Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:54:34.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fair Pricing of Life Insurance Participating Policies with a Minimum Interest Rate Guaranteed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

Anna Rita Bacinello
Anna Rita Bacinello*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Matematica Applicata alle Scienze Economiche Statistiche ed Attuariali “Bruno de Finetti”, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
*
Dipartimento di Matematica Applicata alle Scienze Economiche, Statistiche ed Attuariali “Bruno de Finetti”, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Piazzale Europa, 1, I-34127 Trieste, Italia, E-mail: bacinel@univ.trieste.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper we analyse, in a contingent-claims framework, one of the most common life insurance policies sold in Italy during the last two decades. The policy, of the endowment type, is initially priced as a standard one, given a mortality table and a technical interest rate. Subsequently, at the end of each policy year, the insurance company grants a bonus, which is credited to the mathematical reserve and depends on the performance of a special investment portfolio. More precisely, this bonus is determined in such a way that the total interest rate credited to the insured equals a given percentage (participation level) of the annual return on the reference portfolio and anyway does not fall below the technical rate (minimum interest rate guaranteed, henceforth). Moreover, if the contract is paid by periodical premiums, it is usually stated that the annual premium is adjusted at the same rate of the bonus, and thus the benefit is also adjusted in the same measure. In such policy the variables controlled by the insurance company (control-variables, henceforth) are the technical rate, the participation level and, in some sense, the riskiness of the reference portfolio measured by its volatility. However, as it is intuitive, not all sets of values for these variables give rise to a fair contract, i.e. to a contract priced consistently with the usual assumptions on financial markets and, in particular, with no-arbitrage. We derive then necessary and sufficient conditions under which each control-variable is determined by a fair pricing of the contract, given the remaining two ones.

Keywords

Policies with profitsMinimum guaranteeFair pricingBlack and Scholes framework
Type
Articles
Information
ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , November 2001 , pp. 275 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © International Actuarial Association 2001

References

Bacinello, A.R. (2000). Fair Pricing of Life Insurance Participating Policies with a Minimum Interest Rate Guaranteed. Proceedings of the Tenth AFIR International Colloquium, Tromsø, 1–28.Google Scholar
Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973). The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. Journal of Political Economy 81, 637–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blazenko, G.W., Boyle, P.P. and Newport, K.E. (1990). Valuation of Tandem Options. Advances in Futures and Options Research, vol. 4, JAI Press Inc., 39–49.Google Scholar
Boyle, P.P. and Schwartz, E.S. (1977). Equilibrium Prices of Guarantees under Equity-Linked Contracts. Journal of Risk and Insurance 44, 639–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M.J. and Schwartz, E.S. (1976). The Pricing of Equity-Linked Life Insurance Policies with an Asset Value Guarantee. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M.J. and Schwartz, E.S. (1979a). Alternative Investment Strategies for the Issuers of Equity Linked Life Insurance Policies with an Asset Value Guarantee. Journal of Business 52, 63–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M.J. and Schwartz, E.S. (1979b). Pricing and Investment Strategies for Equity-Linked Life Insurance. The S.S. Huebner Foundation for Insurance Education, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Briys, E. and de Varenne, F. (1997). On the Risk of Life Insurance Liabilities: Debunking Some Common Pitfalls. Journal of Risk and Insurance 64, 673–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosen, A. and Jorgensen, P.L. (2000). Fair Valuation of Life Insurance Liabilities: The Impact of Interest Rate Guarantees, Surrender Options, and Bonus Policies. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 26, 37–57.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. and Miltersen, K.R. (2000). Minimum Rate of Return Guarantees: The Danish Case. Proceedings of the Tenth AFIR International Colloquium, Tromsø, 309–329.Google Scholar
Harrison, M.J. and Kreps, D. (1979). Martingales and Arbitrage in Multiperiod Securities Markets. Journal of Economic Theory 20, 381–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, M.J. and Pliska, S. (1981). Martingales and Stochastic Integrals in the Theory of Continuous Trading. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 11, 215–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, M.J. and Pliska, S. (1983). A Stochastic Calculus Model of Continuous Trading: Complete Markets. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 15, 313–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, B., Jørgensen, P.L., and Grosen, A. (2000). A Finite Difference Approach to the Valuation of Path Dependent Life Insurance Liabilities. Proceedings of the Tenth AFIR International Colloquium, Tromsø, 279–307.Google Scholar
Lindset, S. (2000). Hedging Strategies for Rate of Return Guarantees on Multi-period Assets. Proceedings of the Tenth AFIR International Colloquium, Tromsø, 447–467.Google Scholar
Miltersen, K.R. and Persson, S.-A. (2000a). Guaranteed Investment Contracts: Distributed and Undistributed Excess Returns. Working Paper 2000/1, Department of Finance and Management Science, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration.Google Scholar
Miltersen, K.R. and Persson, S.-A. (2000b). A Note on Interest Rate Guarantees and Bonus: The Norwegian Case. Proceedings of the Tenth AFIR International Colloquium, Tromsø, 507–516.Google Scholar
Pentikäinen, T. (1968). Linking Life and Private Pension Insurance to Price Index. Transactions of the 18th International Congress of Actuaries, München, vol. 2, 847–859.Google Scholar
Vasicek, O. (1977). An Equilibrium Characterization of the Term Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 5, 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkie, A.D. (1987). An Option Pricing Approach to Bonus Policy. Journal of the institute of Actuaries 114, 21–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar