Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:16:34.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coherence in psychotic discourse. B. T. Ribeiro. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994. Pp. 320

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Elaine Chaika
Elaine Chaika
Affiliation:
Providence College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 1996 , pp. 261 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andreasen, N. J. C. (1979a). The clinical assessment of thought, language, and communication disorders. I. Archives of General Psychiatry, 36, 1315–1321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andreasen, N. J. C. (1979b). The clinical assessment of thought, language, and communication disorders. II. Archives of General Psychiatry, 36, 1325–1330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baars, B. J. (Ed.). (1992). Experimental slips and human error: Exploring the architecture of volition. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, B. (1971). Theoretical studies toward a sociology of language: Vol. 1. Class, codes, and control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1963). The ontogeny of English phrase structure: The first phrase. Language,39, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn, J. G. (1986). Time in therapeutic relations: Myths and realities. Southern Medical Journal. 79, 344–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaika, E. (1981). How shall a discourse be understood? Discourse Processes, 4. 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaika, E. (1982a). Thought disorder or speech disorder in schizophrenia? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 8, 587–591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaika, E. (1982b). A unified explanation for the diverse structural deviations reported for adult schizophrenics with disrupted speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 15. 167–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaika, E. (1990). Understanding psychotic speech: Beyond Freud and Chomsky. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Chaika, E., & Alexander, P. (1986). The ice cream stories: A study in normal and psychotic narrations. Discourse Processes, 9, 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaika, E., & Lambe, R. (1985). The locus of dysfunction of schizophrenic speech. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 11, 8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaika, E., & Lambe, R. (1986). Is schizophrenia a semiotic disorder? A reply to Lanin-Kettering and Harrow. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 9, 305–328.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. (1966). The early symptoms of schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 112, 225–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chenail, R. J. (Ed.). (1991). Medical discourse and systemic frames of comprehension. (Advances in discourse processes, No. 42). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Crow, T. J. (1993). Origins of psychosis and the evolution of human language and communication. In Langer, S., Mendlewicz, J., & Racagni, G. (Eds.), The new generation of antipsychotic drugs: Novel mechanisms of action (International Academy for Biomedical and Drug Research No, 4, pp. 39–61). Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
Ferrara, K. (1994). Repetition as rejoinder in therapeutic discourse: Echoing and mirroring. In Johnstone, B. (Ed.), Repetition in discourse: Interdisciplinary perspectives (Advances in Discourse Processes. No. 48) (Vol. 2, pp. 66–83). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp.1–90). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
First, M. B. (Ed.). (1994). Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. In Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fourth Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Frankel, R. M. (1984). Physicians and patients in social interaction: Medical encounters as a discourse process. Discourse Processes, 7(Special Issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, C. D. (1987). The positive and negative impairments in schizophrenia reflect impairments in the perception and initiation of actions. Psychological Medicine, 17, 631–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, C. D., & Done, D. J. (1988). Towards a neuropsychology of schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 437–443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fromkin, V. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language. 47. 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, J. E. (1991). Conversation analysis of therapeutic discourse: The pursuit of a therapeutic agenda (Advances in Discourse Processes, No. 41). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hallowell, E. M., & Smith, H. F. (1983). Communication through poetry in the therapy of a schizophrenic patient. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 11, 133–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, R. (1986). Verbal hallucinations and language production processes in schizophrenia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 503–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeney, B. P. (1990). Recursive frame analysis: A method for organizing therapeutic discourse. Therapia Familiare, 33, 25–39.Google Scholar
Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Lehrer, A., & Kittay, E. F. (Eds.). (1992). Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Leudar, I., Thomas, P., & Johnston, M. (1992). Self-repair in dialogues of schizophrenics: Effects of hallucinations and negative symptoms. Brain and Language, 19, 1–25.Google Scholar
Leudar, I., Thomas, P., & Johnston, M. (1994). Self-monitoring in speech production: Effects of verbal hallucinations and negative symptoms. Psychological Medicine, 24, 749–761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKay, D. (1992). Errors, ambiguity, and awareness in language perception and production. In Baars, B. (Ed.), Experimental slips and human error: Exploring the architecture of volition (pp. 39–67). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maher, B. (1983). A tentative theory of schizophrenic utterance. In Progress in experimental personality research(Vol. 12). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Morice, R. D., & Ingram, J. C. (1982). Language analysis in schizophrenia: Diagnostic implications. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 16, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phoenix, V. G., & Lindeman, M. L. (1980). Language patterns and therapeutic change. Paper presented at the 2nd Delaware Symposium on Language Studies, University of Delaware, Newark.Google Scholar
Reason, J. (1984). Lapses of attention in everyday life. In Parasuraman, R. & Davies, D. R. (Eds.), Varieties of attention. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Rochester, S., & Martin, J. (1979). Crazy talk: A study of the discourse of schizophrenic speakers. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimkunas, A. (1978). Hemispheric asymmetry and schizophrenic thought disorder. In Schwartz, S. (Ed.), Language and cognition in schizophrenia (pp. 193–235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stillings, N., Feinstein, M., Garfield, J., Rissland, E., Rosenbaum, D., Weisler, S., & Baker-Ward, L. (1987). Cognitive science. An introduction. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Stoddard, S. (1991). Test and texture: Patterns of cohesion (Advances in Discourse Processes). Norwood, NJ: Albex.Google Scholar
Werner, O., Lewis-Matichek, G., Evans, M., & Litowitz, B. (1975). An ethnoscience view of schizophrenic speech. In Blount, B. & Sanches, M. (Eds.), Sociocultural dimensions of language use (pp. 349–380). New York: Academic.Google Scholar