Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T11:02:02.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multi-faceted analyses of Poland's Bronze and Early Iron Age hoards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2023

Marcin Maciejewski*
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Poland
*
*Author for correspondence ✉ marcin.maciejewski@umcs.pl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bronze and Early Iron Age hoards in Poland are the focus of a multi-faceted study combining archival research with laboratory analyses and landscape studies. The diverse dataset is expected to reveal new insights into the phenomenon of metal deposition.

Type
Project Gallery
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd.

Hoard studies to the present day

Most of Poland's Bronze and Early Iron Age hoards were discovered in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, and their find locations and contexts are rarely known. It was uncommon at the time to collect potsherds and less visually attractive items, while any samples and organic remains were not retained at all. The recovered metal items were dispersed among many collections, and some undocumented and uncatalogued finds went missing during the Second World War (Blajer Reference Blajer2001). The twenty-first century saw an intensification in investigations conducted by amateur metal detectorists, resulting in a significant increase in the number of new finds. Polish legal regulations allow for such investigations if permission is obtained from the local heritage authorities and the collected artefacts are handed to a museum. Despite instances of successful cooperation between amateurs and archaeologists (e.g. Blajer et al. Reference Blajer2022: 14–28), illegal investigations remained a problem (Maciejewski Reference Maciejewski2018: 279–86).

Despite some slightly earlier work (the Rosko Hoard, Maciejewski Reference Maciejewski2019), it was not until the second decade of the twenty-first century that several new projects aimed at obtaining more data on Bronze and Early Iron Age hoards were launched. These studies have encompassed both the long-known and the newly discovered deposits (Rząska & Walenta Reference Rząska and Walenta2017; Baron et al. Reference Baron, Maciejewski, Jarysz, Kuźbik, Łaciak, Łucejko, Mackiewicz, Miazga, Nowak and Sych2019; Dzięgielewski et al. Reference Dzięgielewski, Longa, Langer and Hoyo2019; Michalak & Orlicka-Jasnoch Reference Michalak and Orlicka-Jasnoch2019; Michalak & Przechrzta Reference Michalak and Przechrzta2020; Kaczmarek et al. Reference Kaczmarek, Szczurek and Krzysiak2021; Blajer et al. Reference Blajer2022; Gackowski et al. Reference Gackowski, Gawiński, Sosnowski and Dąbrowski2022; Maciejewski et al. Reference Maciejewski, Szczepański, Miazga and Kosińskiin press; Figure 1). While typological classifications are still made, the examination of traces of production, use-wear and destruction patterns in copper-alloy items is significant. Morphometric analyses with the use of 3D scanning are also being conducted. Studies of organic remains found with metal artefacts, radiocarbon dating and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analyses of metal and ceramic vessels containing the deposited metal items are helping reveal more about the find contexts. Places of deposition and their relationship with the landscape are being investigated through geophysical surveys, excavation and geostatistical tools.

Figure 1. Location of hoards mentioned in the text: white dots represent locations of hoards examined in the Biography of Hoards project; black dots represent locations of hoards examined in other multi-faceted projects (figure by M. Maciejewski).

Discussion is the way forward

Since 2018, scholarly meetings of the Mass Deposition Phenomenon Research Group in Poland have provided an excellent forum for the discussion of metal hoards, the scope of possible analyses and research methods and conclusions. Despite a break due to the pandemic, seven such meetings have been hosted by various museums and universities.

These Polish projects, although numerous, are not unique; other European countries are also conducting research in this way. Scholars from various research centres seek new methods of analysing and interpreting deposits of metal items, and examples of such studies were presented at the 26th European Association of Archaeologists Virtual Annual Meeting in 2020. The deposition of metal items was a pan-European phenomenon yet remains extremely enigmatic as a cultural practice. Studies on this issue require a constant dialogue between researchers from different parts of the continent.

A biography of hoards: multi-faceted studies

The Rosko Hoard (north Greater Poland), which was discovered accidentally in 1985, plays a crucial role in the Biography of Hoards project (full title: A biography of Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages hoards. A multi-faceted analysis of metal objects related to monumental constructions in Poland). At the onset of the twenty-first century, Henryk Machajewski successfully located the deposition spot and launched excavations. The results, combined with witness accounts, showed that the artefacts had been deposited in a stonework and earthwork raised specifically for the purpose (Maciejewski Reference Maciejewski2019; Figure 2). Subsequent archival studies demonstrated that there might have been more hoards deposited in such monumental structures, which were clearly visible in the landscape and required a significant amount of labour. Following the launch of the Biography of Hoards project, three such places were identified in Greater Poland: Kaliszany and Stołężyn in the north and Gogolewo in the south. A fourth hoard from Uścikówiec also in northern Greater Poland, which serves as a control sample, resembles them closely except for the fact that no contextual information on any surface features has been recorded. All these hoards date to the Late Bronze Age.

Figure 2. Remains of structure around the Rosko hoard: a) dark grey sand; b) contemporary ditches; c) bronze axes; d) bronze axes in situ; e) stones (figure by M. Maciejewski).

The archival studies aim to identify equivalent hoards from monumental structures from other parts of Poland. Library searches will also verify if any other European regions have yielded similar structures connected to the deposition of goods (e.g. a deposit from Plestin in Mecklenburg, northern Germany, is in many respects similar to that from Rosko, see Sprockhoff Reference Sprockhoff1956: 51).

Work continues to identify the exact location of the Stołężyn, Uścikówiec and Gogolewo hoards and to characterise potential surface structures at these sites. This involves examining archival maps, analysing airborne laser scanning data and aerial photos available in the public domain, creating point clouds with UVA lidar scanning, making and analysing new aerial photos, and conducting metal detector and geophysical surveys. Excavation of one of the sites may also be possible.

In Kaliszany, excavations and geophysical surveys are underway within the well-defined stonework and earthwork in which the hoard was discovered. The first season covered 25 per cent of the structure, revealing an elaborate stone setting and a layer containing broken pottery vessels and human and faunal remains (Figures 4 & 5). These exciting finds allow further anthropological, archaeozoological, radiocarbon and organic residue analyses.

Traceological studies of copper-alloy artefacts are also part of the project, and might prove particularly telling in the case of the Rosko Hoard, which consists mainly of typologically similar axes. The axes will undergo morphometric analyses with 3D scanning to determine how many casting moulds were used in their manufacture (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Workflow in the Biography of Hoards project (figure by M. Maciejewski).

Figure 4. Excavation of earth-and-stone structure around the Kaliszany hoard (archaeological site no. 3) (photograph by W. Krzywicka).

Figure 5. Pottery (A, C), animal bones (B), a human skull (C, D), and a flint tool (D) excavated from underneath the stone layer in Kaliszany (archaeological site no. 3) (photograph by Biography of Hoards project excavation team; figure by M. Maciejewski).

In the case of Rosko, Kaliszany, Stołężyn and Uścikówiec, studies on the relationship between the hoard's place of deposition and the surrounding cultural landscape have been undertaken previously. We will examine the situation of Gogolewo assemblage in the same manner (Figure 3). The fundamental research question of the project is whether the stone and earth structure at Rosko is a unique feature or is part of a local (north Greater Poland), regional (the Oder Urnfield Culture or Urnfield Cultures) or European tradition. Collecting a wide range of diverse data for the hoards mentioned above may also demonstrate what similarities and differences between finds can reveal about the phenomenon of metal object deposition.

Funding statement

The article is part of the project ‘A biography of Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages hoards. A multi-faceted analysis of metal objects related to monumental constructions in Poland’ of the National Science Centre Poland (2021/41/B/HS3/00038). This research was funded in whole by National Science Centre Poland 2021/41/B/HS3/00038. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC-BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript (AAM) version arising from this submission.

References

Baron, J., Maciejewski, M., Jarysz, R., Kuźbik, R., Łaciak, D., Łucejko, J.J., Mackiewicz, M., Miazga, B., Nowak, K. & Sych, D.. 2019. Phenomenon of repetition: deposits from Karmin. Wrocław: Instytu Archeologii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.Google Scholar
Blajer, W. 2001. Skarby przedmiotów metalowych z epoki brązu i wczesnej epoki żelaza na ziemiach polskich. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka.Google Scholar
Blajer, W. et al. 2022. Ku czci bogów i ludzi. Skarby z okolic Sanoka. Studium interdyscyplinarne. Sanok, Lublin: Muzeum Historyczne w Sanoku, Wydawnictwo UMCS.Google Scholar
Dzięgielewski, K., Longa, A., Langer, J. & Hoyo, M. Moskal-del. 2019. Contextualisation of the Early Iron Age hoard of bronze objects discovered in Gdynia-Karwiny, site 1. Recherches Archéologiques NS 10: 2178. https://doi.org/10.33547/RechACrac.NS10.02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gackowski, J., Gawiński, S., Sosnowski, M. & Dąbrowski, H.P. (ed.). 2022. Pradziejowe cymelia województwa kujawskopomorskiego: skarby ludności kultury łużyckiej z Brudzynia, Cierpic i Elgiszewa. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego w Toruniu.Google Scholar
Kaczmarek, M., Szczurek, G. & Krzysiak, A. (ed.). 2021. Kaliska I: the Late Bronze Age metal hoard from Pomerania (Hyperborea 6). Poznań: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu.Google Scholar
Kobyliński, Z. (ed.). 2014. Contextualisation of the hoard from Vettersfelde/Witaszkowo: archaeological excavation at Kozów, site 2 in the Lubusz Land. Zielona Góra: Fundacja Archeologiczna.Google Scholar
Maciejewski, M. 2018. Perspektywy badań nad skarbami z późnej epoki brązu i wczesnej epoki żelaza. Śląskie Sprawozdania Archeologiczne 60: 279313.Google Scholar
Maciejewski, M. 2019. The Rosko Hoard – a roadsign? Research and its perspectives: mass deposition of metal objects, Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages in Poland. Praehistorische Zeitschrift 94: 233–51. https://doi.org/10.1515/pz-2019-0012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maciejewski, M., Szczepański, Ł., Miazga, B. & Kosiński, T.. In press. Późnobrązowy skarb ozdób z Lubnowych Wielkich na Powiślu (gmina Susz).Google Scholar
Michalak, A. & Orlicka-Jasnoch, J. (ed.). 2019. Skarb z Nowego Kramska. Analizy. Konteksty. Zielona Góra: Muzeum Archeologiczne Środkowego Nadodrza w Zielonej Górze.Google Scholar
Michalak, A. & Przechrzta, E. (ed.). 2020. Marcinowice. Skarb przedmiotów metalowych z wczesnej epoki brązu. Zielona Góra: Muzeum Archeologiczne Środkowego Nadodrza w Zielonej Górze.Google Scholar
Rząska, H. & Walenta, K. (ed.). 2017. Brązy ukryte w ziemi… Łużycki skarb z Charzyków. Chojnice: Muzeum Historyczno-Etnograficzne im. J. Rydzkowskiego w Chojnicach.Google Scholar
Sprockhoff, E. 1956. Jungbronzezeitliche Hortfunde der Südzone des nordischen Kreises (Periode V), Volume I. Mainz: Verlag des Römisch-germanischen Zentralmuseums.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Location of hoards mentioned in the text: white dots represent locations of hoards examined in the Biography of Hoards project; black dots represent locations of hoards examined in other multi-faceted projects (figure by M. Maciejewski).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Remains of structure around the Rosko hoard: a) dark grey sand; b) contemporary ditches; c) bronze axes; d) bronze axes in situ; e) stones (figure by M. Maciejewski).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Workflow in the Biography of Hoards project (figure by M. Maciejewski).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Excavation of earth-and-stone structure around the Kaliszany hoard (archaeological site no. 3) (photograph by W. Krzywicka).

Figure 4

Figure 5. Pottery (A, C), animal bones (B), a human skull (C, D), and a flint tool (D) excavated from underneath the stone layer in Kaliszany (archaeological site no. 3) (photograph by Biography of Hoards project excavation team; figure by M. Maciejewski).