^{page 279 note 5} Of the remaining hoards six are described by Mr.Smith, Reginald in Archaeologia, lxxi, 1921, pp. 113CrossRefGoogle Scholar sqq. The others are published in Antiq. J. ix, 42, 152 (Clayton Hill) and Antiq. J. xi, 57 (Canewdon, Essex). The additional hoard from Wells, Norfolk, referred to by Kendrick and Hawkes, Archaeology in England and Wales, p. 72, is in fact one of those described by Mr. Smith, op. cit., but there referred to as the Holkham hoard.

^{page 279 note 6} Armstrong, E. C. R., Proc. Roy. Irish. Acad. xxxiv, 1917–19, C, no. 6Google Scholar.

^{page 282 note 1} The one exhibited in 1853 to the Archaeological Institute at Chichester (Sussex Arch. Coll. viii, 285) was presumably selected as typical.

^{page 282 note 2} One is figured in The Sturge Collection of Flints, i, 328 (R. A. Smith).

^{page 282 note 3} Curwen, Sussex (County Archaeologies), pp. 131, fig. 4; 133, fig. 2; 134, fig. 3; 140, fig. 3.

^{page 282 note 4} J. H. Pull, Flint-miners of Blackpatch, pl. xxi, right.

^{page 282 note 5} Op. cit., p. 123.

^{page 282 note 6} I am much indebted to Mr. Piggott for this information, and for drawings of the fragments.

^{page 282 note 7} Sussex Arch. Coll. lxxi, p, 76; pl. xii, no. 2; Antiquity, March 1930, p. 32.

^{page 282 note 8} Antiq. Journ. viii, 468.

^{page 283 note 1} Curwen, Sussex (County Archaeologies), p. 139; J. R. Mortimer, Forty Years Researches, pl. vii (from Howe Hill, Duggleby, Yorks.).

^{page 283 note 2} T. Bateman, Vestiges, p. 43; Ten Years' Digging, p. 286; Man, 1906, no. 44, p. 69.

^{page 283 note 3} Arch. Journ. xxxviii, 132—3.

^{page 283 note 4} It is hoped to publish the results of research on these lines before long.