Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:36:45.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between bilingualism and the development of cognitive processes in problem solving

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Ellen Bialystok  and
Shilpi Majumder
Ellen Bialystok*
Affiliation:
York University
Shilpi Majumder
Affiliation:
York University
*
Department of Psychology, York University, 4700 Keele Street, North York, Ontario, M3j 1P3, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examined the effects of differing degrees of bilingualism on the nonverbal problemsolving abilities of children in grade 3. Three linguistic groups were compared on problem-solving tasks designed to measure control of attention or analysis of knowledge, processes previously shown to develop differently in monolingual and bilingual children solving linguistic problems (Bialystok, 1988). In this study, an English-speaking monolingual group was compared with a French–English bilingual group and a Bengali-English bilingual group. All of the children in the study were similar except for their language background. Tests of language proficiency confirmed that the French-English subjects were balanced bilinguals and that the Bengali-English subjects were partial bilinguals. The balanced French–English bilinguals showed better performance on the non-linguistic tasks requiring control of attention than both the partial bilingual group and the monolingual group. There were no differences found between the groups on the non-linguistic task requiring analysis of representational structures. These results indicate that balanced bilinguals carry over their linguistic advantage in control of attention into the non-linguistic domain.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 1998 , pp. 69 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bialystok, E. (1986). Factors in the growth of linguistic awareness. Child Development, 57, 498–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1988). Levels of bilingualism and levels of linguistic awareness. Developmental Psychology, 24, 560–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1992). Attentional control in childrens metalinguistic performance and measures of field independence. Developmental Psychology, 28. 654–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1993). Metalinguistic awareness: The development of childrens representations of language. In Pratt, C. & Garton, A. (Eds.), Systems of representation in children: Development and use (pp. 211–233). London: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E.,& Codd, J. (1997). Cardinal limits: Evidence from language awareness and bilingualism for developing concepts of number. Cognitive Development, 12, 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. (1976). The influence of bilingualism on cognitive growth: A synthesis of researchfindings and explanatory hypotheses. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 9, 1–43.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1978). Bilingualism and the development of metalinguistic awareness. Journal of Cross-CulturalPsychology, 9, 131–149.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Reviewof Educational Research, 49, 222–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darcy, N. T. (1946). The effect of bilingualism upon the measurement of the intelligence of childrenof preschool age. Journal of Educational Psychology, 37, 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz, R. M. (1983). Thought and two languages: The impact of bilingualism on cognitive develop-ment. Review of Research in Education, 10, 23–54.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M.,& Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Galambos, S. J.,& Goldin-Meadow, S. (1990). The effects of learning two languages on levels ofmetalinguistic awareness. Cognition, 34, 1–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galambos, S. J., Hakuta, K. (1988). Subject-specific and task-specific characteristics of metalinguistic awareness in bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, K. (1986). Mirror of language. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hakuta, K. (1987). Degree of bilingualism and cognitive ability in mainland Puerto Rican children. Child Development, 58. 1372–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, K., & Diaz, R. (1985). The relationship between degree of bilingualism and cognitiveability: A critical discussion and some new longitudinal data. In Nelson, K. E. (Ed.), Chil-dren's language (Vol. 5, pp. 319–344). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Herman, J. (1996). Crenouille, where are you? Cross-linguistic transfer among bilingual kindergartners learning to read. Unpublished Ed.D. dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kessler, C., & Quinn, M. E. (1980). Positive effects of bilingualism on science problem-solvingabilities. In Alatis, J. E. (Ed.), Georgetown University round table on languages and linguis-tics 1980: Current issues in bilingual education (pp. 295–308). Washington, DC: George-town University Press.Google Scholar
Mestre, J. P. (1988). The role of language comprehension in mathematics and problem solving. In Cocking, R. R. & Mestre, J. P. (Eds.). Linguistic and cultural influences on learning mathe-matics (pp. 201–220). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Morales, R. V., Shute, V. J., & Pellegrino, J. W. (1985). Developmental differences in understandingand solving simple mathematics word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noelting, G. (1980a). The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept: Part I-Differentiation of stages. Educational Studies in Mathematics, II, 217–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noelting, G. (1980b). The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept: Part II-Problem-structure at successive stages: Problem-solving strategies and the mechanism of adaptiverestructuring. Educational Studies in Mathematics, II, 331–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J. (1969). Water Level Test. York University, Toronto.Google Scholar
Peal, E., & Lambert, W. (1962). The relation of bilingualism to intelligence. Psychological Mono-graphs, 73, 1–23.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1929). The childs conception of the world. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Piaget, J., Inhelder, B. (1956). The childs conception of space. London: Routledge KeganPaul.Google Scholar
Ricciardelli, L. (1993). Two components of metalinguistic awareness: Control of linguistic process-ing and analysis of linguistic knowledge. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblum, T., & Pinker, S. A. (1983). Word magic revisited: Monolingual and bilingual childrensunderstanding of the word-object relationship. Child Development, 54, 773–780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saxe, G. B. (1988). Linking language with mathematics achievement: Problems and prospects. In Cocking, R. R.Mestre, J. P. (Eds.), Linguistic and cultural influences on learning mathe-matics (pp. 47–62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Secada, W. G. (1991). Degree of bilingualism and arithmetic problem solving in Hispanic firstgraders. Elementary School Journal, 92, 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Revised New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Yelland, G. W., Pollard, J., & Mercuri, A. (1993). The metalinguistic benefits of limited contactwith a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 423–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar