Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T08:31:18.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relative contribution of segments and intonation to the perception of foreign-accented speech

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2015

JOAN SERENO ,
LYNNE LAMMERS  and
ALLARD JONGMAN
JOAN SERENO*
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
LYNNE LAMMERS
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
ALLARD JONGMAN
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Joan Sereno, 425 Blake Hall, 1541 Lilac Lane, Linguistics Department, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045. E-mail: Sereno@ku.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study examines the relative impact of segments and intonation on accentedness, comprehensibility, and intelligibility, specifically investigating the separate contribution of segmental and intonational information to perceived foreign accent in Korean-accented English. Two English speakers and two Korean speakers recorded 40 English sentences. The sentences were manipulated by combining segments from one speaker with intonation (fundamental frequency contour and duration) from another speaker. Four versions of each sentence were created: one English control (English segments and English intonation), one Korean control (Korean segments and Korean intonation), and two Korean–English combinations (one with English segments and Korean intonation; the other with Korean segments and English intonation). Forty native English speakers transcribed the sentences for intelligibility and rated their comprehensibility and accentedness. The data show that segments had a significant effect on accentedness, comprehensibility, and intelligibility, but intonation only had an effect on intelligibility. Contrary to previous studies, the present study, separating segments from intonation, suggests that segmental information contributes substantially more to the perception of foreign accentedness than intonation. Native speakers seem to rely mainly on segments when determining foreign accentedness.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , March 2016 , pp. 303 - 322
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciations and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42, 529–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson-Hsieh, J., & Koehler, K. (1988). The effect of foreign accent and speaking rate on native speaker comprehension. Language Learning, 38, 561–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvaniti, A. (2012). The usefulness of metrics in the quantification of speech rhythm. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 351–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, M. E., Hirschberg, J., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2005). The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In Jun, S.-A. (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 9–54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2010). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer, Version 5.1.31 [Computer program]. Retrieved April 4, 2010, from http://www.praat.org/Google Scholar
Broselow, E., Chen, S.-I., & Wang, C. (1998). The emergence of the unmarked in second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, H., & Silverman, S. (1970). Hearing and deafness. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in favor of broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48, 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F. R., & Iverson, G. K. (1993). Sonority and markedness among onset clusters in the interlanguage of ESL learners. Second Language Research, 9, 234–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J., & Zampini, M. (2008). Phonology and second language acquisition. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fayer, J., & Krasinski, E. (1987). Native and nonnative judgments of intelligibility and irritation. Language Learning, 37, 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. (1999). Age of learning and second-language speech. In Birdsong, D. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 101–132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Birdsong, D., Bialystok, E., Mack, M., Sung, H., & Tsukada, K. (2006). Degree of foreign accent in English sentences produced by Korean children and adults. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 153–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., Bohn, O., & Jang, S. (1997). The effect of experience on nonnative subjects’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., & Hillenbrand, J. (1984). Limits on phonetic accuracy in foreign language speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 708–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., Munro, M., & MacKay, D. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125–3134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1984). The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of nonnative speech. Language Learning, 34, 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, S. (2009). Intonational and durational contributions to the perception of foreign-accented Norwegian. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Jilka, M. (2000). The contribution of intonation to the perception of foreign accent. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Jun, S.-A. (1996). The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody: Intonational phonology and prosodic structure. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Jun, S.-A. (1998). The accentual phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy. Phonology, 15, 189–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kashiwagi, A., & Snyder, M. (2010). Speech characteristics of Japanese speakers affecting American and Japanese listener evaluations. Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 10, 1–14.Google Scholar
Kim, J. S., & Kim, S.-H. (2001). Remarks on Korean speakers’ realization of English intonation: Focusing on declarative sentences. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 5, 187–207.Google Scholar
Koster, C., & Koet, T. (1993). The evaluation of accent in the English of Dutchmen. Language Learning, 43, 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. R., Mennen, I., & Schepman, A. (2000). Phonological conditioning of peak alignment in rising pitch accents in Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2685–2696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, H. B. (1999). Korean. In Handbook of the International Phonetic Association (pp. 120–123). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, H. (2013). Evidence of diachronic sound change: A comparative acoustic study of Seoul and Kyungsang Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Magen, H. (1998). The perception of foreign-accented speech. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, R. (2001). Foreign accent: The ontogeny and phylogeny of second language phonology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, R., & Faudree, M. (1996). Markedness universals and the acquisition of voicing contrasts by Korean speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulines, E., & Charpentier, F. (1990). Pitch-synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphones. Speech Communication, 9, 453–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J. (1995). Nonsegmental factors in foreign accent: Ratings of filtered speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of foreign-accented speech. Language and Speech, 38, 289–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1998). The effects of speaking rate on listener evaluations of native and foreign-accented speech. Language Learning, 48, 159–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1999). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 49, 285–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plomp, R., & Mimpen, A. M. (1979). Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. International Journal of Audiology, 18, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quené, H., & Van Delft, L. E. (2010). Non-native durational patterns decrease speech intelligibility. Speech Communication, 52, 911–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reetz, H., & Jongman, A. (2009). Phonetics: Transcription, production, acoustics, and perception. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley–Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tagliaferri, B. (2008). Paradigm: Perception research systems [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.paradigmexperiments.com/Google Scholar
Tajima, K., Port, R., & Dalby, J. (1997). Effects of temporal correction on intelligibility of foreign accented English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tark, E. (2012). An experimental study on Korean rhythm structure on the basis of rhythm metrics. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Kansas.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. (1980). Some influences on the syllable structure of interlanguage phonology. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 139–152.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. (2006). Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Els, T., & de Bot, K. (1987). The role of intonation in foreign accent. Modern Language Journal, 71, 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willems, N. (1982). English intonation from a Dutch point of view. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, S., & O’Brien, M. G. (2013). Perceived accentedness and intelligibility: The relative contributions of F0 and duration. Speech Communication, 55, 486–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar