Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T11:45:23.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flow induced by a line sink in a quiescent fluid with surface-tension effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Lawrence K. Forbes
Affiliation:
Dept. of Math., The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Qld. 4072, Australia.
Graeme C. Hocking
Affiliation:
Dept. of Math., The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, W. A. 6009, Australia.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

When a line sink is placed beneath the free surface of an otherwise quiescent fluid of infinite depth, two different flow types are now known to be possible. One type of flow involves the fluid being drawn down toward the sink, and in the other type, a stagnation point forms at the surface immediately above the position of the sink.

This paper investigates the second of these two flow types, which involves a free-surface stagnation point. The effects of surface tension are included, and even when small, these are shown to have a very significant effect on the overall solution behaviour. We demonstrate by direct numerical calculation that there are regions of genuine non-uniqueness in the nonlinear solution, when the surface-tension parameter does not vanish. In addition, an asymptotic solution valid for small Froude number is derived.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1993

References

[1]Forbes, L. K. and Hocking, G. C., “Flow caused by a point sink in a fluid having a free surface”, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. B 32 (1990) 231249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Hocking, G. C., “Cusp-like free-surface flows due to a submerged source or sink in the presence of a flat or sloping bottom”, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. B 26 (1985) 470486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Hocking, G. C., “Infinite Froude number solutions to the problem of a submerged source or sink”, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. B 29 (1988) 401409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Hocking, G. C. and Forbes, L. K., “A note on the flow induced by a line sink beneath a free surface”, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. B 32 (1991) 251260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Imberger, J., “Selective withdrawal: a review”, 2nd International Symposium on Stratified Flows, Trondheim, Norway, 1980.Google Scholar
[6]King, A. C. and Bloor, M. I. G., “A note on the free surface induced by a submerged source at infinite Froude number”, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. B 30 (1988) 147156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Mekias, H. and Vanden-Broeck, J.-M., “Supercritical free-surface flow with a stagnation point due to a submerged source”, Phys. Fluids, Ser. A 1 (1989) 16941697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Peregrine, D. H., “A line source beneath a free surface”, Univ. Wisconsin Math. Res. Center Tech. Summ. Report 1248 (1972).Google Scholar
[9]Stroud, A. H. and Secrest, D., Gaussian quadrature formulas, (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1966).Google Scholar
[10]Stokes, G. G., Mathematical and Physical Papers, Vol. 1, (Cambridge University Press, 1880).Google Scholar
[11]Tuck, E. O. and Vanden-Broeck, J.-M., “A cusp-like free-surface flow due to a submerged source or sink”, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. B 25 (1984) 443450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Vanden-Broeck, J.-M., “The effects of surface tension on the shape of the Kirchhoff jet”, Phys. Fluids 27 (1984) 19331936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Vanden-Broeck, J.-M., “Rising bubbles in a two-dimensional tube with surface tension”, Phys. Fluids 27 (1984) 2602607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Vanden-Broeck, J.-M. and Keller, J. B., “Free surface flow due to a sink”, J. Fluid Mech. 175 (1987) 109117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Vanden-Broeck, J.-M., Schwartz, L. W. and Tuck, E. O., “Divergent low-Froude-number series expansion of nonlinear free-surface flow problems”, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A 361 (1978) 207224.Google Scholar