Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:05:59.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

a Study on the Intelligence Profiles of Taiwan Indigenous Students: The Case of Second Grade Pupils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2015

Wei-Yu Liu  and
Sue Teele
Wei-Yu Liu
Affiliation:
Center for Teacher Education, National Dong Hwa University, Da Hsueh Road, Shoufeng, Hualien, 97401, Taiwan
Sue Teele
Affiliation:
University of California Education Extension, Riverside, 92507, California, United States of America
Get access

Abstract

This paper attempts to develop an intelligence-fair assessment tool to explore the intelligence profiles of 15 second grade Amis pupils. This study was conducted in an elementary school in Taiwan with a largely Amis population of lower socioeconomic status. The results illustrate that the most developed intelligence for eight pupils was musical intelligence and that most pupils in this class are also skilled at bodily-kinesthetic and linguistic intelligence. However, these second grade pupils did not have very highly developed interpersonal intelligences which traditionally stereotyped the capabilities of indigenous pupils. Furthermore, each student had his/her own unique intelligence profile. Do Amis pupils have a particular intelligence profile as a group? Or are their individual differences greater than their group similarities? It is recommended that future studies observe both the whole ethnic group and individual pupil's intelligence profile to help each pupil develop to their full potential.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 83 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, T. (1993). 7 kinds of smart. New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Armstrong, T. (2000). Multiple intelligences in the classroom (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Brooks-Gunn, J., Klebanov, P. K., & Duncan, G. J. (1996). Ethnic differences in children's Intelligence Test Scores: Role of Economic Deprivation, Home Environment, and Maternal Characteristics. Child Development, 67(2), 396–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, J. Q., & Gardner, H. (1997). Alternative assessment from a multiple intelligences perspective. In Torff, B. (Ed.), Multiple intelligences and assessment (pp. 27–54). Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight.Google Scholar
Council of Indigenous Affairs. (2008). The tribe in Taiwan. Retrieved 5 May, 2009, from http://www.apc.gov.tw/main/docDetail/detail_ethnic.jsp?cateID=A000427&linkSelf=147&linkRoot=101.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hatch, T., & Gardner, H. (1997). If Binet had looked beyond the classroom: The assessment of multiple intelligences. In Torff, B. (Ed.), Multiple intelligences and assessment (pp. 5–26). Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight.Google Scholar
Helms, J. E. (1997). The triple quandary of race, culture, and social class in standardized cognitive ability testing. In Flanagan, D. P., Genshaft, J. L., & Harrison, R L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests and issues (pp. 517–532). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kuo, C. C., Chang, L. W., Lin, C. M., & Wang, M. N., Lu, K. M. (1998). A study of the learning characteristics of the culturally different students. Bulletin of Special Education, 17, 325–344.Google Scholar
Lazear, D. (1997). Multiple intelligence approaches to assessment—solving the assessment conundrum. Tucson, AZ: Zephyr Press.Google Scholar
LeCompte, N. D. (1987, February). The cultural context of dropping out: Why good dropout programs don't work. Paper presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Sciences, Chicago, United States of America.Google Scholar
Makuwira, J. (2008). Towards pedagogies of mathematics achievement: An analysis of learning advisers' approaches to the tutoring of mathematics in an indigenous tertiary entry program. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 38, 48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathur, N. (2008). Chanted narratives of indigenous people context and content. Asian Ethnology, 67(1), 103–121.Google Scholar
Nichols, P. L., & Anderson, V. E. (1973). Intellectual performance, race, and socioeconomic status. Social Biology, 20, 367–374.Google Scholar
Valencia, R. R. (1979). Comparison of intellectual performance of Chicano and Anglo third-grade boys on the Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices. Psychology in the Schools, 16, 448–453.Google Scholar
Valencia, R. R., Rankin, R. J., & Livingston, R. (1995). K-ABC and content bias: Comparisons between Mexican American and white children. Psychology in the Schools, 32, 153–169.Google Scholar
Walters, J., & Gardner, H. (1997). Domain projects as assessment vehicles in a computer-rich environment. In Torff, B. (Ed.), Multiple intelligences and assessment (pp. 85–107). Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. (1991). Trauma of Sioux Indian high school students. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 22, 367–383.Google Scholar
Young, S. D. (1998). A follow-up study of the relationship of ethnicity and academic achievement: The case of Taitung County. Unpublished Masters thesis, National Taitung University, Taitung, Taiwan.Google Scholar