Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:20:44.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Takina te Kawa: Laying the Foundation, a Research Engagement Methodology in Aotearoa (New Zealand)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2015

Marama Taiwhati ,
Rawiri Toia ,
Pania Te Maro ,
Hiria McRae  and
Tabitha McKenzie
Marama Taiwhati
Affiliation:
Te Kura Māori – The School of Māori, Pacific, and Indigenous Education, Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 17310, Karori, Wellington, New Zealand
Rawiri Toia
Affiliation:
Te Kura Māori – The School of Māori, Pacific, and Indigenous Education, Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 17310, Karori, Wellington, New Zealand
Pania Te Maro
Affiliation:
Te Kura Māori – The School of Māori, Pacific, and Indigenous Education, Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 17310, Karori, Wellington, New Zealand
Hiria McRae
Affiliation:
Te Kura Māori – The School of Māori, Pacific, and Indigenous Education, Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 17310, Karori, Wellington, New Zealand
Tabitha McKenzie
Affiliation:
Te Kura Māori – The School of Māori, Pacific, and Indigenous Education, Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 17310, Karori, Wellington, New Zealand
Get access

Abstract

In the bi-cultural context of Aotearoa (New Zealand), engagement with stakeholders that is transparent and culturally responsive is a priority for educational research. More common research approaches in New Zealand have followed a Western euro-centric model of engagement with research participants resulting in interventions and initiatives that have not necessarily served the needs of the education sector. The authors critically analyse the researcher relationship with research participants to provide a Māori perspective to guide the engagement process as researchers enter educational communities to conduct research. Embedded with Māori ideology and knowledge, the Hei Korowai ethical research framework is a platform for insider positionality that acknowledges partnership between the researcher and the researched for the benefit of knowledge development and the educational sector.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , 2010 , pp. 110 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, R. (1996). Collaborative research stories: Whakawhanaungatanga. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.Google Scholar
Chavez, C. (2008). Conceptualizing from the inside: Advantages, complications, and demands on insider positionality. The Qualitative Report, 13, 474–494.Google Scholar
Chrisp, S. (2005). Māori intergenerational language transmission. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 172, 149–181.Google Scholar
Gergen, K. J. (2000). An invitation to social construction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Hindle, R., McRae, H., Te Maro, P., & Toia, R. (2008). The “Hei Korowai” ethical framework. Unpublished paper, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, A., Glynn, T., Grace, W., Penetito, W., & Bateman, S. (2008). Indigenous epistemology in a national curriculum framework? Ethnicities, 8(1), 102–127.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. H., Park, H. S., Grenot-Scheyer, M., Schwartz, I., & Harry, B. (1998). Participatory research: New approaches to the research to practice dilemma. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23, 165–177.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education. (2005). An evaluation of Te Poutama Tau 2004. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.Google Scholar
Penetito, W. (2001, October). If we only knew … Contextualising Maori knowledge. Paper presented to NZCER Conference, Early Childhood Education for a Democratic Society, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Smith, G. H. (2003, October). Indigenous struggle for the transformation of education and schooling. Keynote Address to the Alaskan Federation of Natives (AFN) Convention, Anchorage, Alaska, United States of America.Google Scholar
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous people. Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, L. T. (2005). On tricky ground: Researching the native in the age of uncertainty. In Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 85–107). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Walker, R., Eketone, A., & Gibbs, A. (2006). An exploration of kaupapa Māori research, its principles, processes and applications. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5(4), 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfgramm, R. (2008). Creativity and institutional innovation in intercultural research. MAI Review, 3, article 6.Google Scholar