Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T10:03:38.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In a dark wood: dwelling as spatial practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Andrew Ballantyne
Andrew Ballantyne
Affiliation:
School of Architecture, Planning and LandscapeClaremont TowerUniversity of NewcastleNewcastle upon Tyne NE17RUUnited Kingdom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In architecture the link between life and art can be so strong that one can see them as fused, as Heidegger did. We encounter buildings in connection with the life that inhabits them, but the relationship between building and life is not that of cause and effect. The building is a tool, for which a variety of uses might be found. Gilles Deleuze saw ideas as tools, and valued ‘nomadism’ – moving between sets of ideas. He deployed a rhetoric of mobility and invention that encourages the free play of ideas, while effectively resisting the lure of Heideggerís ‘blood and soil’ nostalgia.

Type
Theory
Information
arq: Architectural Research Quarterly , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 2000 , pp. 349 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, T. (1964). Jargon der Eigentlichkeit: Zur Deutschen Ideologie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt. Translated by K. Tarnowski and F. Will (1973), The Jargon of Authenticity, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Ashfield, A. and de Bolla, P. (1996). The Sublime: a Reader in British Eighteenth-Century Aesthetic Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
Barren, S. (ed.) (1991). Degenerate Art: The fate of the Avant-Garde in Nazi Germany, Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Burke, E. (1757). A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, London.Google Scholar
Canetti, E. (1976). ‘Hitler, according to Speer’, in Das Gewissen der Worte, Carl Hanser, Munich, trans. J. Neugroschel (1986), The Conscience of Words, Seabury Press/AndrÈ Deutsch, London.Google Scholar
Certeau, M. de (1980). ‘Spatial Stories’, in L'Invention du quotidien, vol. 1, Arts de faire, Union GÈnÈral des Editions, Paris, translated by S. Rendall, (1984), The Practice of Everyday Life, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Cook, J. W. and Klotz, H. (1973). Conversations with Architects, Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1962). Nietzsche et la philosophie, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, translated by H. Tomlinson (1983), Nietzsche and Philosophy, Athlone, London.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1972). In conversation with Michel Foucault, published in L'Arc 49 (Deleuze), pp.3–10; translated by Bouchard, D. F., in Foucault, M. (1977), Language, Counter-Memory, Practice, Cornell University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1972). L'Anti-Oedipe, Minuit, Paris, translated by R. Hurley, M. Seem and H. R. Lane, (1977), Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Viking, New York.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1991). Qu'est-ce que la philosophie?, Minuit, Paris, translated by H. Tomlinson and G. Burchill (1994), What is Philosophy?, Verso, London.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. (1995). The Baumgarten Corruption: From Sense to Nonsense in Art and Philosophy, Pluto, London.Google Scholar
Dovey, K. (1999). Framing Places: Mediating Power in Built Form, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Farias, V. (1987). Heidegger et le Nazisme, Verdier, Paris. Translated by P. Burrell, D. di Benardi and G. Ricci (1989), Heidegger and Nazism, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Ghirardo, D. (1984). ‘The Architecture of Deceit’, in Perspecta: The Yale Architectural Journal, 21, pp. 110–115; and collected in Nesbit, K. (ed.) (1996), Theorizing a New Agenda for Architecture, Princeton Architectural Press, pp. 384–391.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1926). Sein mid Zeit (Tübingen: Max Niemeyer), trans. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson, Being and Time (1962), Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1950). Der Ursprung des Kunstwerkes, Klosterman, Frankfurt translated by A. Hofstadter (1971), as ‘The Origin of the Work of Art’, in Poetry, Language, Thought, Harper and Row, New York, pp. 15–87. The same translation is also collected in Heidegger, Basic Writings, op. cit. The ideas were in place earlier than the initial date of publication however – Heidegger tells us that the first version was a lecture given at Freiburg in 1935, repeated at Zürich in 1936. See Heidegger, Poetry, Language, Thought, p. xxiii.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1954). ‘Bauen Wohnen Denken’, in Vorträge und Aufsätze (Pfullingen: Neske). Translated by A. Hofstadter (1971), ‘Building, Dwelling, Thinking’, in Poetry, Language, Thought, Harper and Row, New York, pp. 143–61; p. 161. Page references in the text refer to this edition. The same translation is also in M. Heidegger, Basic Writings, ed. D. F. Krell (1993), Routledge, London, pp.347–63; and in N. Leach (ed.), Rethinking Architecture: A Reader in Cultural Theory, Routledge, London, pp. 100–109.Google Scholar
James, W. (1907). ‘What pragmatism means’, in (1995) Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Kauffmann, F. A. (1941). Die Neue Deutsche Malerei in series Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Informationsstelle, Das Deutschland der Gegenwart, 11, (Berlin: 1941). Translated by L. Becker, ‘Aspects of Art of the Third Reich’, in The Romantic Spirit in German Art 1790–1990, edited by K. Hartley, H. M. Hughes, P.-K. Schuster and W. Vaughan. (1994), Hayward Gallery, London.Google Scholar
Langer, S. (1953). Form and Feeling, Scribner, New York.Google Scholar
Last, N. (1998). ‘Transgressions and Inhabitations: Wittgensteinian Spatial Practices between Architecture and Philosophy’, in Assemblage 35, pp. 36–47.Google Scholar
Leach, N. (1998). The Dark Side of the Domus’, in The Journal of Architecture, vol. 3, no.1, pp. 31–42.Google Scholar
Leach, N. (2000). ‘Forget Heidegger’, in Scroope 12, pp. 50–59.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J.-F. (1988). ‘Domus and the Megalopolis’, in L'Inhumain: causeries sur le temps (Paris: GalilÈe), trans. G. Bennington and R. Bowlby (1991), The Inhuman: Reflections on Time, Polity, Oxford, pp. 191–204.Google Scholar
Monk, R. (1991). Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius, Vintage, London.Google Scholar
Nehemas, A. (1998). The Art of Living: Socratic Reflections from Plato to Foucault, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1889). Götzen-Dämmerung, oder: Wie man mit dem Hammer philosophiert, Naumann, Leipzig, translated by R. J. Hollingdale (1968), Twilight of the Idols, or: How to Philosophize with a Hammer, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1901). Der Wille zur Macht: Versuch einer Umwerthung aller Werthe, Naumann, Leipzig, translated by W. Kaufman and R. J. Hollingdale (1968), The Will To Power: Attempt at a Revaluation of All Values, Vintage, New York.Google Scholar
Norberg-Schulz, C. (1979). Genius loci – paesaggio, ambiente, architettura, Electa, Milan. English translation (1980), Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture, Rizzoli, New York.Google Scholar
Ott, H. (1994). Translated by Blunden, Allan, Martin Heidegger: A Political Life, Harper Collins, London.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1992). ‘Was Wittgenstein a Pragmatist?’, in Il Pragmatismo: Una Questione Aperta, Laterza & Figli, Roma-Bari. English version (1995), Pragmatism: An Open Question, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1991). ‘Heidegger, Contingency and Pragmatism’, in Essays on Heidegger and Others, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and Social Hope, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Rykwert, J. (1996). The Dancing Column: On Order in Architecture, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Safranski, R. (1994). Ein Meister aus Deutschland: Heidegger und seine Zeit (München: C. Hanser). Translated by E. Osers (1994), Martin Heidegger: Between Good and Evil, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Schultze, F. (1994). Philip Johnson, Life and Work, Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
Sereny, G. (1995). Albert Speer: His Battle with Truth, Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
Ward, J. F. (1995). Heidegger's Political Thinking, University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst.Google Scholar
Watkin, D. (1977). Morality and Architecture, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wigley, M. (1992). ‘Heidegger's House: The Violence of the Domestic’, in D: Columbia Documents in Architecture and Theory, pp. 91–121.Google Scholar
Wijdeveld, P. (1994). Ludwig Wittgenstein, Architect, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. St. J. (1992). Architectural Reflections: Studies in the Philosophy and Practice of Architecture, Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F., Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Wolin, R., editor (1993). The Heidegger Controversy, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar