Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:31:04.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proteomics and Coast Salish blankets: a tale of shaggy dogs?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2011

Caroline Solazzo ,
Susan Heald ,
Mary W. Ballard ,
David A. Ashford ,
Paula T. DePriest ,
Robert J. Koestler  and
Matthew J. Collins
Caroline Solazzo
Affiliation:
1Departments of Biology, Archaeology and Chemistry, BioArCh, University of York, P.O. Box 373, York YO10 5YW, UK (correspondence email: solazzo.c@gmail.com) 2Museum Conservation Institute, Smithsonian Institution, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, MD 20746, USA
Susan Heald
Affiliation:
3National Museum of the American Indian, Cultural Resources Center (CRC), 4220 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, MD 20746, USA
Mary W. Ballard
Affiliation:
2Museum Conservation Institute, Smithsonian Institution, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, MD 20746, USA
David A. Ashford
Affiliation:
4Proteomics and Analytical Biochemistry Laboratory, Technology Facility, Department of Biology and Centre of Excellence in Mass Spectrometry, University of York, P.O. Box 373, York YO10 5YW, UK
Paula T. DePriest
Affiliation:
2Museum Conservation Institute, Smithsonian Institution, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, MD 20746, USA
Robert J. Koestler
Affiliation:
2Museum Conservation Institute, Smithsonian Institution, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, MD 20746, USA
Matthew J. Collins
Affiliation:
1Departments of Biology, Archaeology and Chemistry, BioArCh, University of York, P.O. Box 373, York YO10 5YW, UK (correspondence email: solazzo.c@gmail.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Identifying animals to species from relict proteins is a powerful new archaeological tool. Here the authors apply the method to answer questions relating to the Salish of west coast North America. Did they weave their blankets out of dog hair? The proteomic analysis shows that they did, interweaving it with goat, and that the woolly dog was increasingly superseded by sheep in the later nineteenth century.

Keywords

North Americanineteenth centuryCoast Salishtextilessheepgoatwoolly dog
Type
Research article
Information
Antiquity , Volume 85 , Issue 330 , December 2011 , pp. 1418 - 1432
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amoss, P.T. 1993. Hair of the dog: unravelling pre-contact Coast Salish social stratification, in Mattiana, A. & Montler, T. (ed.) American Indian linguistics and ethnography in honor of Laurence C. Thompson: 3–35. Missoula (MT): University of Montana.Google Scholar
Ashwell, R. 1978. Coast Salish, their art, culture and legends. Saanichton (BC) & Seattle (WA): Hancock House.Google Scholar
Barnett, H.G. 1938. The Coast Salish of Canada. American Anthropologist 40(1): 118–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barraclough, W. 1969. Dogs that were indigenous to the Pacific Northwest. British Columbia Historical News: 6–13.Google Scholar
Barsh, R.L., Jones, J.M. & Suttles, W.. 2002. History, ethnography, and archaeology of the Coast Salish woolly-dog, in Snyder, L.M. & Moore, E.A. (ed.) Dogs and people in social, working, economic and symbolic interaction (Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the International Council of Archaeozoology): 1–11. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Buckley, M., Collins, M., Thomas-Oates, J. & Wilson, J.C.. 2009. Species identification by analysis of bone collagen using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 23: 3843–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckley, M., Whitcher Kansa, S., Howard, S., Campbell, S., Thomas-Oates, J. & Collins, M.. 2010. Distinguishing between archaeological sheep and goat bones using a single collagen peptide. Journal of Archaeological Science 37: 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappellini, E., Gilbert, M.T.P., Geuna, F., Fiorentino, G., Hall, A., Thomas-Oates, J., Ashton, P.D., Ashford, D.A., Arthur, P., Campos, P.F., Kool, J., Willerslev, E. & Collins, M.J.. 2009. A multidisciplinary study of archaeological grape seeds. Naturwissenschaften 97(2): 205–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambery, A., Di Maro, A., Sanges, C., Severino, V., Tarantino, M., Lamberti, A., Parente, A. & Arcari, P.. 2009. Improved procedure for protein binder analysis in mural painting by LC-ESI/Q-q-TOF mass spectrometry: detection of different milk species by casein proteotypic peptides. Analytical Bioanalytical Chemistry 395: 2281–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clerens, S., Cornellison, C.D., Deb-Choudbury, S., Thomas, A., Plowman, J.E. & Dyer, J.M. 2010. Developing the wool proteome. Journal of Proteomics 73(9): 1722–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crockford, S.J. 1997. Osteometry of Makah and Coast Salish dogs. Burnaby (BC): Archaeology Press, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Crockford, S.J. 2000. A commentary on dog evolution: regional variation, breed development and hybridization with wolves, in Crockford, S.J. (ed.) Dogs through time: an archaeological perspective (British Archaeological Reports international series 889): 295–312. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Crockford, S.J. & Pye, C.J.. 1997. Forensic reconstruction of prehistoric dogs from the North West Coast. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 21: 149–53.Google Scholar
Fremout, W., Dhaenens, M., Saverwyns, S., Sanyova, J., Vandenabeele, P., Deforce, D. & Moens, L.. 2010. Tryptic peptide analysis of protein binders in works of art by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta 658: 156–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, G. 1877. Tribes of Western Washington and Northwestern Oregon (Contributions to North American ethnology 1). Washington (DC): Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Gustafson, P. 1980. Salish weaving. Vancouver (BC): Douglas & McIntyre.Google Scholar
Hill-Tout, C. 1907. The native races of the British Empire: British North America. 1, The far west, the home of the Salish and Déné. London: Archibald Constable and Company Ltd.Google Scholar
Hollemeyer, K., Altmeyer, W. & Heinzle, E.. 2002. Identification and quantification of feathers, down, and hair of avian and mammalian origin using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 74(23): 5960–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollemeyer, K., Altmeyer, W. & Heinzle, E.. 2007. Identification of furs of domestic dog, racoon dog, rabbit and domestic cat by hair analysis using MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry. Spectroscopy Europe 19(2): 8–15.Google Scholar
Hollemeyer, K., Altmeyer, W., Heinzle, E. & Pitra, C.. 2008. Species identification of Oetzi's clothing with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry based on peptide pattern similarities of hair digests. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 22: 2751–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howay, F.W. 1918. The dog's hair blankets of the Coast Salish. The Washington Historical Quarterly 9(2): 83–92.Google Scholar
Jones, M. 2005. Coast Salish: the beauty of everyday things, in Macnair, P., Stewart, J., Joseph, R. & Lenz, M.J. (ed.) Listening to our ancestors: the art of native life along the north Pacific Coast: 14–27. Washington (DC): National Museum of the American Indian, Smithsonian Institution in association with National Geographic.Google Scholar
Kane, P. 1971. Paul Kane's frontier: including Wanderings of an artist among the Indians of North America. Austin (TX): University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Kissell, M.L. 1929. Organized Salish blanket pattern. American Anthropologist 31(1): 85–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, H.W. 1928. American Indian costumes in the United States National Museum. Washington (DC): Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Ledyard, J. 1783. A journal of Captain Cook's last voyage to the Pacific Ocean, and in quest of a north-west passage, between Asia & America. Hartford: Printed and sold by Nathaniel Patten.Google Scholar
Mohs, G. 1992. Mountain goats and wooly dogs: the weaving industry of the Stó:lo Indians. Unpublished manuscript. Chilliwack: Stó:lo Nation Archives.Google Scholar
Nagorsen, D.W. & Keddie, G.. 2000. Late Pleistocene mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus) from Vancouver Island: biogeographic implications. Journal of Mammalogy 81(3): 666–75.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, R.L. 1936. The Quinault Indians. Seattle (WA): University of Washington.Google Scholar
Orchard, W.C. 1926. A rare Salish blanket (Leaflets of the Museum of the American Indian, Heye Foundation 5). New York: Museum of the American Indian, Heye Foundation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plowman, J.E., Bryson, W.G., Flanagan, L.M. & Jordan, T.W.. 2002. Problems associated with the identification of proteins in homologous families: the wool keratin family as a case study. Analytical Biochemistry 300(2): 221–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, J.E. 2005. A discovery journal: George Vancouver's first survey season-1792. Bloomington (IN): Trafford Publishing.Google Scholar
Schulting, R. 1994. The hair of the dog: the identification of a Coast Salish dog-hair blanket from Yale, British Columbia. The Canadian Journal of Archaeology 18: 57–76.Google Scholar
Scouler, J. 1905. Dr John Scouler's Journal of a voyage to N.W. America. [1824–'25–'26.] II. Leaving the Galapagos Islands for the North Pacific Coast. The Quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society 6(2): 159–205.Google Scholar
Smith, M.W. 1941. The Coast Salish of Puget Sound. American Anthropologist 43(2): 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suttles, W. 1987. Coast Salish essays. Vancouver (BC): Talonbooks.Google Scholar
Wells, O.N. 1969. Salish weaving. Primitive and modern. Sardis (BC): The author.Google Scholar
Willoughby, C.C. 1910. A new type of ceremonial blanket from the Northwest Coast. American Anthropologist 12(1): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wortmann, F.J., Phan, K.H. & Augustin, P.. 2003. Quantitative fiber mixture analysis by scanning electron microscopy. Part V: analyzing pure fiber samples and samples with small admixtures according to test method IWTO-58. Textile Research Journal 73(8): 727–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar