Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T06:26:29.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contextualising the birth of Mediterranean Archaeoseismology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2014

Simon Jusseret
Simon Jusseret*
Affiliation:
*Aegean Interdisciplinary Studies (AegIS-CEMA-INCAL), Université catholique de Louvain, Place B. Pascal 1, L3.03.13, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium (E-mail: Simon.Jusseret@uclouvain.be)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Archaeoseismology, investigating the effects of earthquakes on archaeological remains, has developed in recent decades into a flourishing multidisciplinary effort bringing together archaeologists, historians, geologists, seismologists, architects and engineers. Initially focusing on historical archaeological contexts in theMediterranean (cf. Stiros & Jones 1996), archaeoseismology—also known as earthquake archaeology (see Sintubin forthcoming for terminology)—has nowadays extended its traditional scope to prehistoric and historical cultures worldwide (see contributions in Sintubin et al. 2010 and Silva et al. 2011 for recent examples).

Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 88 , Issue 341 , September 2014 , pp. 964 - 974
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnew, D.C. 2002. History of seismology, in Lee, W.H.K., Kanamori, H., Jennings, P.C. & Kisslinger, C. (ed.) International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology, part A (International Geophysics Series 81A): 3–11. Amsterdam: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambraseys, N.N. 2005. Archaeoseismology and neocatastrophism. Seismological Research Letters 76: 560–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.76.5.560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambraseys, N.N. & Adams, R.D.. 1998. The Rhodes earthquake of 26 June 1926. Journal of Seismology 2: 267–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009706415417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, V. 2006. Archaeoseismology in the Atalanti region, central mainland Greece: theories, methods and practice (British Archaeological Reports international series 1552). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Caputo, R. & Helly, B.. 2008. The use of distinct disciplines to investigate past earthquakes. Tectonophysics 453: 7–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2007.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Montessus de Ballore, F. 1906. Les tremblements de terre. Géographie séismologique. Paris: Librairie Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Evans, A. 1921. The Palace of Minos. A comparative account of the successive stages of the early Cretan civilization as illustrated by the discoveries at Knossos. Volume I: the Neolithic and Early and Middle Minoan ages. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Evans, A. 1928a. The Palace of Minos. A comparative account of the successive stages of the early Cretan civilization as illustrated by the discoveries at Knossos. Volume II: part I. Fresh lights on origins and external relations: the restoration in town and palace after seismic catastrophe towards close of M.M.III, and the beginnings of the new era. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Evans, A. 1928b. Crete said to be subject to series of earthquakes. Daily Colonist, 27 November 1928.Google Scholar
Fouqué, F. 1879. Santorin et ses éruptions. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Frohlich, C. 2006. Deep earthquakes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107297562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, C.B. 1912. Comte de Montessus de Ballore. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2: 217–23.Google Scholar
Hinzen, K.-G. 2005. Archaeoseismological case study of the main building of Kerkrade-Holzkuil, in Tichelman, G. (ed.) Het villacomplex Kerkrade-Holzkuil (ADC-Rapport 155): 407–20. Amersfoort: ADC Archeoprojecten.Google Scholar
Howell, B.F. Jr. 1986. History of ideas on the cause of earthquakes. Eos 67: 1323–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/EO067i046p01323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R.E. & Stiros, S.C.. 2000. The advent of archaeoseismology in the Mediterranean, in McGuire, W.J., Griffiths, D.R., Hancock, P.L. & Stewart, I.S. (ed.) The archaeology of geological catastrophes (Geological Society Special Publication 171): 25–32. London: Geological Society.Google Scholar
Jusseret, S. & Sintubin, M.. 2013. The origins of an old myth: Sir Arthur Evans, Claude Schaeffer and the seismic destruction of Late Bronze Age eastern Mediterranean civilizations. Seismological Research Letters 84: 94–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1785/0220120098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovach, R.L. & Nur, A.. 2006. Earthquakes and archeology: neocatastrophism or science? Eos 87: 317–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006EO320003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanciani, R. 1918. Segni di terremoti negli edifizi di Roma antica. Bullettino della Commissione Archeologica Comunale di Roma 45: 3–28.Google Scholar
MacGillivray, J.A. 2000. Minotaur. Sir Arthur Evans and the archaeology of the Minoan myth. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Manning, S.W. 2010. Chronology and terminology, in Cline, E.H. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of the Bronze Age Aegean: 11–28. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rapp, G. Jr. 1986. Assessing archaeological evidence for seismic catastrophies. Geoarchaeology 1: 365–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gea.3340010403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schliemann, H. 1880. Ilios: the city and country of the Trojans: the results of researches and discoveries on the site of Troy and throughout the Troad in the years 1871-72-73-78-79. Including an autobiography of the author. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Silva, P.G., Sintubin, M. & Reicherter, K.. 2011. New advances in studies of earthquake archaeology and palaeoseismology. Quaternary International 242: 1–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2011.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sintubin, M. 2011. Archaeoseismology: past, present and future. Quaternary International 242: 4–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2011.03.056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sintubin, M. Forthcoming. Archaeoseismology, in Beer, M., Kougioumtzoglou, I.A., Patelli, E. & Au, I.S.-K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of earthquake engineering. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Sintubin, M. & Stewart, I.S.. 2008. A logical methodology for archaeoseismology: a proof of concept at the archaeological site of Sagalassos, southwest Turkey. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 98: 2209–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1785/0120070178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sintubin, M., Stewart, I.S., Niemi, T. & Altunel, E.. 2008. Earthquake archaeology-just a good story? Seismolological Research Letters 79: 767–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.79.6.767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sintubin, M., Stewart, I.S., Niemi, T. & Altunel, E.. (ed.). 2010. Ancient earthquakes (Geological Society of America Special Paper 471). Boulder (CO): Geological Society of America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiros, S.C. 1996. Identification of earthquakes from archaeological data: methodology, criteria and limitations, in Stiros, S. & Jones, R.E. (ed.) Archaeoseismology (British School at Athens Fitch Laboratory Occasional Paper 7): 129–52. Athens: Institute of Geology and Mineral Exploration & the British School at Athens.Google Scholar
Stiros, S. & Jones, R.E. (ed.). 1996. Archaeoseismology (British School at At hens Fitch Laboratory Occasional Paper 7). Athens: Institute of Geology and Mineral Exploration & the British School at Athens.Google Scholar
Turner, H.H. 1926. Earthquakes in Crete. The Times (London, England), 24 September 1926, p. 13.Google Scholar
Udías, A. 1999. Principles of seismology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, P. & Hankey, V.. 1989. Aegean Bronze Age chronology. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar