Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T11:12:29.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the historiographical orientation of Chinese archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Lothar von Falkenhausen
Lothar von Falkenhausen*
Affiliation:
Art History Department, Dickson Hall, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles CA 90024, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This year, as it seems every year, news comes from China of another spectacular archaeological discovery. What is the framework of ideas and research that studies these treasures? And how does the special character of Chinese history, with its long, near-continuous record of dynasties, written sources and encyclopaedic texts, give archaeology a different place, whether higher or lower, among the other historical and social sciences?

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 67 , Issue 257 , December 1993 , pp. 839 - 849
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson, J.G. 1923. An early Chinese culture. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of China, 45: 1–68.Google Scholar
Andersson, J.G. 1925. Preliminary report on archaeological research in Kansu.Beijing: Memoirs of the Geological Survey of China. Series A, vol. 5. Google Scholar
Andersson, J.G. 1943. Researches into the prehistory of the Chinese, Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities, 15: 1–304.Google Scholar
Andersson, J.G. 1947. Prehistoric sites in Honan, Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities, 19: 1–124.Google Scholar
Bagley, R.W. 1992. Changjiang bronzes and Shang archaeology, Proceedings of the International colloquium on Chinese art history 1991, Antiquities Part I: 214–55. Taipei: National Palace Museum.Google Scholar
Beasley, W.G., Pulleyblank, E.G. (eds.). 1961. Historians of China and Japan. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, K.C. 1981. Archaeology and Chinese historiography, World Archaeology, 13(2): 156–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, K.C. 1986. The archaeology of ancient China. 4th edition. New Haven (NJ): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Chavannes, E. 1895–1905. Les mémoires historiques de Se-ma Ts’ien. Paris: Leroux. (New edition in 6 vols. 1967–69. Paris: Librairie d’Amérique et d’Orient.)Google Scholar
Chow, T.T. 1960–1905. The May Fourth Movement: Intellectual revolution in modern China. Cambridge(MA): Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clunas, C. 1991–1905. Superfluous things: material culture and social status in early modern China. Cambridge: Polity.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaoxi, DU, Jiafang, Li & Zhaolin, SONG 1983. Zhongguo yuanshishehui shi. Beijing: Wenwu.Google Scholar
Zhengsheng, DU 1992. Kaoguxue yu Zhongguo gudaishi yanjiu, Kaogu, 1992(4): 335–46.Google Scholar
Elman, B.A. 1984–1905. From philosophy to philology: intellectual and social aspects of change in late imperial China. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Engels, F. 1884(1902). Der Ursprung der Familie. des Privateigentums und des Staates = The origin of the family, private property and the state. Chicago (IL): Kerr.Google Scholar
Falkenhausen, L.V. 1988(1902). Ritual music in Bronze Age China: an archaeological perspective. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. The regionalist paradigm in Chinese archaeology, in Kohl, P., & Fawcett, C. (ed.), Nationalism and the practice of Chinese archaeology. Doctoral dissertation, Los Angeles (CA): UCLA Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Ming, GAO 1987(1902). Zhongguo guwenzixue tonglun. Beijing: Wenwu.Google Scholar
Graham, A.C., 1978. Later Mohist logic ethics and science. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Moruo, Guo 1930. Zhongguo gudai shehui yanjiu. Shanghai. (Final revised edition 1978, Beijing: Sanlian.)Google Scholar
Moruo, Guo 1933. Buci tongzuan. Tokyo. (Reprinted 1983,Beijing: Kexue.)Google Scholar
Moruo, Guo, 1935. Liang Zhou jinwenci daxi tulu kaoshi. Tokyo. (Revised edition 1958, Beijing: Kexue.)Google Scholar
Hayashi, MlNAO 1964. In Shü seidó iki–no meishó– to yöto, Tóhó Gakuhó 34: 199–298.Google Scholar
Hopkirk, P., 1980. Foreign devils on the Silk Road: the search for the lost treasures and cities of Chinese Central Asia. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Hopkirk, P. 1982. Trespassers on the roof of the world. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Hummel, A.W. 1931. Ku Chieh–kang, Autobiography of a Chinese historian: being the preface to A symposium on Ancient Chinese history (Ku shih pien), translated and annotated by Arthur Hummel, W. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bianjihui, KAOGU 1992. Zhongguo wenming qiyuan yantaohui jiyao, Kaogu, 1992(6): 526–49.Google Scholar
Legge, J. 1868. The Shoo King. Oxford: Clarendon. The Chinese Classics 3.Google Scholar
Legge, J. 1872. The Ch’un Ts’ew with the Tso Chuen. Oxford: Clarendon Press.The Chinese Classics 5.Google Scholar
Li, C. (= Li Ji). 1977. Anyang. Seattle (WA): University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Li, JI et al. 1964–1972. Zhongguo kaogu baogaoji xinbian: Gu qiwu yanjiu zhuankan. Taibei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Link, P. 1992. Evening chats in Beijing. New York (NY): Norton.Google Scholar
Louie, K. 1980. Critiques of Confucius in contemporary China. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Olsen, J.W. 1992. Archaeology in China today, China Exchange News, 20(2): 3–6.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, E.G. 1964. The historiographical tradition, in Dawson, R. (ed.), The legacy of China: 143–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Xigui, QIU 1987. Wenzixue gaiyao. Beijing: Shangwu.Google Scholar
Rudolph, R.C. 1963. Preliminary notes on Sung archaeology, Journal of Asian Studies, 22: 169–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, L.A. 1971. Ku chieh–kang and China’s New History: nationalism and the quest for alternative traditions. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, L.A. 1971. Ku chieh–kang and China’s New History: nationalism and the quest for alternative traditions. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shaanxi Sheng Kaogu, YANJIUSUO et al. 1988. Q/n Shihuangling bingmayongkeng yihaokeng fajuebaogao, 1974–1984. Beijing: Wenwu.Google Scholar
Thompson, P.M. 1979. The Shen Tzu fragments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thorp, R.L. 1991. Erlitou and the search for the Xia, Early China, 16: 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, G. 1985. Loving the ancient in China, in MacBryde, I. (ed.), Who owns the past?: 175–95. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, GUOWEI 1927. Guantang jilin. Shanghai: Zhonghua.Google Scholar
Wang, N. 1988–89. Yangshao burial customs and social organization: a comment on the theory of Yangshao matrilineal society and its methodology, Early China, 11–12: 6–32.Google Scholar
Meiyuan, WEN & Zhonghang, QIN 1975. Qinyong yishu, Wenwu, 1975(11): 24–92.Google Scholar
Wenwu, BIANJIWEIYUANHUI. 1990. Wenwu kaogu gongzuo shinian, 1979–1989. Shanghai: Beijing. WenwuGoogle Scholar
Xia, NAI 1961. Kaoguxue lunwenji. Beijing: Kexue.Google Scholar
Xia, NAI 1978. Tantao Xia wenhua do jige wenti, Henan Wenbo Tongxun, 1978(1): 32–3.Google Scholar
Xia, NAI 1984. Chügoku bunmei–no kigen. Tokyo: NHK.Google Scholar
Xia, NAI 1990. What is archaeology? in Guldin, G.E. (ed.), Anthropology in China: 59–67. Armonk (NY): M.E. Sharpe. (Originally published in Kaogu 1984(10): 931–5, 948.)Google Scholar
Xusheng, XU 1959. 1959–nian xia Yuxi diaocha ‘Xiaxu’ de chubu baogao, Kaogu, 1959(11): 592–600.Google Scholar
Xusheng, XU 1960(1943). Zhongguo gushi de chuantongshuo shidai. 2nd enlarged edition. Beijing: Kexue.Google Scholar
Wenming, YAN 1986. Yangshao wenhua yanjiuzhong jige zhide zhongshi de wenti, in Lun Yangshao wenhua (= Zhongyuan Yanjiu Tekan 5) 18–36. Zhengzhou.Google Scholar
Wenming, YAN 1989. Yangshao wenhua yanjiu. Beijing: Wenwu.Google Scholar
Yin, W.C. 1986. A re–examination of the Erh–H–t’ou culture in Chang, K.C. (ed.), Studies of Shang archaeology: 1–13. New Haven (NJ): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
ZHONGGUO SHEHUIKEXUEYUAN KAOGU YANJIUSUO. 1984. Xin Zhongguo de kaogu faxian he yanjiu. Beijing: Wenwu.Google Scholar
ZHONGGUO SHEHUIKEXUEYUAN KAOGU YANTIUSUO. et al. 1988. Xia Xian Dongxiafeng. Beijing: Wenwu.Google Scholar
Hongxiang, ZHOU 1990. Xiashi wenhua yanjiu shumu. Hong Kong: Xianggang Daxue Zhongwenxi.Google Scholar
Yutong, ZHOU 1941. Wushinianlai Zhongguo zhi xin shixue Shilin (Shanghai) 4 1–36.Google Scholar