Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:30:02.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predicting risk for oral and written language learning difficulties in students educated in a second language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2013

CAROLINE ERDOS ,
FRED GENESEE ,
ROBERT SAVAGE  and
CORINNE HAIGH
CAROLINE ERDOS*
Affiliation:
Montreal Children's Hospital
FRED GENESEE
Affiliation:
McGill University
ROBERT SAVAGE
Affiliation:
McGill University
CORINNE HAIGH
Affiliation:
Bishop's University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Caroline Erdos, McGill University Health Center, Montreal Children's Hospital, Department of Speech–Language Pathology, Room A-424, 2300 Tupper, Montreal, QC H3H IP3, Canada. E-mail: caroline.erdos@muhc.mcgill.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The extent to which risk for French as a second language (L2) reading and language learning impairment are distinct and can be predicted using first language (L1) predictors was examined in English-speaking students in total French immersion programs. A total of 86 children were tested in fall of kindergarten, spring kindergarten, and spring Grade 1 using an extensive battery of L1 predictor tests (in kindergarten) and L2 outcome tests (in Grade 1). Analyses of the kindergarten predictor scores revealed distinct underlying components, one related to reading and one to oral language. Further analyses revealed that phonological awareness, phonological access, and letter-sound knowledge in L1 were significant predictors of risk for reading difficulties in L2 while performance on L1 sentence repetition, phonological awareness, and tense marking tests in kindergarten were the best predictors of risk for L1 and L2 oral language difficulties. Both fall- and spring-kindergarten predictors predicted Grade 1 outcomes to a significant extent, with the spring-kindergarten predictors being more accurate. These results provide support for distinctive risk profiles for L2 oral language and reading difficulty and, furthermore, argue that assessment of L1 abilities can be used to make reasonably accurate predictions of later reading and/or oral language learning difficulties in L2 students.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , March 2014 , pp. 371 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alloway, T. P., & Gathercole, S. E. (2005). Working memory and short-term sentence recall in young children. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 207–220.Google Scholar
Archibald, L. M. D., & Joanisse, M. F. (2009). On the sensitivity and specificity of non-word repetition and sentence recall to language and memory impairments in children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 899–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
August, D., & Shanahan, T. (Eds.). (2006). Developing literacy in second- language learners: Report of the national literacy panel on language-minority children and youth. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S. E., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105, 158–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 3, 77–85.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? Psychological Bulletin, 130, 858–888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botting, N., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2001). Non-word repetition and language development in children with language impairments. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36, 421–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bournot-Trites, M., & Denizot, I. (2005, January). Conscience phonologique en immersion française au Canada. Paper presented at the 1er Colloque International de Didactique Cognitive, Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
Bowey, J. A. (2005). Predicting individual differences in learning to read. In Snowling, M. J. & Hulme, C. (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 155–171). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 683–696.Google Scholar
Catts, H., Adlof, S. M., & Ellis Weismer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 278–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catts, H., Adlof, S., Hogan, T., & Ellis Weismer, S. (2005). Are specific language impairment and dyslexia distinct disorders? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1378–1396.Google Scholar
Catts, H. W., Gillespie, M., Leonard, L. B., Kail, R. V., & Miller, C. A. (2002). The role of speed of processing, rapid naming, and phonological awareness in reading achievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 509–524.Google Scholar
Comaskey, E. M., Savage, R. S., & Abrami, P. (2009). A randomised efficacy study of web-based synthetic and analytic programmes among disadvantaged urban kindergarten children. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 92–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comeau, L., Cormier, P., Grandmaison, E., & Lacroix, D. (1999). A longitudinal study of phonological processing skills in children learning to read in a second language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 29–43.Google Scholar
Cormier, P., Desrochers, A., & Sénéchal, M. (2006). Validation et consistance interne d'une batterie de tests pour l'évaluation multidimensionnelle de la lecture en français. Revue des sciences de l'éducation, 32, 205–225.Google Scholar
Corriveau, K., Pasquini, E., & Goswami, U. (2007). Basic auditory processing skills and specific language impairment: A new look at an old hypothesis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 647–666.Google Scholar
Dale, P., Price, T., Bishop, D., & Plomin, R. (2003). Outcomes of early language delay: I. Predicting persistent and transient language difficulties at 3 and 4 years. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 544–560.Google Scholar
Dockrell, J. E., Lindsay, G., & Palikara, O. (2011). Explaining the academic achievement at school leaving for pupils with a history of language impairment: Previous academic achievement and literacy skills. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 27, 223–237.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., Thériault-Whalen, C. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1993). Echelle de Vocabulaire en Images Peabody [Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test]. Toronto: Psycan.Google Scholar
Erdos, C., Genesee, F., Savage, R., & Haigh, C. (2011). Individual differences in second language reading outcomes. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 3–25.Google Scholar
Fraser, J., Goswami, U., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2010). Dyslexia and specific language impairment: The role of phonology and auditory processing. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 8–29.Google Scholar
Graf Estes, K., Evans, J. L., & Else-Quest, N. M. (2007). Differences in the nonword repetition performance of children with and without specific language impairment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 177–195.Google Scholar
Gutierrez-Clellen, V. F., & Simon-Cereijido, G. (2007). The discriminant accuracy of a grammatical measure with Latino English-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 968–981.Google Scholar
Gutierrez-Clellen, V. F., & Simon-Cereijido, G. (2010). Using nonword repetition tasks for the identification of language impairment in Spanish-English-speaking children: Does the language of assessment matter? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 48–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jared, D., Cormier, P., Levy, B. A., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2006, June). Becoming biliterate: A longitudinal investigation of reading growth in children in French immersion. Paper presented at the Conference of the Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island.Google Scholar
Jared, D., Cormier, P., Levy, B. A., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2011). Early predictors of biliteracy development in children in French immersion: A four-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 119–139.Google Scholar
Johnston, A. M., Barnes, M. A., & Desrochers, A. (2008). Reading comprehension: Developmental processes, individual differences, and interventions. Canadian Psychology, 49, 125–132.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401–415.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. R., & Savage, R. S. (2008). Can the simple view deal with the complexities of reading? Literacy, 42, 75–82.Google Scholar
Law, J., Boyle, J., Harris, F., Harkness, A., & Nye, C. (2000). Prevalence and natural history of primary speech and language delay: Findings from a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 35, 165–188.Google Scholar
National Institute for Literacy. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.Google Scholar
Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 443–468.Google Scholar
Paradis, J. (2010). The interface between bilingual development and specific language impairment. [Keynote article]. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 3–28.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., Crago, M., Genesee, F., & Rice, M. (2003). Bilingual children with specific language impairment: How do they compare with their monolingual peers? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 113–127.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., Genesee, F., & Crago, M. (2010). Dual language development and disorders: A handbook on bilingualism and second language learning (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Coloured Progressive Matrices–1998 edition. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Reese, L., Garnier, H., Gallimore, R., & Goldenberg, C. (2000). Longitudinal analysis of the antecedents of emergent Spanish literacy and middle-school English reading achievement of Spanish-speaking students. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 633–662.Google Scholar
Rice, M. L. (2007). Children with specific language impairment: bridging the genetic and developmental perspectives. In Hoff, E. & Shatz, M. (Eds.), Handbook of language development (pp. 411–431). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rice, M., & Wexler, K. (2001). Test of Early Grammatical Impairment. New York: Psychological Corp.Google Scholar
Riches, C., & Genesee, F. (2006). Cross-linguistic and cross-modal aspects of literacy development. In Genesee, F., Lindholm–Leary, K., Saunders, W., & Christian, D. (Eds.), Educating English language learners: A synthesis of research evidence (pp. 64–108). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Savage, R. S., & Frederickson, N. (2005). Evidence of a highly specific relationship between rapid automatic naming of digits and text-reading speed. Brain and Language, 93, 152–159.Google Scholar
Scanlon, D. M., Anderson, K. L., & Flynn, L. H. (2008, November). Preventing reading difficulties: The role of instruction and experience before first grade. Presentation for the Early Childhood Direction Center, Capital Region Board of Cooperative Educational Services, Latham, NY.Google Scholar
Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (2003). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (4th ed.). New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2005). Dyslexia (specific reading disability). Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1301–1309.Google Scholar
Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., & Estabar, M. D. (1990). Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264, 998–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, P. A., McGee, R., & Williams, S., (1985). Some characteristics of 9-year-old boys with general reading backwardness of specific reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 407–421.Google Scholar
Simon-Cereijido, G., & Gutierrez-Clellen, V. F. (2007). Spontaneous language markers of Spanish language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 317–339.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. (2006). Census of population (Catalogue No. 97-555-XCB2006015). Retrieved June 11, 2008, from http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2006 Google Scholar
Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Storch, S. A., & Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 934–947.Google Scholar
Tomblin, J. B., Records, N. L., Buckwalter, P., Zhang, X., Smith, E., & O'Brien, M. (1997). Prevalence of specific language impairment in kindergarten children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 1245–1260.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (2005). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (2nd Canadian ed.). Toronto: Pearson Canada Assessment.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). Wide Range Achievement Test (3rd ed.). Wilmington, DE: Wide Range.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., & Denckla, M. B. (2005). Rapid Automatized Naming and Rapid Alternating Stimulus Tests. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar