Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:50:01.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spelling of stop consonants after /s/ by children and adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Rebecca Treiman*
Affiliation:
Wayne State University
*
Rebecca Treiman, Psychology Department, Wayne State University, 71 West Warren Avenue, Detroit MI 48202

Abstract

Two experiments examined the way in which kindergarteners, first graders, and adults spell syllables like /spa/, /sta/, and /ska/. The second consonants of these syllables are standardly spelled as the voiceless stops P, T, and C/K. From a phonetic standpoint, however, the consonants could be spelled as the voiced stops B, D, and G. The proportion of voiced spellings was found to decrease with reading level: The nonstandard spellings were fairly prevalent among children, but almost nonexistent among adults. Nonetheless, most adults could choose the phonetically plausible voiced spellings over phonetically incorrect spellings.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barton, D., Miller, R., & Macken, M.Do children treat clusters as one unit or two? Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 1980, 18, 105137.Google Scholar
Byrne, B.On teaching articulatory phonetics via an orthography. Memory and Cognition, 1984, 12, 181189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caisse, M. Pitch perturbations induced by voiceless unaspirated stops. Paper presented at the meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Miami, December 1981.Google Scholar
Catts, H. W., & Kamhi, A. G.Simplification of /s/ + stop consonant clusters: A developmental perspective. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1984, 27, 556561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, C. Approaching reading through invented spelling. In Resnick, L. B. & Weaver, P. A. (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading. Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
Dunn, O. J.Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics, 1964, 6, 241252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L. C. How orthography alters spoken language competencies in children learning to read and spell. In Downing, J. & Valtin, R. (Eds.), Language awareness and learning to read. New York: Springer Verlag, 1984.Google Scholar
Fink, R.Orthography and the perception of stops after s. Language and Speech, 1974, 17, 152159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harste, J. C., Burke, C. L., & Woodward, V. A. Children's language and world: Initial encounters with print. In Langer, J. & Smith-Burke, M. (Eds.), Bridging the gap: Reader meets author. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 1982.Google Scholar
Healy, A. F., & Levitt, A. C.Accessibility of the voicing distinction for learning phonological rules. Memory and Cognition, 1980, 8, 107114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hockett, C. F.A manual of phonology. International Journal of American Linguistics, 1955, 21, 4, Pt. 1.Google Scholar
Jaeger, J. J. The psychological reality of phonemes revisited. Report of the Phonology Laboratory No. 5. Berkeley: University of California, Department of Linguistics, 1980.Google Scholar
Jastak, J. F., Bijou, S. W., & Jastak, S.The wide range achievement test. Wilmington: Jastak Associates, 1978.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. J., Foss, D. J., & Greenberg, J. H.Phonological distinctive features as cues in learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 77, 200205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klatt, D. H.Voice onset time, frication, and aspiration in word-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1975, 18, 686706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lotz, J., Abramson, A. S., Gerstman, L. J., Ingemann, F., & Nemser, W. J.The perception of English stops by speakers of English, Spanish, Hungarian, and Thai: A tape-cutting experiment. Language and Speech, 1960, 3, 7177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nearey, T. M. The psychological reality of phonological representations: Experimental evidence. In Myers, T., Laver, J., & Anderson, J. (Eds.), The cognitive representation of speech. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1981.Google Scholar
Ohde, R. N.Fundamental frequency as an acoustic correlate of stop consonant voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1984, 75, 224230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, C.Children's categorization of speech sounds in English (NCTE Research Report No. 17). Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English, 1975.Google Scholar
Reeds, J. A., & Wang, W. S.-Y.The perception of stops after s. Phonetica, 1961, 6, 7881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawusch, J. R., & Jusczyk, P.Adaptation and contrast in the perception of voicing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981, 7, 408421.Google ScholarPubMed
Stemberger, J. P.Speech errors and theoretical phonology: A review. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1983.Google Scholar
Treiman, R. Phonemic analysis, spelling, and reading. In Carr, T. (Ed.), New directions for child development: The development of reading skills. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985a.Google Scholar
Treiman, R.Phonemic awareness and spelling: Children's judgments do not always agree with adults'. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1985b, 39, 182201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N.Principles of phonology (Baltaxe, C.A.M., Trans.). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1969. (Originally published 1939.)Google Scholar