Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T12:44:19.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constitutionalizing Trans-Border Nationhood: From Latin American Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2020

Hee-Moon JO
Hee-Moon JO*
Affiliation:
Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relationship between state and absent citizens is becoming more important since the globalization of the 1990s. Countries usually try to increase the number of their citizens through two methods. The first is by increasing the number of nationals living abroad using a dual-nationality system. The second is by expanding national power through dual culturalism. These methods increase the international capacity of the home state through the expansion of the de facto state territory from the perspective of network-power theory. Latin American countries have been relatively passive in this diaspora-engagement policy, but recently they have begun to show an active attitude by revising their migration policy—amendments to the Constitution and migration law, dual nationality, dual culturalism, voting rights abroad, and upgrading the status of diaspora agencies, etc. However, it is still unclear how the multinational and multi-ethnic Latin American countries conceptualize diaspora. This paper analyzes the diaspora-engagement policy of Latin American countries from the standpoint of network-power theory and tries to find out what its theoretical framework is. This paper concludes that the theorization work on diaspora should continue to track and analyze these policy changes, since it is difficult to understand what the diaspora concept is and what policy objectives the state is pursuing under the current diaspora-engagement policy.

Keywords

migration lawconstitutionalizationnetwork-power theorydiaspora-engagement policyArgentinaBrazilChileColombiaMexico
Type
The Decoupling of the Nation and the State
Information
Asian Journal of Law and Society , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 61 - 84
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press and KoGuan Law School, Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Professor of Law at Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, South Korea, where he teaches International Law and Latin American Law. He is also Director of Center for International and Regional Law. The author thanks professor Marguerite Kim for her careful reading of the manuscript and remarks. This work was supported by Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund. Correspondence to Jo Hee-Moon,. E-mail address: hmoon@hufs.ac.kr.

References

REFERENCES

Adamson, Fiona B. (2006) “Crossing Borders: International Migration and National Security.” 31 International Security 165–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamson, Fiona B. (2019) “Sending States and the Making of Intra-Diasporic Politics: Turkey and Its Diaspora(s).” 53 International Migration Review 210–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Ulrich (2008) “Mobility and the Cosmopolitan Perspective,” in Canzler, W., Kaufmann, V., & Kesselring, S., eds., Tracing Mobilities towards a Cosmopolitan Perspective, New York: Routledge, 25–36.Google Scholar
Boyle, Mark, & Kitchin, Rob (2014) “Diaspora-Centered Development: Current Practice, Critical Commentaries, and Research Priorities,” in Sahoo, S. & Pattanaik, B. K., eds., Global Diasporas and Development: Socioeconomic, Cultural, and Policy Perspectives, New Delhi: Springer, 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers (2010) “Migration, Membership, and the Modern Nation-State: Internal and External Dimensions of the Politics of Belonging.” 41 Journal of Interdisciplinary History 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brum, Alex Guedes (2018) “As Políticas de Vinculação do Brasil para os Brasileiros e seus Descendentes no Exterior.” 41 O Social em Questão 65–86.Google Scholar
De Haas, Hein (2010) “Migration and Development: A Theoretical Perspective.” 44 The International Migration Review 227–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Villiers, Bertus (2014) “The Protection of Dispersed Minorities: Options for Aboriginal People in Australia.” 74 ZaöRV 105–40.Google Scholar
Délano, Alexandra (2011) Mexico and Its Diaspora in the United States: Policies of Emigration since 1848, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delbruck, Jost (1994) “Global Migration—Immigration—Multiethnicity: Challenges to the Concept of the Nation-State.” 2 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 45–64.Google Scholar
Dowty, Alan (1989) Closed Borders: The Contemporary Assault on Freedom of Movement, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Grewal, David S. (2008) Network Power: The Social Dynamics of Globalization, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
IOM (2018) “The World Migration Report 2018,” International Organization for Migration, https://www.iom.int/sites/default/files/country/docs/china/r5_world_migration_report_2018_en.pdf (accessed 8 October 2019).Google Scholar
Kang, Guang-mun, Lee, Chul-woo, & Jo, Hee-moon (2018) “A Study on the Constitutional Provisions Related to Overseas Diaspora in OECD Member Countries,” Survey Report, Overseas Koreans Foundation, http://research.korean.net/Search/Detail/30527 (accessed 8 October 2019) (in Korean).Google Scholar
Kim, Hyung M. (2010) “Comparing Measures of National Power.” 31 International Political Science Review 405–27.Google Scholar
Lee, Chulwoo (2010) “South Korea: The Transformation of Citizenship and the State-Nation Nexus.” 40 Journal of Contemporary Asia 230–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukas, Keller, et al. (2018) “Remittances to Latin America and the Caribbean in 2017: Greater Growth Dynamism,” Inter-American Development Bank –https://www.cemla.org/PDF/remesaseinclusion/2018–06-Remittances-LAC-2017.pdf (accessed).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margheritis, Ana (2017) “Argentinos en el Exterior: Desafios Actuales de su Inclusion Politica en el Pais de Origen.” 76 America Latina Hoy 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paarlberg, Michael A. (2017) “Transnational Militancy: Diaspora Influence over Electoral Activity in Latin America.” 49 Comparative Politics 541–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedroza, Luicy, & Palop-García, Pau (2017) “Diaspora Policies in Comparison: An Application of the Emigrant Policies Index (EMIX) for the Latin American and Caribbean Region.” 60 Political Geography 165–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanabria, María Teresa Palacios (2012) “El Sistema Colombiano de Migraciones a la Luz del Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos: La Ley 1465 de 2011 y sus Antecedentes Normativos.” 21 Opinión Jurídica 83–102.Google Scholar
Shain, Yossi (2007) Kinship and Diasporas in International Affairs, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltész, Béla (2016) “Migration and Diaspora Policy Institutions in Latin America.” 59 Demographia 49–81.Google Scholar
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN, DESA), Population Division (2017) Trends in International Migrant Stock: The 2017 Revision, United Nations database, POP/DB/MIG/Stock/Rev.2017.Google Scholar
White, Anne, & Grabowska, Izabela (2018) “Literature Review and Theory: The Impact of Migration on Sending Countries, with Particular Reference to Central and Eastern Europe,” in White, A., Grabowska, I., Kaczmarczyk, P., & Slany, K., eds., The Impact of Migration on Poland, London: University College London Press, 42–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilets, James D. (1999) “The Demise of the Nation-State: Towards a New Theory of the State under International Law.” 17 Berkeley Journal of International Law 193–229.Google Scholar