., Fraser, K.P.P., Bishop, C.M., Peck, L.S. Egginton, S. 2008. Hibernation in an Antarctic fish: on ice for winter. PLoS ONE, 3, e1743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casaux, R.J., Mazzotta, A.S. Barrera-Oro, E.R. 1990. Seasonal aspects of the biology and diet of nearshore nototheniid fish at Potter Cove, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Polar Biology, 11, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, R.A. 1982. Feeding ecology of some fishes of the Antarctic peninsula. Fishery Bulletin, 80, 575–588.Google Scholar
Dunton, K.H. 2001. δ15N and δ13C measurements of Antarctic Peninsula fauna: trophic relationships and assimilation of benthic seaweeds. American Zoologist, 41, 99–112.Google Scholar
Gon, O. Heemstra, P.C., eds. 1990. Fishes of the Southern Ocean. Grahamstown: JLB Smith Institute of Ichthyology, 462 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesslein, R.H., Hallard, K.A. Ramal, P. 1993. Replacement of sulphur, carbon and nitrogen of growing broad whitefish (Coregonus nasus) in response to a change in diet traced by δ13C, δ15N and δ34S. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 50, 2071–2076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y.M., Amsler, M.O., McClintock, J.B., Amsler, C.D. Baker, B.J. 2007. Patterns of gammaridean amphipod abundance and species composition associated with dominant subtidal macroalgae from the western Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Biology, 30, 1417–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y.M., McClintock, J.B., Amsler, C.D., Peters, K.J. Baker, B.J. 2006. Feeding rates of common Antarctic gammarid amphipods on ecologically important sympatric macroalgae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 329, 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hureau, J.-C. 1970. Biologie comparee des quelques poissons antarctiques (Nototheniidae). Bulletin de l’Institut Oceanographique de Monaco, 68, 1–244.Google Scholar
Iken, K., Quartino, M.L. Wiencke, C. 1999. Histological identification of macroalgae from stomach contents of the Antarctic fish Notothenia coriiceps using semi-thin sections. Marine Ecology, 20, 11–17.Google Scholar
Iken, K., Barrera-Oro, E.R., Quartino, M.L., Casaux, R.J. Brey, T. 1997. Grazing by the Antarctic fish Notothenia coriiceps: evidence for selective feeding on macroalgae. Antarctic Science, 9, 386–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, H., Pierce, C.L. Larscheid, J.G. 2001. Empirical assessment of indices of prey importance in the diets of predacious fish. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 130, 583–591.Google Scholar
Linkowski, T.B., Presler, P. Zukowski, C. 1983. Food habits of nototheniid fishes (Nototheniidae) in Admiralty Bay (King George Island, South Shetland Islands). Polish Polar Research, 4, 79–95.Google Scholar
Moreno, C.A. Zamorano, J.H. 1980. Selección de los alimentos en Notothenia coriiceps neglecta del cinturón de macroalgas de Bahía South Antarctica. Serie Cientifica del Instituto Antártico Chileno, 25/26, 33–43.Google Scholar
Pinkas, L., Oliphant, M.S. Iverson, I.L.K. 1971. Food habits study. Fish Bulletin, 152, 5–10.Google Scholar
Quartino, M.L., Klöser, H., Schloss, I.R. Wiencke, C. 2001. Biomass and associations of benthic marine macroalgae from the inner Potter Cove (King George Island, Antarctica) related to depth and substrate. Polar Biology, 24, 349–355.Google Scholar
Richardson, M.G. 1975. The dietary composition of some Antarctic fish. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, No. 41, 113–120.Google Scholar
Ricker, W.E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 191, 1–382.Google Scholar
Taylor, R.B. 1998. Short-term dynamics of a seaweed epifaunal assemblage. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 227, 67–82.Google Scholar
Zamzow, J.P., Amsler, C.D., McClintock, J.B. Baker, B.J. 2010. Habitat choice and predator avoidance by Antarctic amphipods: the roles of algal chemistry and morphology. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 400, 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar