Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:17:53.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpretations of sustainability beyond the middle class

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2019

Kim Beasy Open the ORCID record for Kim Beasy [Opens in a new window]
Kim Beasy*
Affiliation:
School of Education, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia
*
Corresponding author. Email: Kim.Beasy@utas.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Critical discourses of sustainability challenge modern rhetoric of economic growth and challenge current modes of social development. Yet sustainability discourses are shaped predominantly by the perspectives and interests of middle-class, tertiary-educated urban policy makers or environmentalists, and have insufficiently engaged people beyond these cohorts, even in the advanced capitalist societies where they have originated. This article shares findings from a study that investigated how people who are not strongly engaged with sustainability discourses understand and engage with many of the underlying concerns that animate these discourses from the context of their situated, everyday experiences. This is important information for sustainability educators, because it challenges dominant ideas of what sustainability is and offers new and alternate ways of engaging different groups of people in actions for sustainability. Bourdieu’s concepts of habitus, field and capital were used to inform the research design that employed focus groups and interviews with people from a range of socio-economic and cultural backgrounds and life stages in Tasmania, Australia. The findings provide insight into the ways in which people who are disengaged from discourses of sustainability may be actively engaged in practices of sustainability that may provide practical guidance for environmentalists and policy makers concerning how current discourses of sustainability reflect specific social contexts and experiences.

Keywords

Bourdieuhermeneuticssustainabilitydiscoursequalitative
Type
Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 36 , Special Issue 3: Making connections: Creating relationships with nonhuman nature, place and community , November 2020 , pp. 246 - 263
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., & Turner, B.S. (2000). The Penguin dictionary of sociology (4th ed.). London, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Allardt, E. (1993). Having, loving, being: An alternative to the Swedish model of welfare research. In Nussbaum, M. & Sen, A. (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 88–94). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, M. (1996). Culture and agency: The place of culture in social theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Government. (2015). The Great Depression. Retrieved from http://www.australia.gov.au/about-australia/australian-story/great-depression Google Scholar
Australian Government. (n.d.). Environmentally friendly products. Retrieved from http://www.australia.gov.au/information-and-services/environment/environment-friendly-products Google Scholar
Baek, S.J. (2018). Reconstructing modernisation inclusive and sustainable. In Baek, S.J. (Ed.), The Political Economy of Neo-modernisation: Rethinking the dynamics of technology, development and inequality (pp. 27–63). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beasy, K. (2018). Encounters with sustainability in Tasmania: An interpretive inquiry. Unpublished PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Berlach, R.G., & Chambers, D.J. (2011). Interpreting inclusivity: An endeavour of great proportions. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15, 529–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beresford, Q. (2015). The rise and fall of Gunns Ltd. Sydney, Australia: New South Publishing.Google Scholar
Bernardo, A.I. (2003). Do Filipino youth really value education? Exploring Filipino adolescents’ beliefs about the abstract and pragmatic value of education and its relationship to achievement goals and learning strategies Philippine Journal of Psychology, 36, 49–67.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Vive la Crise! for heterodoxy in social science. Theory and Society, 19, 773–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990a). In other words. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990b). The logic of practice. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1996). On the family as a realized category. Theory, Culture & Society, 13, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, J. (2013). Re-storing the earth: A phenomenological study of living sustainably. Phenomenology & Practice, 7, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacioppo, J.T., & Patrick, W. (2008). Loneliness: Human nature and the need for social connection. New York City, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Carson, R. (2002). Silent spring (Anniversary ed.). Boston, MA: Mariner Books.Google Scholar
Castro, C.J. (2004). Sustainable development: Mainstream and critical perspectives. Organization and Environment, 17, 195–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, J. (2012, October). The discourse on sustainable development: How political and scientific codes go along with each other. Paper presented at Berlin Conference on Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Collins, P.H. (1998). It’s all in the family: Intersections of gender, race, and nation. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 13, 62–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, A. (2017, July 16). What’s happening to the Great Australian Dream? ABC News. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-16/housing-affordability-whats-happening-to-great-australian-dream/8694330 Google Scholar
Cresswell, T. (2014). Place: An introduction (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Crouch, M., & McKenzie, H. (2006). The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research. Social Science Information, 45, 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, K.J. (2001). Deconstructing family time: From ideology to lived experience. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davison, A. (2009). The language of longing: Rationality, morality, and experience in education for sustainability. In Willis, P., McKenzie, S., & Harris, R. (Eds.), Rethinking work and learning: Adult and vocational education for social sustainability (pp. 63–79). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denniss, R. (2017, June). Grandfathering the Australian Dream. The Monthly. Retrieved from https://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2017/june/1496239200/richard-denniss/grandfathering-australian-dream Google Scholar
Dreyer, H., Botha, E., Van der Merwe, D., Le Roux, N., & Ellis, S. (2016). Consumers’ understanding and use of textile eco-labels during pre-purchase decision making. Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences, 1, 1–19.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J.S. (1997). Democracy in capitalist times: Ideals, limits, and struggles. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J.S. (2013). The politics of the Earth: Environmental discourses (3rd ed). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. (2013). Living in a minority food culture: A phenomenological investigation of being vegetarian/vegan. Phenomenology & Practice, 7, 11–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder‐Vass, D. (2007). Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu in an emergentist theory of action. Sociological Theory, 25, 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, F., & Black, M. (Eds.). (1995). Greening environmental policy: The politics of a sustainable future. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B.S., & Stutzer, A. (2010). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect human well-being. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gottschlich, D., & Bellina, L. (2017). Environmental justice and care: Critical emancipatory contributions to sustainability discourse. Agriculture and Human Values, 34, 941–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, A. (2014). Voices from the margins: Anti-oppressive environmental education. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Gough, A. (2018). Sustainable development and global citizenship education: Challenging imperatives. In Davies, I. et al. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of global citizenship and education (pp. 295–312). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haebich, A. (2008). Spinning the dream: Assimilation in Australia 1950–1970. Fremantle, Australia: Fremantle Press.Google Scholar
Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7, 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haller, M., & Hadler, M. (2006). How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: An international comparative analysis. Social Indicators Research, 75, 169–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, C., & Denniss, R. (2005). Affluenza: When too much is never enough. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Hidalgo, M.C., & Hernández, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurka, T. (1993). Perfectionism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jepson, P. (2018). Recoverable Earth: A twenty-first century environmental narrative. Ambio, 48, 123–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, B. (2016). How ‘The Australian Dream’ is Growing Old … Fast [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.uts.edu.au/research-and-teaching/ourresearch/public-policy-and-governance/news/how-australian-dream-growing Google Scholar
Kelly, G., & Coggan, A. (2007). Quality of life and sustainability on the Central Coast (Report to Gosford City and Wyong Shire Councils). Canberra, Australia: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems. Retrieved from https://www.wyong.nsw.gov.au/getmedia/eec83204-a3d1-4ada-8219-d06f7fa9fc9e/Quality-of-Life-Report.aspx Google Scholar
Kline, K.N. (2006). A decade of research on health content in the media: The focus on health challenges and sociocultural context and attendant informational and ideological problems. Journal of Health Communication, 11, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knibb, J.N., & Taylor, A.K. (2017). Living ‘light green’: The limits and lived experiences of green motherhood. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 20, 370–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krüger, O. (2019). The paradox of sustainable degrowth and a convivial alternative. Environmental Values 28, 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, A. (1949). A sand county almanac and sketches here and there. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macnaghten, P., & Urry, J. (1998). Contested natures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Maslow, A.H. (1958). A dynamic theory of human motivation. In Chalmers, S. & Manfred, D. (Eds.), Understanding human motivation (pp. 26–47). Ithaca, NY: H. Allen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, D.C. (1987). Human motivation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge of University Press.Google Scholar
Middlemiss, L. (2014). Individualised or participatory? Exploring late modern identity and sustainable development. Environmental Politics, 23, 929–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moules, N.J. (2002). Hermeneutic inquiry: Paying heed to history and Hermes: An ancestral, substantive, and methodological tale. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, D., & Gericke, N. (2017). The effect of gender on students’ sustainability consciousness: A nationwide Swedish study. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48, 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ott, K. (2003.) The case for strong sustainability. In Ott, K. & Thapa, P.P. (Eds.), Greifswald’s environmental ethics: From the work of the Michael Otto Professorship at Ernst Moritz Arndt University 1997–2002. Greigswald, Germany: Steinbecker Verlag Ulrich Rose.Google Scholar
Pfeifer, E. (2011). De-politicizing the environment: An inquiry into the nature of the sustainable development discourse. Global Politics. http://www.globalpolitics.cz/clanky/de-politicizing-the-environment-an-inquiry-into-the-nature-of-the-sustainable-development-discourse Google Scholar
Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason (Environmental Philosophies). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (2001). Social capital: Measurement and consequences. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2, 41–51.Google Scholar
Redclift, M., & Springett, D. (Eds.). (2015). Routledge international handbook of sustainable development. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root-Bernstein, M., Gooden, J., & Boyes, A. (2018). Rewilding in practice: Projects and policy. Geoforum, 97, 292–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seymour, J., & Walsh, J. (2013). Displaying families, migrant families and community connectedness: The application of an emerging concept in family life. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 44, 689–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SokWe. (2013, September 13). Sociology is a martial art 2002 Bourdieu 1/10 [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9PCp9oKPRw Google Scholar
Spaargaren, G., & Mol, A.P.J. (2008). Green global consumption: Redefining politics and authority. Global Environmental Change, 18, 3560–3359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, A. (2010, July 28). RSA ANIMATE: First as tragedy, then as farce [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpAMbpQ8J7g Google Scholar
Stratford, E., Armstrong, D., & Jaskolski, M. (2003). Relational spaces and the geopolitics of community participation in two Tasmanian local governments: A case for agonistic pluralism? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28, 461–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiberius, V. (2005). Value commitments and the balanced Life. Utilitas, 17, 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization. (2016). The determinants of health. Geneva, Switzerland: Author. http://www.who.int/hia/evidence/doh/en/ Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (2009). First as tragedy, then as farce. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.Google Scholar