Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:07:31.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Canterbury Try and Mitre Square: an Appreciation of its Proportions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2011

Frank Ball  and
Nancy Ball
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
The Antiquaries Journal , Volume 68 , Issue 2 , September 1988 , pp. 294 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

22 We are extremely grateful to the following for commenting upon the initial draft of this paper: Philip Crummy, Professor O. A. W. Dilke, T. W. T. Tatton-Brown, Professor J. Wacher and Dr G. Webster, O. B. E. Special thanks are due to T. W. T. Tatton-Brown, who made available a full-size drawing of the Canterbury square, and Professor J. Wacher who gave permission to use drawings from The Towns of Roman Britain.

23 Walthew, C. V., ‘Property boundaries and the sizes of building plots in Roman towns’, Britannia, ix (1978), 335–50;CrossRefGoogle Scholarid., ‘Possible standard units of measurement in Roman military planning’, Britannia, xii (1981), 15-35; Jones, R. P., ‘Length-units in Roman town planning; the pes monetalis and the pes Drusianus’, Britannia, xi (1980), 127–33;CrossRefGoogle Scholar, P-Crummy, ‘The origins of some major Romano-British towns’, Britannia, xiii (1982), 125–34;Google ScholarBridges, C. J., ‘The pes monetalis and the pes Drusianus in Xanten’, Britannia, xv (1984), 85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Chapman, H., Antiq.J. lix (1979), 403–7, fig. 3.Google Scholar

25 Plato, , Timaeus, xxii (Harmondsworth, 1981 edn., 73–6).Google Scholar

26 Vitruvius, , The Ten Books on Architecture, iii. 1 (Dover, 1960 edn., 72–5).Google Scholar

27 Dilke, O. A. W., Mathematics and Measurement (London, 1987), 34.Google Scholar

28 Ferguson, J., The Parthenon (John Murray, 1883)Google Scholar; Hambidge, J., The Parthenon (Yale University Press, 1924)Google Scholar; Doczi, G., The Power of Limits (Shambhala, Colorado, 1981)Google Scholar.

29 Dilke, O. A. W., ‘Ground survey and measurement in Roman Towns’ in Grew, F. and Hobley, B. (eds.), Roman Urban Topography in Britain and the Western Empire, Counc. Brit. Arch. Res. Rep. 59 (London, 1985), 9.Google Scholar

30 Dinsmoor, W. B., The Architecture of Ancient Greece (2nd rev. edn., London 1927), 71Google Scholar and pl. xvi; Hambidge, J., The Elements of Dynamic Symmetry (Dover, 1967).Google Scholar

31 Wacher, J., The Towns of Roman Britain (Book Club Associates, 1976), 294.Google Scholar

32 Ibid., 42, 44, 46; Crummy, P., ‘Colchester: the mechanics of laying out a town’, in Grew, and Hobley, (eds.), op. cit. (note 29), 78–85Google Scholar.