Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T20:03:44.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Short Note: Can dead sponges still talk?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2007

Jan Seiler  and
Julian Gutt
Jan Seiler*
Affiliation:
School of Ocean Sciences, University of Wales, Menai BridgeLL59 5AB, UK
Julian Gutt
Affiliation:
Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Columbusstrasse, 27568 Bremerhaven, Germany
*
osu024@bangor.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Life Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 337 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arntz, W.E. & Brey, T. 2005. The Expedition ANTARKTIS XXI/2 (BENDEX) of RV “Polarstern” in 2003/2004. Berichte zur Polar- und Meeresforschung, 503, 121–142.Google Scholar
Barnes, D.K.A. & Conlan, K. 2007. Disturbance, colonization and development of Antarctic benthic communities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B362, 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, A. & Johnston, N.M. 2003. Antarctic marine benthic diversity. Oceanography & Marine Biology, 41, 47–114.Google Scholar
Dayton, P.K. 1989. Interdecadal variation in an Antarctic sponge and its predators from oceanographic climate shifts. Science, 245, 1484–1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosfeld, K., Hinze, H., Ritter, B., Schenke, H.-W., Sievers, J. & Thyssen, F. 1989. Karten zur Schelfeisdynamik 1:500 000, Topografische Karte und Satellitenkarte, Ekströmisen, SR 29-30/SW. Frankfurt am Main: Institut für Angewandt Geodäsie.Google Scholar
Gutt, J. 2007. Antarctic macro-zoobenthic communities: a review and an ecological classification. Antarctic Science, 19, 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutt, J. & Piepenburg, D. 2003. Scale-dependent impact on diversity of Antarctic benthos caused by grounding of icebergs. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 253, 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hambrey, M.J., Ehrmann, W.U. & Larsen, B. 1991. Cenozoic glacial record of the Prydz Bay continental shelf, East Antarctica. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, 119, 77–132.Google Scholar
McClintock, J.B., Amsler, M.O., Amsler, C.D., Southworth, K.J., Petrie, C. & Baker, B.J. 2004. Biochemical composition, energy content and chemical antifeedant and antifoulant defenses of the colonial Antarctic ascidian Distaplia cylindrica. Marine Biology, 145, 885–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearse, J.S., McClintock, J.B. & Bosch, I. 1991. Reproduction of Antarctic benthic marine invertebrates: tempos, modes, and timing. American Zoologist, 31, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thatje, S., Hillenbrand, C.D. & Larter, R. 2005. On the origin of Antarctic marine benthic community structure. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 534–540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed