Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T15:29:28.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acceptance of the Title Pater Patriae in 2 BC*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2015

Tom Stevenson
Tom Stevenson*
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland, t.stevenson@uq.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Some recent treatments of the Augustan Principate have discussed the title Pater Patriae (= PP) as the expression of a relatively detached and uncontroversial idea. In earlier papers on the significance of this title, however, I have tried to describe its political volatility for both Cicero and Caesar. Cicero's title was applied to him in the wake of his execution of the Catilinarian conspirators; it was meant to characterise him as Rome's saviour, rather than as a murderous tyrant and oppressor. Caesar's title was equally a counter to accusations of murderous tyranny; he did not take Roman lives through civil war, he saved them through the exercise of dementia. Caesar's honour, furthermore, was clearly decreed to him in the form Parens Patriae – parens being a widely used, positive term for a benefactor; Cicero is referred to as both pater and parens in the fractious discourse which followed his consulship. Given the ever-present dichotomy between the father and the tyrant, and the general environment of élite competition, it appears that the form of Caesar's honour implies a deliberate contrast with the claims of Cicero, viz. Caesar's paternal role was certainly about giving or enhancing life, rather than taking it.

Type
Research Article
Information
Antichthon , Volume 43 , 2009 , pp. 97 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © Australasian Society for Classical Studies 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

For Charles, who is greatly missed.

References

Alföldi, A. (1971), Der Vater des Vaterlandes im römischen Denken (Darmstadt).Google Scholar
Beard, M. (1990), ‘Priesthood in the Roman Republic’, in Beard, M. and North, J. (eds), Pagan Priests (London) 34–48.Google Scholar
Beard, M., North, J. and Price, S. (eds) (1998), Religions of Rome, 2 vols (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Bréguet, E. (1980), Cicerón: la république, 2 vols (Paris).Google Scholar
Burkert, W.L. (1972), Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism (trans. Minar, E.L.) (Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Buxton, B.A. (2003), ‘Rome at the Crossroads’, PhD diss., University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Buxton, B.A. and Hannah, R. (2005), ‘OGIS 458, the Augustan Calendar, and the Succession’, Latomus 287, 290–306.Google Scholar
Champlin, E. (2003), Nero (Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Dubourdieu, A. (1989), Les origines et le développement du culte des Pénates à Rome (Rome).Google Scholar
Gordon, R. (1990), ‘The Veil of Power: Emperors, Sacrificers and Benefactors’, in Beard, M. and North, J. (eds), Pagan Priests (London) 199–231.Google Scholar
Gruen, E.S. (2005), ‘Augustus and the Making of the Principate’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus (Cambridge) 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, E.A. (2008 reprint), ‘Caesar's Son and Heir’, in Harrison, J.R. (ed.), The First Christians in the Roman World: Augustan and New Testament Essays (Tübingen, orig. 1977).Google Scholar
Kleiner, D.E.E. and Buxton, B.A. (2008), ‘The Ara Pacis and the Donations of Rome’, AJA 112, 57–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Severy, B. (2003), Augustus and the Family at the Birth of the Roman Empire (New York / London).Google Scholar
Stevenson, T. (1992), ‘The Ideal Benefactor and the Father Analogy in Greek and Roman Thought’, CQ 42, 421–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, T. (1998), ‘The “Divinity” of Caesar and the Title Parens Patriae1’, in Hillard, T.W., Kearsley, R.A., Nixon, C.E.V. and Nobbs, A.M. (eds), Ancient History in a Modern University: Proceedings in Honour of Professor E.A. Judge, vol. 1: The Ancient Near East, Greece, and Rome (Grand Rapids MI / Cambridge UK) 257–68.Google Scholar
Stevenson, T. (2007), ‘Roman Coins and Refusals of the Title Pater Patriae’, Num. Chron. 167, 119–41.Google Scholar
Strothmann, M. (2000), Augustus - Vater der res publica (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1982), ‘Civilis Princeps: Between Citizen and King’, JRS 72, 32–48.Google Scholar
Weigel, R.D. (1992), Lepidus the Tarnished Triumvir (London / New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstock, S. (1971), Divus Julius (Oxford).Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1968), Forum Augustum: Das Bildprogramm (Tübingen).Google Scholar
Zetzel, J.E.G. (1995), Cicero: De Re Publica (Cambridge).Google Scholar