Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:51:08.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thermoluminescence and Glozel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Hugh McKerrell ,
Vagn Mejdahl ,
Henri François  and
Guy Portal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The advance of new scientific methods, in particular the thermoluminescence technique for analysis of ceramic objects (Aitken and Fleming, 1972; Perlman et al., 1972), have opened up new possibilities for investigation of the mysterious finds at Glozel. As a first contribution we describe in this article the thermoluminescence analysis of a number of typical Glozelian objects: inscribed clay tablets, face urns, sexual idols, small vessels (lamps) and bobines. Our results are in marked contrast with earlier assumptions of forgery: all objects investigated prove to be genuine and give a preliminary date within the period 700 BC-AD 100.

Type
Articles
Information
Antiquity , Volume 48 , Issue 192 , December 1974 , pp. 265
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, M. J., and Fleming, S. J.. 1972. Thermoluminescence dosimetry in archaeological dating, in (ed.) Attix, F. H., Topics in radiation dosimetry, Supplement I, 1–78 (New York and London).Google Scholar
Aitken, M. J., Moorey, P. R. S. and Ucko, P. J.. 1971. The authenticity of vessels and figures in the Haçilar style, Archaeometry, XIII (2), 89–141.Google Scholar
Breuil, H. 1926. Les découvertes de Glozel, L’Anthropologie, XXXVI, 543–8.Google Scholar
Breuil, H. 1927. À propos de Glozel, Bull. Soc. Préhist. Française, XXXIV, 142–00.Google Scholar
Champion, B. 1928. Observations techniques sur les trouvailles de Glozel (Paris).Google Scholar
Coutil, L. 1927. Les vases à figure humaine et les bobines de Glozel, Bull. Soc. Préhist. Française, XXIV, 1–11.Google Scholar
Crawford, O. G. S. 1927 ‘L’Affaire Glozel’, Antiquity, 1, 181–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, S. J. 1970. Thermoluminescent dating: refinement of the quartz inclusion method, Archaeometry, XII, 133–46.Google Scholar
Franchet, L. 1926. Les fouilles de Glozel (Allier), Revue Scientifique, LXIV, 649–57.Google Scholar
Garrod, D. 1968. Recollections of Glozel, Antiquity, XLII, 172–7.Google Scholar
Gordon, C. H. 1971. Forgotten scripts (Harmonds-worth).Google Scholar
Isnard, G. 1959. Faux et imitation dans l’art (Paris).Google Scholar
La Commission Internationale. 1927. Fouilles de Glozel: Rapport de la Commission Internationale, Revue Anthropologique, XXVII, 389–416.Google Scholar
Mejdahl, V. 1970. Measurement of environmental radiation of archaeological excavation sites, Archaeometry, XII, 147–59.Google Scholar
Mejdahl, V. 1972. Dosimetry techniques in thermoluminescence dating, Risø Report No. 261. Danish Atomic Energy Commission.Google Scholar
Morlet, A. 1929. Glozel (Paris).Google Scholar
Morlet, A. 1969. Glozel: corpus des inscriptions (Montpellier).Google Scholar
Morlet, A. 1970. Petit historique de l’affaire de Glozel (Marsat: first published Paris 1932).Google Scholar
Morlet, A. and Fradin, É.. 1925. Nouvelle station néolithique (Vichy).Google Scholar
Perlman, I., Asaro, F. and Michel, H. V.. 1972. Nuclear applications in art and archaeology, Annual Review of Nuclear Science, XX, 383–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinach, S. 1928. Ephémerides de Glozel (Paris).Google Scholar
Rieth, A. 1967. Vorzeit gefälscht (Tubingen). (English translation, Archaeological fakes, London, 1970.)Google Scholar
Sannie, C. 1953. L’expertise des oeuvres d’art, Revue Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique, VII (i), 207–10.Google Scholar
Söderman, H. 1957. Policeman’s lot (New York).Google Scholar
Tovar, A. 1961. The ancient languages of Spain and Portugal (New York).Google Scholar
Vayson De Pradenne, A. 1927a. Une visite à Glozel, Bull. Soc. Préhist. Française, XXIV, 185–6.Google Scholar
Vayson De Pradenne, A. 1927b. Nouvelles visites et fouilles de contrôle à Glozel, Bull. Soc. Préhist. Française, XXIV, 218–21.Google Scholar
Vayson De Pradenne, A. 1927c. La chronologie de Glozel, Bull. Soc. Préhist. Française, XXIV, 293–319.Google Scholar
Vayson De Pradenne, A. 1928. L’Affaire de Glozel (Paris).Google Scholar
Vayson De Pradenne, A. 1930. The Glozel forgeries, Antiquity, IV, 210–22 Google Scholar