Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:58:31.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Retaining Indigenous Students in Tertiary Education: Lessons from the Griffith School of Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2015

Catherine Howlett ,
Monica Seini ,
Chris Matthews ,
Bronwyn Dillon  and
Vivian Hauser
Catherine Howlett
Affiliation:
Griffith School of Environment, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, 4111, Australia
Monica Seini
Affiliation:
Clean Environment Branch Strategy and Policy, Environment Protection Agency, PO Box 15155, City East, Queensland, 4002, Australia
Chris Matthews
Affiliation:
Griffith School of Environment, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, 4111, Australia
Bronwyn Dillon
Affiliation:
Gumurrii Student Support Unit, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, 4111, Australia
Vivian Hauser
Affiliation:
Griffith School of Environment, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, 4111, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Low retention of Indigenous peoples in all Australian universities has been identified as a problematic issue by the Australian Federal government. Griffith University (GU), Queensland, Australia, provided funding to examine the factors affecting Indigenous retention in higher education, with the aim of developing innovative participation and retention strategies specifically for Indigenous students. This paper focuses on research conducted within the Griffith School of Environment that questioned the possible links between the provision of information to commencing Indigenous students and their retention. It essentially examines to what extent current university structures support Indigenous enrolments and retention, via the information they receive upon enrolling. From interviews conducted in an informal discussion format with currently enrolled Indigenous students in the Griffith School of Environment, critical deficiencies were identified in the information Indigenous students receive during the early transition phase of university entrance. A key finding of this study, and which is the subject of current research, was the support amongst the students for the development of an Indigenised curriculum in science as a strategy for improving the attraction and retention of Indigenous students. This paper details the research project and its findings.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , 2008 , pp. 18 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balick, M. J., & Cox, P. A. (1997). Plants, people and culture: The science of ethnobotany. New York, NY: Scientific American Library.Google Scholar
Cape Breton University Canada. (2008). Integrative Science Brochure. Retrieved 30 July, 2006, from http://marcatodigital.com/iish/pdf/integrative_science_brochure.pdf.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia. (2008). The National Report to Parliament on Indigenous Education and Training 2005. Retrieved 20 May, 2008, http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/indigenous_education/publications_resources/other_publications/National_Report_Parliament_Indigenous_2005.htm.Google Scholar
Falk, P. (2004). Moving towards an holistic and multi-disciplined approach to Indigenous Australian studies at Griffith University. Discussion paper for Griffith University, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Griffith University. (2008). Griffith Academic Plan 3. Learning for Success. Retrieved 27 May, 2008, from http://www.griffith.edu.au/ua/aa/plans/.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (1998). Is science multicultural? Postcolonialisms, feminisms and epistemologies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, V., & Moore, K. (2005, October). To see through the eyes of another: The third space - an alternative view of Australian studies. Paper presented to the Social Change in the 21st Century Conference, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
Hauser, V. (2008). The place of Indigenous knowledge in tertiary science education: A case study of Canadian practices in Indigenising the curriculum. Unpublished Honours dissertation, Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Howitt, R., & Suchet-Pearson, S. (2003). Ontological pluralism in contested cultural landscapes. In Anderson, K., Domosh, M., Pile, S. & Thrift, N. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural geography (pp. 557–568). London: Sage Oak Publications.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lowe, K., & Cociumbas, J. (2000, November). Joint partnerships in Indigenising tertiary curricula. Paper presented at Australian Indigenous Education Conference, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.Google Scholar
Malatest, R. A., & Associates. (2004). Aboriginal peoples and post-secondary education: What educators have learnt. Montreal, QC: Canadian Millennium Scholarship Foundation.Google Scholar
McLisky, C., & Day, D. (2004). Black and white science: Encouraging Indigenous Australian students into university science and technology. Sydney, NSW: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Mellor, S., & Corrigan, M. (2004). The case for change: A review of contemporary research on Indigenous education outcomes. Camberwell, VIC: ACER Press.Google Scholar
Nakata, M. (2004). Indigenous Australian studies and higher education: 2004 Biennial AIATSIS Wentworth Lecture. Retrieved 11 July, 2007, from http://www1.aiatsis.gov.au/exhibitions/wentworth/a352185_a.pdf.Google Scholar
Nakata, M. (2007). The cultural interface. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 365, 7–14.Google Scholar
O'Keefe, B. (2006, 19 July). Dip in university enrolments, The Australian, p. 30.Google Scholar
Semali, L. M., & Kincheloe, J. L. (1999). Introduction: What is Indigenous knowledge and why should we study it? In Semali, L. M. & Kincheloe, J. (Eds.), What is Indigenous knowledge?: Voicesfrom theacademy (pp. 3–58). New York, NY: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Smith, L. (1999). Decolononizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago Press.Google Scholar
Trent University. (2008). Indigenous studies. Retrieved 28 May, 2008, from http://www.trentu.ca/academic/nativestudies/welcomeB.htm.Google Scholar
Worsley, P. (1997). Knowledge: What different peoples make of the world. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar