Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T22:27:02.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental Progressivism: A Framework for a Sustainable Higher Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Matthew Thomas
Matthew Thomas*
Affiliation:
The University of Adelaide
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The underlying ideologies which support higher education have received only limited attention in relation to our desired goals of social and ecological sustainability. This paper examines the current ideologies which drive higher education, and proposes a different ideological framework which can be used to support a sustainable higher education. Firstly, a criticism of the current convergence of utilitarian and neo-liberal ideologies is presented from the perspective of sustainability. Secondly, building upon the educational theory of John Dewey, an alternative perspective termed “environmental progressivism” is outlined as a possible ideological framework for a sustainable higher education. The paper concludes with some preliminary remarks as to the practical implications of environmental progressivism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 15: Volume 15-16 , 1999 , pp. 103 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alomes, S. 1983, ‘The University and Society in the Twentieth Century - Autonomy and Dependence’, Curriculum Priorities in Australian Higher Education. Fielding, A. J. and Cavanagh, D. M. (Eds.), Croon Helm Australia, Canberra, Australia, pp. 27–37.Google Scholar
Aper, J. 1993, ‘Integrating the Ends and Means of Education: Environmental Studies as a Framework for Liberal Learning’, International Journal of Environmental Education and Information, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 307–314.Google Scholar
Apple, M. W. 1996, Cultural Politics and Education, Open University Press, Buckingham, UK.Google Scholar
Baldwin, G. 1990, ‘Teaching in Australian Tertiary Institutions: Possible Effects of Federal Government Policies’, The Changing Face of Professional Education. Bezzina, M. and Butcher, J. (Eds.), Australian Association for Research in Education, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Biosvert, R. D. 1998, John Dewey: Rethinking Our Time, State University of New York Press, Albany, USA.Google Scholar
Bloom, A. 1987, The Closing of the American Mind: How Higher Education Has Failed Democracy and Impoverished the Souls of Today's Students, Simon and Schuster, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Bowers, C. A. 1988, The Cultural Dimensions of Educational Computing Understanding the Non-Neutrality of Technology, Teachers College Press, Columbia University, USA.Google Scholar
Bowers, C. A. 1993, Education, Cultural Myths and the Ecological Crisis: Towards Deep Changes, State University of New York Press, Albany, USA.Google Scholar
Brooks, W. 1994, ‘Was Dewey a Marxist?’, Discourse, vol. 13 http://www.stlawrenceinstitute.org/voll3brk.html.Google Scholar
Bullock, A. & Stallybrass, O. (Eds.) (1977). The Fontana Dictionary of Modern Thought. Fontana Books, London.Google Scholar
Candy, P. C., Crebert, G. and O'Leary, J. 1994, Developing Lifelong Learners through Undergraduate Education, National Board of Employment, Education and Training, AGPS, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Coombs, P. H. 1982, ‘Critical World Educational Issues of the Next Two Decades’, Internationa! Review of Education, vol. 28, pp. 143–157.Google Scholar
Dennis, L. J. & Knapp, D. 1997, ‘John Dewey as Environmental Educator’, Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 5–9.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1959, ‘My Pedagogic Creed’, Dewey on Education. Dworkin, M. S. (Ed.), Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1960, Theory of the Moral Life, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York, USA.Google Scholar
D'Urso, S. 1990, ‘Editor's Note’, Discourse, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 92.Google Scholar
Fankena, W. K. 1965, Three Historical Philosophies of Education: Aristotle, Kant and Dewey, Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, USA.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1998, The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
IUCN, UNEP and WWF 1991, Caring for the Earth: A Strategy for Sustainable Living, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Jones, K. 1989, Right Turn: The Conservative Revolution in Education, Hutchinson Radius, London, UK.Google Scholar
Knapper, C. K. and Cropley, A. J. 1991, Lifelong Learning and Higher Education, Kogan Page, London, UK.Google Scholar
Nash, R. 1976, Logs, Universities and the Environmental Education Compromise, ERIC Information Analysis Centre for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education, Columbus, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Board of Employment Education and Training 1996, Lifelong Learning: Key Issues, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
National Review Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education 1997, Higher Education in the Learning Society, National Review Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education, UK.Google Scholar
Orr, D. W. 1990, “The Liberal Arts, the Campus and the Biosphere’, Harvard Educational Review, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 205–216.Google Scholar
Orr, D. W. 1992, ‘The Problem of Education’, The Campus and Environmental Responsibility. Eagan, D. J. and Orr, D. W. (Eds.), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, USA, pp. 3–8.Google Scholar
Postman, N. & Weingartner, C. 1971, Teaching as a Subversive Activity, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, UK.Google Scholar
Quicke, J. 1996, ‘Work, Education, and Democratic Identity’, International Studies in Sociology of Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, M. 1975, The Universities in the Nineteenth Century, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, UK.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A. M. 1987, ‘A Liberal Arts Model for Environmental Education: The First Fifteen Years of the Environmental Studies Program at St. Lawrence University’, Environmental Professional, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 244–246.Google Scholar
Sherrington, G. 1983, ‘An Uneasy Alliance - Liberal and Vocational Ends in the Australian University System - The Impact of Teacher Training’, Curriculum Priorities in Australian Higher Education. Fielding, A. J. and Cavanagh, D. M. (Eds.), Croon Helm Australia, Canberra, Australia, pp. 27–37.Google Scholar
The Review Committee on Higher Education Financing and Policy 1998, Learning for Life, DEETYA, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
UNESCO 1997, Educating for a Sustainable Future: A Transdisciplinary Vision for Concerted Action, UNESCO, Paris, France.Google Scholar
UNESCO 1999, Preparing for a Sustainable Future: Higher Education and Sustainable Human Development, UNESCO, Paris, France.Google Scholar
United Nations 1993, Agenda 21: The United Nations Program of Action from Rio, United Nations Publications, New York, USA.Google Scholar