Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T09:23:02.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Short Note: The application and benefits of digital geological mapping in Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2011

Michael L. Curtis ,
Teal R. Riley ,
Michael J. Flowerdew  and
Alex Tate
Michael L. Curtis*
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
Teal R. Riley
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
Michael J. Flowerdew
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
Alex Tate
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
*
m.curtis@bas.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Earth Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , 12 July 2011 , pp. 387 - 388
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Athey, J.E., Freeman, L.K.Woods, K.A. 2008. The transition from traditional to digital mapping: maintaining data quality while increasing geologic mapping efficiency in Alaska. Alaska Geosurvey News, 11, 2–8.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, A., Holdsworth, R.E., McCaffrey, K.J.W.Wilson, R.W. 2010. Recording and analysing geospatially accurate structural data through ‘Digital Mapping’ technique: a case study from the Canisp Shear Zone, NW Scotland. Journal of Geological Society of India, 75, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, P., Bruciatelli, L., Domingos, F., Jones, R.R., de Donatis, M.Wilson, R.W. 2006. Digital geological mapping with tablet PC and PDA: a comparison. Computers & Geosciences, 32, 1682–1698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, M.L., Flowerdew, M.J., Riley, T.R., Whitehouse, M.J.Daly, S. 2010. Andean sinsitral transpression and kinematic partitioning in South Georgia. Journal of Structural Geology, 32, 464–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlatter, D., Bo, U.L., Stensgaard, M.Buller, G. 2010. Digital field data capture: the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland experiences in Greenland. Explore, 147, 2–14.Google Scholar