Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T18:13:26.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving Educational Planning for Students With Severe Disabilities: An Evaluation of School-Based Professional Learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2015

Jennifer Stephenson  and
Mark Carter
Jennifer Stephenson*
Affiliation:
Macquarie University Special Education Centre, Macquarie University, Australia
Mark Carter
Affiliation:
Macquarie University Special Education Centre, Macquarie University, Australia
*
Correspondence: Jennifer Stephenson, Macquarie University Special Education Centre, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia. Email: jennifer.stephenson@mq.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The components of quality educational planning for students with moderate and severe intellectual disability are well established, but schools and special educators may not always achieve a desirable standard. This article reports on the change in quality of documentation related to individual planning and programming over a span of 4 years in a special school enrolling high-school-aged students with moderate to severe intellectual disability. The school implemented a program of professional learning, led by school staff, directed at improving planning and programming. There were significant changes in the quality of short-term goals and documentation of teaching programs. There was an increase in the quality of long-term goals but this did not reach significance. Instructional objectives were introduced in the final year of the study, and were not part of previous documentation. There was no evidence of implementation of formal monitoring procedures over the time span of the study. The difficulties observed and the changes as a result of the professional learning reflect those reported elsewhere in the literature, and demonstrate that a school commitment to improving program quality can have positive results.

Keywords

special education teachersindividual education programsinservice teacher educationsevere intellectual disability
Type
Original Articles
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , July 2015 , pp. 2 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baine, D. (2003). Guide to best practices: Developing and evaluating special needs programs (3rd ed.). Edmonton, Canada: Vector International.Google Scholar
Bateman, B. D. (2011). Individual education programs for children with disabilities. In Kauffman, J. M. & Hallahan, D. P. (Eds.), Handbook of special education (pp. 91–106). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Billingsley, F. F. (1984). Where are the generalized outcomes? (An examination of instructional objectives). Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9, 186–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boavida, T., Aguiar, C., McWilliam, R. A., & Pimentel, J. S. (2010). Quality of individualized education program goals of preschoolers with disabilities. Infants & Young Children, 23, 233–243. doi:10.1097/IYC.0b013e3181e45925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., & Jimenez, B. (2011). In Browder, D. M. & Spooner, F. (Eds.), Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities (pp. 42–91). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Browder, D. M., & Spooner, F. (2011). Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Bruce, S. M. (2011). Severe and multiple disabilities. In Kauffman, J. M. & Hallahan, D. P. (Eds.), Handbook of special education (pp. 291–303). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carter, M., Stephenson, J., & Strnadová, I. (2011). Reported prevalence by Australian special educators of evidence-based instructional practices. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 35, 47–60. doi:10.1375/ajse.35.1.47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, S. E., Carter, M., Clayton, M., & Hook, J. (1998). Education of students with high support needs: Teachers' perceptions of possible best practices, reported implementation and training needs. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 22, 76–95. doi:10.1080/1030011980220203Google Scholar
Christle, C. A., & Yell, M. L. (2010). Individualized education programs: Legal requirements and research findings. Exceptionality, 18, 109–123. doi:10.1080/09362835.2010.491740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Codding, R. S., Skowron, J., & Pace, G. M., (2005). Back to basics: Training teachers to interpret curriculum-based measurement data and create observable and measurable objectives. Behavioral Interventions, 20, 165–176. doi:10.1002/bin.194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, B. G., & Odom, S. L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79, 135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DePaepe, P., Reichle, J., Doss, S., Shriner, C. L., & Cameron, J. (1994). A preliminary evaluation of written individualized habilitation objectives and their correspondence with direct implementation. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drasgow, E., Wolery, M., Halle, J., & Hajiaghamohseni, Z. (2011). Systematic instruction of students with severe disabilities. In Kauffman, J. M. & Hallahan, D. P. (Eds.), Handbook of special education (pp. 516–531). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Drasgow, E., Yell, M. L., & Robinson, T. R. (2001). Developing legally correct and educationally appropriate IEPs. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 359–373. doi:10.1177/074193250102200606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etscheidt, S. K. (2006). Progress monitoring: Legal issues and recommendations for IEP teams. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38 (3), 56–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fixsen, D. L., Blase, K. A., Naoom, S. F., & Wallace, F. (2009). Core implementation components. Research on Social Work Practice, 19, 531–540. doi:10.1177/1049731509335549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foreman, P. (2009). Education of students with an intellectual disability: Research and practice. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
Foreman, P., Arthur-Kelly, M., & Pascoe, S. (2007). The impact of partner training on the communicative involvement of students with multiple and severe disability in special schools. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 32, 233–247. doi:10.1080/13668250701654417CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gersten, R., & Dimino, J. (2001). The realities of translating research into classroom practice. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 120–130. doi:10.1111/0938-8982.00013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gersten, R., Vaughn, S., Deshler, D., & Schiller, E. (1997). What we know about using research findings: Implications for improving special education practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 466–476. doi:10.1177/002221949703000501CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lignugaris/Kraft, B., Marchand-Martella, N., & Martella, R. C. (2001). Strategies for writing better goals and short-term objectives or benchmarks. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34 (1), 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, E. C., & Beare, P. L. (1990). The quality of IEP objectives and their relevance to instruction for students with mental retardation and behavioral disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 11, 48–55. doi:10.1177/074193259001100207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pretti-Frontczak, K., & Bricker, D. (2000). Enhancing the quality of individualized education plan (IEP) goals and objectives. Journal of Early Intervention, 23, 92–105. doi:10.1177/105381510002300204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruble, L. A., McGrew, J., Dalrymple, N., & Jung, L. A. (2010). Examining the quality of IEPs for young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Other Developmental Disorders, 40, 1459–1470. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-1003-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shriner, J. G., Carty, S. J., Rose, C. A., Shogren, K. A., Kim, M., & Trach, J. S. (2013). Effects of using a web-based individualized education program decision-making tutorial. Journal of Special Education, 47, 175–185. doi:10.1177/0022466912453940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigafoos, J., Elkins, J., Couzens, D., Gunn, S., Roberts, D., & Kerr, M. (1993). Analysis of IEP goals and classroom activities for children with multiple disabilities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 8, 99–105. doi:10.1080/0885625930080202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigafoos, J., Kigner, J., Holt, K., Doss, S., & Mustonen, T. (1991). Improving the quality of written developmental policies for adults with intellectual disabilities. The British Journal of Mental Subnormality, 37, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, M. E., & Brown, F. (2000). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Stephenson, J., & Carter, M. (2005). Student teachers’ perceptions of best practice in practicum with learners who have high support needs. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 29, 60–83. doi:10.1080/1030011050290105Google Scholar
Westling, D. L., & Fox, L. (2009). Teaching students with severe disabilities (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar