Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:33:13.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of marine vertebrates on Antarctic terrestrial micro-arthropods

Part of: Antarctic Science International Bursary collection: Biosciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

Stef Bokhorst  and
Peter Convey
Stef Bokhorst*
Affiliation:
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) Department of Arctic Ecology, Tromsø NO 9296, Norway Department of Systems Ecology, Institute of Ecological Science, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, NL 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Peter Convey
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK National Antarctic Research Centre, University Malaya, B303, Level 3, Block B, Lembah Pantai, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
*
stefbokhorst@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Traits of primary producers associated with tissue quality are commonly assumed to have strong control over higher trophic levels. However, this view is largely based on studies of vascular plants, and cryptogamic vegetation has received far less attention. In this study natural gradients in nutrient concentrations in cryptogams associated with the proximity of penguin colonies on a Maritime Antarctic island were utilized to quantify the impact of nitrogen content on micro-arthropod communities. Proximity to penguin colonies increased the nitrogen concentration of cryptogams, and the penguin source was confirmed by decreasing δ15N values at greater distances from colonies. Micro-arthropod abundance, diversity (H’) and richness declined with distance from the penguin colonies, and was positively correlated with the nitrogen concentrations of cryptogams. Δ15N of micro-arthropods was positively correlated (r2=0.865, P<0.01) with δ15N of the moss Andreaea depressinervis indicating that penguin-derived nitrogen moves through Antarctic food webs across multiple trophic levels. Nitrogen content of cryptogams was correlated with associated micro-arthropods indicating that biotic interactions affect community development in Antarctic terrestrial ecosystems. The spatial patterns of Antarctic biodiversity can therefore be affected by local factors, such as marine vertebrates, beyond existing latitudinal patterns of temperature and water availability.

Keywords

AcariCollembolaisotopelichenmossnitrogen
Type
Biological Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , June 2016 , pp. 175 - 186
Check for updates
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, A.A. & Fishbein, M. 2006. Plant defense syndromes. Ecology, 87, 132–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, S.E., Grimshaw, H.M. & Holdgate, M.W. 1967. Factors affecting the availability of plant nutrients on an Antarctic island. Journal of Ecology, 55, 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, W.B. & Polis, G.A. 1999. Nutrient fluxes from water to land: seabirds affect plant nutrient status on Gulf of California islands. Oecologia, 118, 324–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asplund, J. & Wardle, D.A. 2013. The impact of secondary compounds and functional characteristics on lichen palatability and decomposition. Journal of Ecology, 101, 689–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, W. & Harrisson, P.M. 1995. Collembolan water relations and environmental-change in the Maritime Antarctic. Global Change Biology, 1, 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bokhorst, S., Asplund, J., Kardol, P. & Wardle, D.A. 2015. Lichen physiological traits and growth forms affect communities of associated invertebrates. Ecology, 96, 2394–2407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bokhorst, S., Huiskes, A., Convey, P. & Aerts, R. 2007a. Climate change effects on organic matter decomposition rates in ecosystems from the Maritime Antarctic and Falkland Islands. Global Change Biology, 13, 2642–2653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bokhorst, S., Wardle, D.A., Nilsson, M.-C. & Gundale, M.J. 2014. Impact of understory mosses and dwarf shrubs on soil micro-arthropods in a boreal forest chronosequence. Plant and Soil, 379, 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bokhorst, S., Ronfort, C., Huiskes, A., Convey, P. & Aerts, R. 2007b. Food choice of Antarctic soil arthropods clarified by stable isotope signatures. Polar Biology, 30, 983–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bokhorst, S., Huiskes, A., Convey, P., Sinclair, B.J., Lebouvier, M., van de Vijver, B. & Wall, D.H. 2011. Microclimate impacts of passive warming methods in Antarctica: implications for climate change studies. Polar Biology, 34, 1421–1435.Google Scholar
Caruso, T., Trokhymets, V., Bargagli, R. & Convey, P. 2013. Biotic interactions as a structuring force in soil communities: evidence from the micro-arthropods of an Antarctic moss model system. Oecologia, 172, 495–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Convey, P. 1996. The influence of environmental characteristics on life history attributes of Antarctic terrestrial biota. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 71, 191–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Convey, P. 2013. Antarctic ecosystems. In Levin, S.A., ed. Encyclopedia of biodiversity, Vol 1. Waltham: Elsevier, 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Convey, P., Block, W. & Peat, H.J. 2003. Soil arthropods as indicators of water stress in Antarctic terrestrial habitats? Global Change Biology, 9, 1718–1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Convey, P., Chown, S.L., Clarke, A., Barnes, D.K.A., Bokhorst, S., Cummings, V., Ducklow, H.W., Frati, F., Green, T.G.A., Gordon, S., Griffiths, H.J., Howard-Williams, C., Huiskes, A.H.L., Laybourn-Parry, J., Lyons, W.B., McMinn, A., Morley, S.A., Peck, L.S., Quesada, A., Robinson, S.A., Schiaparelli, S. & Wall, D.H. 2014. The spatial structure of Antarctic biodiversity. Ecological Monographs, 84, 203–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crittenden, P.D., Scrimgeour, C.M., Minnullina, G., Sutton, M.A., Tang, Y.S. & Theobald, M.R. 2015. Lichen response to ammonia deposition defines the footprint of a penguin rookery. Biogeochemistry, 122, 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, M.C. & Rothery, P. 1992. Factors causing the limitation of growth of terrestrial algae in Maritime Antarctica during late summer. Polar Biology, 12, 595–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, R.C. 1981. Structure and function of 2 Antarctic terrestrial moss communities. Ecological Monographs, 51, 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, J.C. 2005. Marine birds on land: a review of plant biomass, species richness, and community composition in seabird colonies. Plant Ecology, 181, 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskine, P.D., Bergstrom, D.M., Schmidt, S., Stewart, G.R., Tweedie, C.E. & Shaw, J.D. 1998. Subantarctic Macquarie Island – a model ecosystem for studying animal-derived nitrogen sources using N-15 natural abundance. Oecologia, 117, 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauslaa, Y. 2005. Lichen palatability depends on investments in herbivore defence. Oecologia, 143, 94–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goddard, D.G. 1982. Feeding biology of free-living acari at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands, Antarctica. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, no. 52, 290–293.Google Scholar
Grime, J.P. 2001. Plant strategies, vegetation processes and ecosystem properties. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 456 pp.Google Scholar
Grime, J.P., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Thompson, K. & Hodgson, J.G. 1996. Evidence of a causal connection between anti-herbivore defence and the decomposition rate of leaves. Oikos, 77, 489–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, I.D., Craig, S.C., Convey, P., Newsham, K.K., O’Donnell, A.G., Adams, B.J., Aislabie, J., Frati, F., Stevens, M.I. & Wall, D.H. 2006. Biotic interactions in Antarctic terrestrial ecosystems: are they a factor? Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38, 3035–3040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, A.D. 1993. Water as a limiting factor in the Antarctic terrestrial environment – a biogeographical synthesis. Arctic and Alpine Research, 25, 308–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindeboom, H.J. 1984. The nitrogen pathway in a penguin rookery. Ecology, 65, 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loranger, J., Meyer, S.T., Shipley, B., Kattge, J., Loranger, H., Roscher, C. & Weisser, W.W. 2012. Predicting invertebrate herbivory from plant traits: evidence from 51 grassland species in experimental monocultures. Ecology, 93, 2674–2682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattson, W.J. Jr 1980. Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11, 119–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, B.J. & Fry, B. 1987. Stable isotopes in ecosystem studies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18, 293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royles, J., Amesbury, M.J., Convey, P., Griffiths, H., Hodgson, D.A., Leng, M.J. & Charman, D.J. 2013. Plants and soil microbes respond to recent warming on the Antarctic Peninsula. Current Biology, 23, 1702–1706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmane, I. & Brumelis, G. 2008. The importance of the moss layer in sustaining biological diversity of Gamasina mites in coniferous forest soil. Pedobiologia, 52, 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez-Pinero, F. & Polis, G.A. 2000. Bottom-up dynamics of allochthonous input: direct and indirect effects of seabirds on islands. Ecology, 81, 3117–3132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, K., Migge, S., Norton, R.A., Scheu, S., Langel, R., Reineking, A. & Maraun, M. 2004. Trophic niche differentiation in soil microarthropods (Oribatida, acari): evidence from stable isotope ratios (N-15/N-14). Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 36, 1769–1774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R.I.L. 1988. Destruction of Antarctic terrestrial ecosystems by a rapidly increasing fur-seal population. Biological Conservation, 45, 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usher, M.B. & Booth, R.G. 1984. Arthropod communities in a Maritime Antarctic moss-turf habitat – 3-dimensional distribution of mites and Collembola. Journal of Animal Ecology, 53, 427–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, D.W.H. 1982. The Signy Island terrestrial reference sites: XV. Micro-climate monitoring, 1972–74. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin, no. 55, 111–126.Google Scholar
Wasley, J., Robinson, S.A., Lovelock, C.E. & Popp, M. 2006. Climate change manipulations show Antarctic flora is more strongly affected by elevated nutrients than water. Global Change Biology, 12, 1800–1812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worland, M.R. & Lukešová, A. 2000. The effect of feeding on specific soil algae on the cold-hardiness of two Antarctic micro-arthropods (Alaskozetes antarcticus and Cryptopygus antarcticus). Polar Biology, 23, 766–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zmudczyńska, K., Olejniczak, I., Zwolicki, A., Iliszko, L., Convey, P. & Stempniewicz, L. 2012. Influence of allochtonous nutrients delivered by colonial seabirds on soil collembolan communities on Spitsbergen. Polar Biology, 35, 1233–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Bokhorst and Convey supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Bokhorst and Convey supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 129.6 KB