Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:01:12.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development of English tense and agreement morphology in Welsh–English bilingual children with and without specific language impairment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2019

Vasiliki Chondrogianni Open the ORCID record for Vasiliki Chondrogianni [Opens in a new window]  and
Hyowon Kwon
Vasiliki Chondrogianni*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences
Hyowon Kwon
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences
*
*Corresponding author. Email: v.chondrogianni@ed.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigated whether third person singular –s and past tense accuracy and error types can reveal distinct developmental patterns of agreement and tense acquisition in younger and older Welsh (L1) sequential bilingual (L2) English children with typical development (L2-TLD) and in younger children with language impairment (L2-SLI_Y). A group of older (L2-TLD_O; mean age = 93.72 months) and younger (L2-TLD_Y; mean age = 67 months) Welsh–English (TLD) bilingual children and a group of young (mean age = 63 months) children with SLI (L2-SLI_Y) age matched to the L2-TLD_Y group were administered the screening component of the Test of Early Grammatical Impairment. Results indicated that the three groups differed in their production of third person singular –s and regular past tense but not in accuracy on irregular past tense verbs, when vocabulary skills were considered. The L2-SLI_Y children produced similar error types to the L2-TLD_Y children, who differed from their L2-TLD_O peers in this respect. L2 children’s vocabulary size, nonverbal intelligence, and item-level factors, such as frequency and morphophonology, differentially contributed to their performance across the various morphemes. We discuss these results within current accounts of language development and impairment.

Keywords

child second language acquisitionsingularregular, and irregular past tensespecific language impairmentthird person
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , July 2019 , pp. 821 - 852
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armon-Lotem, S., & Meir, N. (2016). Diagnostic accuracy of repetition tasks for the identification of specific language impairment (SLI) in bilingual children: Evidence from Russian and Hebrew. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 51, 715–731. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12242CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modelling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (2014). Problems with tense marking in children with specific language impairment: Not how but when. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 369. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, E., & Paradis, J. (2013). Past tense production by English second language learners with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 56, 281–294. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0112)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blom, E., Paradis, J., & Duncan, T. S. (2012). Effects of input properties, vocabulary size, and L1 on the development of third person singular–s in child L2 English. Language Learning, 62, 965–994. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00715.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borsley, R. D., & Jones, B. M. (2001). The development of finiteness in Early Welsh. Journal of Celtic Language Learning, 6, 9–20.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., & Slobin, D. (1982). Rules and Schemas in the development and Use of the English past tense. Language, 58, 265–289. doi: 10.2307/414099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, S., & Hadi, A. S. (2006). Logistic Regression. In Regression Analysis by Example. doi: 10.1002/0470055464.ch12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chondrogianni, V., Davies, P., & Thomas, E. (2013). A new sentence repetition task for Welsh-speaking school aged children. Bangor: Bangor University Press.Google Scholar
Chondrogianni, V., & John, N. (2018). Tense and plural formation in Welsh-English bilingual children with and without language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 53, 495–514. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12363CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chondrogianni, V., & Marinis, T. (2011). Differential effects of internal and external factors on the development of vocabulary, tense morphology and morpho-syntax in successive bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 318–345. doi: 10.1075/lab.1.3.05choCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chondrogianni, V., & Marinis, T. (2012). Production and processing asymmetries in the acquisition of tense morphology by sequential bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 5–21. doi: 10.1017/S1366728911000368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conboy, B. T., & Thal, D. J. (2006). Ties between the lexicon and grammar: Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of bilingual toddlers. Child Development, 77, 712–735. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00899.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, D. M., Styles, B., & Sewell, J. (2009). The British Picture Vocabulary Scale III (3rd ed.). London: GL Assessment.Google Scholar
Ebbels, S. (2014). Effectiveness of intervention for grammar in school-aged children with primary language impairments: A review of the evidence. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 30, 7–40. doi: 10.1177/0265659013512321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genesee, F., & Hamayan, E. V. (1980). Individual differences in second language learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., Simon-Cereijido, G., & Wagner, C. (2008). Bilingual children with language impairment: A comparison with monolinguals and second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 3–19. doi: 10.1017/S0142716408080016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasan, A., Zhiyu, W., & Mahani, A. S. (2015). mnlogit: Multinomial logit model. R Package Version 1.2.4. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mnlogitGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., & Wexler, K. (2002). Why is ‘is’ easier than ‘-s’?: acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child second language learners of English. Second Language Research, 18, 95–136. doi: 10.1191/0267658302sr195oaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, P. F., & Schwartz, R. G. (2005). English past tense use in bilingual children with language impairment. American Journal of Speech and Language Pathology, 14, 313–323. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2005/030)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, G. (2015). Modern Welsh: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. (2014). Children with specific language impairment (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, L. B., McGregor, K. K., & Allen, G. D. (1992). Grammatical morphology and speech perception in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1076–1085. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3505.1076CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchman, V. A., Martinez-Sussmann, C., & Dale, P. S. (2004). The language-specific nature of grammatical development: Evidence from bilingual language learners. Developmental Science, 7, 212–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00340.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchman, V. A., Wulfeck, B., & Weismer, S. E. (1999). Morphological productivity in children with normal language and SLI: A study of the English past tense. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 42, 206–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marinis, T., & Armon-Lotem, S. (2015). Sentence repetition. In Armon-Lotem, S., de Jong, J., and Meir, N. (Eds.) (pp. 95–123). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Marinis, T., & Chondrogianni, V. (2010). Production of tense marking in successive bilingual children: When do they converge with their monolingual peers? International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 19–28. doi: 10.3109/17549500903434125CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masoura, E. V., & Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Phonological short-term memory and foreign language learning. International Journal of Psychology, 34(5-6), 383–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. (2005). Grammatical morphology in children learning English as a second language: Implications of similarities with specific language impairment. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 172–187. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2005/019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. (2010). The interface between bilingual development and specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 227–252. doi: 10.1017/S0142716409990373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. (2011). Individual differences in child English second language acquisition: Comparing child-internal and child-external factors. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 213–237. doi: 10.1075/lab.1.3.01parCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., & Jia, R. (2017). Bilingual children ’ s long-term outcomes in English as a second language: Language environment factors shape individual differences in catching up with monolinguals. Developmental Science, 20, e12433. doi: 10.1111/desc.12433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Jia, R., & Arppe, A. (2017). The acquisition of tense morphology over time by English second language children with specific language impairment: Testing the cumulative effects hypothesis. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 881–908. doi: 10.1017/S0142716416000485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Schneider, P., & Duncan, T. S. (2013). Discriminating children with language impairment among English-language learners from diverse first-language backgrounds. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 56, 971–981. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0050)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradis, J., Tulpar, Y., & Arppe, A. (2016). Chinese L1 children’s English L2 verb morphology over time: Individual variation in long-term outcomes. Journal of Child Language, 43, 553–580. doi: 10.1017/S0305000915000562CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2002). The past and future of past tense. Trends in cognitive sciences (Vol. 6). doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01990-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raven, J. C. (2003). Raven’s Coloured Progressive MatricesTM (CPM). London: Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Redmond, S. M., & Rice, M. L. (2001). Detection of irregular verb violations by children with and without SLI. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 655–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, M. L., & Wexler, K. (1996). Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1239–1257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, M. L., & Wexler, K. (2001). Test of early grammatical impairment. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Tuller, L. (2015). Clinical use of parental questionnaires in multilingual contexts. In Armon-Lotem, S., de Jong, J., and Meir, N. (Eds.), Assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from language impairment (pp. 301–330). London: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Lely, H. K. J., & Ullman, M. T. (2001). Past tense morphology in specifically language impaired and normally developing children. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 177–217. doi: 10.1080/01690960042000076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh Assembly Government. (2010). Welsh-medium Education Strategy. Cardiff, Wales: Author.Google Scholar
Wiig, E. H., Secord, W., & Seme, E. (2006). CELF-Preschool 2 UK. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. (2016). Residuals and regression diagnostics: Focusing on logistic regression. Annals of Translational Medicine, 4, 195. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.03.36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed