Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T10:59:59.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Human Evolution Neanderthal Man

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arambourg, C. (1955). ‘A Recent Discovery in Human Paleontology: Atlanthropus of Ternifine (Algeria)’, Amer. J. Phys. Anthrop., n.s. 13, 1916.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, G. A., and Birdsell, J. B. (1953). ‘Ecology and the Protohominids’, Amer. Anthrop. 55, 48198.Google Scholar
Breitinger, E. (1955). ‘Das Schãdelfragment von Swanscombe und das “Praesapiensproblem”,’ Mitt. Anthr. Ges. Wien, 8485, 145.Google Scholar
Breitinger, E. (1957). ‘Zur phyletischen Evolution von Homo sapiens’, Anthrop. Anz., 21, 6283.Google Scholar
Bunak, V. V. (Ed.) (1941). Antropologiya. (Moscow.)Google Scholar
Coon, C. S. (1939). Races of Europe. (New York.)Google Scholar
Coon, C. S. (1959). ‘Race and Ecology in Man’, Cold Spring Harbor Symposia, 24, 153159.Google Scholar
Count, E. W. (1947). ‘Brain and Body Weight in Man: Their Antecedents in Growth and Evolution’, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 46, 10, 9931122.Google Scholar
De Beer, G. R. (1948). ‘Embryology and the Evolution of Man’, R. Broom Commem. Vol. (Pretoria), 18190.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1955). Evolution, Genetics and Man. (New York; London.)Google Scholar
Dzierzykraj-Rogalski, T., and Modrzewska, K. (1955). Zarys antropologa dia medykóiv. (Warsaw.)Google Scholar
Eickstedt, E. Von (1938). Rassenbunde und Rassengeschichte der Menschheit. (2nd Ed.) (Stuttgart.)Google Scholar
Eiseley, L. C. (1955). ‘Fossil Man and Human Evolution’, Yearbook of Anthropology 1952–4. 6178. (New York.)Google Scholar
Eiseley, L. C. (1959). ‘Alfred Russel Wallace’, Sci. Amer. 200, 2, 7084.Google Scholar
Hill, W. C. O. (1953). Man’s Ancestry. (Springfield, Ill.)Google Scholar
Howell, F. C. (1952). ‘Pleistocene Glacial Ecology and the Evolution of “Classic Neanderthal” Man’, Sth. West J. Anthrop. (Albuquerque) 8, 377410.Google Scholar
Howells, W. W. (1959). Man in the Making. Garden City N.Y.Google Scholar
Hrdlička, A. (1927). ‘The Neanderthal Phase of Man’, J. Roy. Anthrop. Inst, 57, 24974.Google Scholar
Hürzeler, J. (1958). ‘Oreopithecus bambolii Gervais’, Verh. Naturf. Ges. Basel, 69, 148.Google Scholar
Le Gros Clark, W. E. (1955). The Fossil Evidence for Human Evolution. (Chicago.)Google Scholar
Le Gros Clark, W. E. (1958). ‘Bones of Contention’. J. Roy. Anthrop. Inst, 88, 11, 13145.Google Scholar
Malá, L., Prokopec, M., and Troníček, Ch. (1956). Po stopdch vfvoje clovéka. (Prague.)Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1928). Lehrbuch der Anthropologie (2nd Ed.). (Jena.)Google Scholar
Matiegka, J. (1937). Filosofie somaticko-anthropologická. (Prague.)Google Scholar
Montagu, M. F. A. (1940). ‘The Stone Age of Mount Carmel’, vol. 11. By McCown, T. D. and Keith, A., Amer. Anthrop., 42, 51822.Google Scholar
Montagu, M. F. A. (1951). An Introduction to Physical Anthropology. (2nd Ed.) (Springfield, Ill.)Google Scholar
Montagu, M. F. A. (1957). ‘The Chin of the Kanam Mandible, Amer. Anthrop., 59, 3358.Google Scholar
Movius, H. L. (1953). ‘The Mousterian Cave of Teshik Tash, Southeastern Uzbekistan, Central, Asia’, Amer. School Prehist. Res. Bull., 17, 1171.Google Scholar
Nesturkh, M. F. (1958). Proiskhozhdenye cheloveka. (Moscow.)Google Scholar
Oakley, K. P. (1953). ‘Dating Fossil Human Remains’, Anthrop. Today, 4356. (Chicago.)Google Scholar
Oakley, K. P. (1958). ‘Physical Anthropology in the British Museum’, The Scope of Phys. Anthr., 514. (Ed. Roberts, D. F. and Weiner, J. S..)Google Scholar
Rieseneeld, A. (1955). ‘The Variability of the Temporal Lines, Its Causes and Effects’, Amer. J. Phys. Anthrop., n.s. 13, 599620.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. T. (1954). ‘The Genera and Species of the Australopithecinae’, Amer. J. Phys. Anthrop., n.s. 12, 181200.Google Scholar
Roginsky, J. J. and Levin, M. F. (1955). Osnovy antropologa. (Moscow.)Google Scholar
Saller, K. (1930). Leitfaden der Anthropologie. (Berlin.)Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. (1951). The Meaning of Evolution. (Mentor Book Ed.) (New York.)Google Scholar
Stolyhwo, K. (1937). ‘Les praenéanderthaloides et les postnéanderthaloides et leur rapport avec le race du Neanderthal’, Etnolog (Ljubljana), 10, 147168.Google Scholar
Skerlj, B. (1951). ‘Danasnji problemi evolucije ¿loveka’, Arh. Vest. (Ljubljana), 3, 4059.Google Scholar
Skerlj, B. (1956). ‘Vloga in mesto neandertalcev v éloveSki evoluciji’, Arh. Vest. (Ljubljana), 7, 34768.Google Scholar
Thoma, A. (1957/8). ‘Métissage ou transformation? Essai sur les hommes fossiles de Palestine’, L’Anthropologie, 61, 470502; 62, 3052.Google Scholar
Vallois, H. V. (1954a). ‘La capacité crânienne chez les Primates supérieurs et le “Rubicon cérébral”,’ Comptes rendus de séances de L’Acad. des. Sciences, 238, 134951.Google Scholar
Vallois, H. V. (1954b). ‘Neanderthals and Praesapiens’, J. Roy. Anthrop. Inst, 84, 11.Google Scholar
Vallois, H. V. (1958). La Grotte de Fontéchevade. 2. Anthropologie. Mém. 29, Arch. Inst. Paléont. hum. (Paris.)Google Scholar
Wanke, A. (1955). ‘Pròba klasyfikacji kopalnych form ludrkich metodi punktów odniesienia’, Przegl. Antropol., 21, 110617.Google Scholar
Wiercinski, A. (1956). ‘Zagadnienie wystepowania form Homo sapiens we wczesnym i srodkowym plejstocenie’, Przegl. Antropol., 22, 26786.Google Scholar