Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:24:42.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Canadian Preservice Teacher Views of Inclusive Physical Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2018

Brent Bradford*
Affiliation:
Concordia University of Edmonton, Canada
Tim Loreman
Affiliation:
Concordia University of Edmonton, Canada
*
Correspondence: Brent Bradford, Concordia University of Edmonton, 7128 Ada Boulevard, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T5B 4E4. Email: brent.bradford@concordia.ab.ca

Abstract

In this paper, we explored various aspects of Canadian preservice elementary school teacher views about inclusive physical education. Based on prior work by Loreman (2014) that broadly examined preservice teacher views on inclusive education, in this study we looked specifically at inclusive physical education using a different sample of participants in the same program. Preservice teachers were asked a series of open-ended questions relating to their understandings, feelings of teaching self-efficacy, attitudes, and concerns relating to inclusive physical education in elementary school. Their responses reflected a strong focus on ability diversity (e.g., disability) and indicated that inclusive physical education means that all students should be part of the learning environment or that some should be excluded in roughly equal proportion. Depending on the curricular dimension, their self-perceived levels of preparedness ranged from low to high. The participants also presented a strong case for the necessity of resources available for the teaching of inclusive physical education.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*This manuscript was accepted under the Editorship of Umesh Sharma.

References

Alberta Centre for Injury Control & Research (ACICR). (2013). Safety guidelines for physical activity in Alberta schools 2013. Retrieved from https://education.alberta.ca/media/160206/sg_pa_final_2014.pdfGoogle Scholar
Alberta Education. (2018). Physical education program of studies. Retrieved from https://education.alberta.ca/physical-education/program-of-studies/everyone/programs-of-study/Google Scholar
Alberta Learning. (2000). Physical education program of studies. Alberta, Canada: Alberta Learning.Google Scholar
Avramidis, E., Bayliss, P., & Burden, R. (2000). Student teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 277293. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00062-1Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Constantinides, P., Montalvo, R., & Silverman, S. (2013). Teaching processes in elementary physical education classes taught by specialists and nonspecialists. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 6876. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.004Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S. (1995). Strategies for interpreting qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Fishburne, G. J. (2005). Developmentally appropriate physical education for children and youth. Alberta, Canada: Ripon.Google Scholar
Gleddie, D., Hickson, C., & Bradford, B. (2018). Physical education for elementary school teachers: Foundations of a physical literacy journey. Victoria, Canada: Ripon.Google Scholar
Griggs, G., & Medcalf, R. (2015). Inclusive pedagogy in physical education. In Forlin, C. (Series Ed.), International Perspectives on Inclusive Education: Vol. 7. Inclusive pedagogy across the curriculum (119137). Bingley, UK: Emerald. doi:10.1108/S1479-363620150000007013Google Scholar
Hand, K. E. (2014). Building confident teachers: Preservice physical education teachers’ efficacy beliefs. Journal of Case Studies in Education, 6, 19.Google Scholar
Hickson, C. N., & Fishburne, G. J. (2005). Teacher development: Enhancing effective teaching in elementary school physical education [Abstract]. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76 (Suppl. 1), A77.Google Scholar
Jenkinson, K. A., & Benson, A. C. (2010). Barriers to providing physical education and physical activity in Victorian state secondary schools. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35 (8), 117. doi:10.14221/ajte.2010v35n8.1Google Scholar
Loreman, T. (2009). Straight talk about inclusive education. The CASS Connection, Spring, 4347.Google Scholar
Loreman, T. (2014). Canadian pre-service teachers and exclusion: Views and origins. In Jones, P. (Ed.), Bringing insider perspectives into inclusive teacher learning: Potentials and challenges for educational professionals (pp. 7083). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Loreman, T. (2016, January). The bumpy road from inclusive education policy to practice: Rhetoric versus reality. Paper presented at the International Conference on Inclusive Education 2016, Pune University, Pune, India.Google Scholar
Loreman, T., Forlin, C., Chambers, D., Sharma, U., & Deppeler, J. (2014). Conceptualising and measuring inclusive education. In Forlin, C. (Series Ed.), International Perspectives on Inclusive Education: Vol. 3. Measuring inclusive education (pp. 318). Bingley, UK: Emerald. doi:10.1108/S1479-363620140000003015Google Scholar
Lu, C., & De Lisio, A. (2009). Specifics for generalists: Teaching elementary physical education. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1, 170187.Google Scholar
Macmillan, R., & Meyer, M. J. (2006). Inclusion and guilt: The emotional fallout for teachers. Exceptionality Education Canada, 16 (1), 2543.Google Scholar
MacPhail, A., Tannehill, D., & Goc Karp, G. (2013). Preparing physical education preservice teachers to design instructionally aligned lessons through constructivist pedagogical practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 100112. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.008Google Scholar
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Mittler, P. (2013). Overcoming exclusion: Social justice through education. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morgan, P. J., & Hansen, V. (2008). Classroom teachers’ perceptions of the impact of barriers to teaching physical education on the quality of physical education programs. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 506516. doi:10.1080/02701367.2008.10599517Google Scholar
Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society, 28, 10241026. doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.818773Google Scholar
Placek, J. H. (1983). Conceptions of success in teaching: Busy, happy, and good? In Templin, T. J. & Olson, J. K. (Eds.), Teaching in physical education (pp. 4556). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Saldaña, J. (2011). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Shaddock, A., MacDonald, N., Hook, J., Giorcelli, L., & Arthur-Kelly, M. (2009). Disability, diversity and tides that lift all boats: Review of special education in the ACT. Chiswick, Australia: Services Initiatives.Google Scholar
Slee, R. (2011). The irregular school: Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Slee, R., & Allan, J. (2001). Excluding the included: A reconsideration of inclusive education. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 11, 173192. doi:10.1080/09620210100200073Google Scholar
Treder, D. W., Morse, W. C., & Ferron, J. M. (2000). The relationship between teacher effectiveness and teacher attitudes toward issues related to inclusion. Teacher Education and Special Education, 23, 202210. doi:10.1177/088840640002300303Google Scholar
Whitehead, M. (2007). Physical literacy: Philosophical considerations in relation to developing a sense of self, universality and propositional knowledge. Sports, Ethics and Philosophy, 1, 281298. doi:10.1080/17511320701676916Google Scholar
Whitehead, M. (Ed.). (2010). Physical literacy: Throughout the lifecourse. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar