Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:29:45.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ancient Rome mapped

Review products

AndreaCarandini (ed.). The atlas of ancient Rome: biography and portraits of the city. Volume 1: text and images; volume 2: tables and indexes. 2017. 1280 pages, 532 colour and b&w illustrations, 9 tables. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 978-0-691-16347-5 hardback $199.50 & £148.95.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2017

Bernard Frischer*
Affiliation:
2804 South Saint Remy Circle, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA (Email: bernard.d.frischer@gmail.com)

Extract

When I first began my teaching career in 1976 at the University of California, Los Angeles, the subject of Roman topography was difficult to teach to English-speaking students. Most of the scholarship was written in Italian, and much of the rest was in French and German. Over the past 40 years the situation has changed significantly. We now have two useful introductory surveys in English: Coarelli's Rome and environs (2014) and Claridge's Rome: an Oxford archaeological guide (2010). We also have a host of monographic studies and, since 1988, innumerable articles and book reviews in the Journal of Roman Archaeology. Richardson's (1992) A new topographical dictionary of ancient Rome updated the one venerable but antiquated English reference work that we had long had: Platner and Ashby's (1926) A topographical dictionary of ancient Rome. Meanwhile, at least for polyglot scholars, the situation became even more favourable with the appearance of Steinby's (19922001) Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae (LTUR), a collaborative work by a distinguished international team writing in Italian, French, German and English, with around 2300 individual entries on specific sites and monuments of the ancient city.

Type
Book reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldassarri, P. 2013. Alla ricerca del tempio perduto: indagini archeologiche a Palazzo Valentini e il templum divi Traiani et divae Plotinae. Archeologia Classica 64 NS II (3): 371481.Google Scholar
Claridge, A. 2010. Rome: an Oxford archaeological guide (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 2014. Rome and environs: an archaeological guide. Translated by J.J. Clauss & D.P. Harmon (updated edition). Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hannah, R. & Magli, G.. 2011. The role of the sun in the Pantheon's design and meaning. Numen 58: 486513. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852711X577050 Google Scholar
Haselberger, L. (ed.). 2014. The Horologium of Augustus: debate and context (JRA Supplement 99). Portsmouth (RI): Journal of Roman Archaeology.Google Scholar
Macdonald, W. 2002. The Pantheon: design, meaning, and progeny (2nd edition, with a new foreword by J. Pinto). Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marder, T.A. & Wilson Jones, M. (ed.). 2015. The Pantheon from antiquity to the present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139015974 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platner, S.B. & Ashby, T.. 1926. A topographical dictionary of ancient Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. jr. 1992. A new topographical dictionary of ancient Rome. Baltimore (MD): Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinby, E.M. (ed.). 1992–2001. Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae (6 volumes). Rome: Quasar.Google Scholar
Volpe, R. & Parisi, A.. 2009. Alla ricerca di una scoperta: Felice de Fredis e il luogo di ritrovamento del Laocoonte. Bullettino della Commissione Archeologica Comunale di Roma 119: 81109.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. 2012. Roma Quadrata, Archaic huts, the House of Augustus, and the orientation of Palatine Apollo. Journal of Roman Archaeology 25: 371–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047759400001252 Google Scholar
Zink, S. 2012. Old and new archaeological evidence for the plan of the Palatine Temple of Apollo. Journal of Roman Archaeology 25: 388402. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047759400001264 Google Scholar
Zink, S. & Piening, H.. 2009. Haec aurea templa: the Palatine Temple of Apollo and its polychromy. Journal of Roman Archaeology 22: 109–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047759400020614 Google Scholar